Dci Beech Lake
A dialysis facility in Lexington, Tennessee 38351
870 W Church Street, Lexington, Tennessee 38351. (731) 968-2513.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years
- 7 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jan 23, 2025: a standard inspection.
1 deficiency cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 23, 2025: standard inspection1 deficiency
-
Achieve Adequate Clearance
The inspectors’ words, 1,354 words
“POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19001 Based on policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 (Patient #1, 2 and 4) sampled in-center hemodialysis patients received the prescribed dialysis prescription for BFR and/or Heparin. The facility also failed to notify the physician the patient’s dialysis prescription could not be delivered as ordered. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy “INITITATION OF THE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT FOR AVF/AVG AND CVC” last revised 11/10/16 revealed, “PURPOSE: To identify the steps required to initiate hemodialysis treatment in a safe and efficient manner per the dialysis prescription... Adjusts blood flow rate according to access/physician orders...if unable to obtain ordered BFR, trouble shoot causes and involve CN if needed. Document BFR obtained and efforts resolution...” 2. Review of the facility policy “Darwin Direct (Documentation Incenter Real-Time Electronic Chairside Treatment)” issued December 2018, revealed... “The Heparin Dose should be recorded at least every hour...” 3. Medical record review for Patient #1 revealed an admission date of 8/29/2024 with diagnoses which included ESRD. A physician’s order dated 11/6/2024 revealed dialysis 3 times per week with a prescribed BFR of 400. Review of the 12/18/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the following: 12:02 PM until 12:32 PM, the BFR was 350;and then 300 from 12:32 PM until 3:02 PM (the end of treatment), the BFR was 300. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 400. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription was not delivered as ordered.. Review of the 12/20/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the following: 12:32 PM until 2:38 PM (the end of treatment), the BFR was 375. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 400. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription was not delivered as ordered.. Review of the 12/23/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the the following: 12:02 PM until 2:41 PM (the end of treatment), the BFR was 350. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 400. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription not delivered as ordered.. Review of the 1/1/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the following: 12:01 PM until 2:50 PM (the end of treatment), the BFR was 350. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 400. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription was not delivered as ordered.. Review of the 1/3/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the following: 11:32 AM until 2:37 PM (the end of treatment) the BFR was 200. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 400. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription was not delivered as ordered. Review of the 1/6/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the following: 12:01 PM until 2:51 PM (the end of treatment), the BFR was 350. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 400. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription was not delivered as ordered. 4. Medical record review for Patient #2 revealed an admission date of 12/29/2023 with diagnoses which included Chronic Kidney Disease. A physician’s order dated 12/29/2023 (renewed 12/2/2024) revealed a 5000-unit load of IV Heparin and hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units for 3 hours during dialysis. Review of the 11/11/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. Review of the 11/20/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. Review of the 11/29/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. Review of the 12/30/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. Review of the 1/1/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. Review of the 1/3/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. Review of the 1/13/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. The flowsheet revelaed Heparin 0.6 Units was given, with no documentation the 0.6 units of Heparin administered was not included in the total on flowsheet. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. Review of the 1/15/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. Review of the 1/17/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the hourly dose of IV Heparin 500 units was not charted as given. There was no documentation why the 500 units of Heparin was not infused. There was no documentation the physician was notified Heparin was not infused as ordered. 5. Medical record review for Patient #4 revealed an admission date of 7/23/2021 with diagnoses which included ESRD and HTN. A physician’s order dated 12/2/2024 revealed dialysis 3 times per week with a BFR of 425. Review of the 12/18/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the following: 7:03 AM until 9:28 AM (the end of treatment), the BFR was 350. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 425. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription was not delivered as ordered. Review of the 12/20/2024 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the following: 6:32 AM until 7:02 AM,the BFR was 300; 7:32 AM until 9:55 AM (the end of treatment), the BFR was 400. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 425. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription was not delivered as ordered. Review of the 1/3/2025 Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the following: 9:03 AM until 9:58 AM (the end of treatment), the BFR was 300. There was no documentation why the BFR was not delivered at the ordered rate of 425. There was no documentation the physician was notified the dialysis prescription was not delivered as ordered. 6. During an interview on 1/22/2025 at 12:49 PM, the NM verified the staff should document on the hemodialysis flowsheet the reason they are unable to achieve the prescribed BFR during dialysis. During an interview on 1/22/2024 at 1:30 PM the NM stated, “Heparin usage should be noted hourly”. The NM further stated the hourly infusion was programmed into the machine and delivered correctly, but staff were failing to manually enter the infusion amounts on the dialysis flowsheets.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2025 | Standard inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 3, 2005.
- Run as a non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 7 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Dialysis Clinic, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Henderson County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 3 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Davita Lexington Dialysis (TN) | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.