Hearth Record

Fmc Dialysis Assoc. of Smyrna

A dialysis facility in Smyrna, Tennessee 37167

10519 Cedar Grove Rd, Smyrna, Tennessee 37167. (615) 220-1739.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 17, 2025: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 17, 2025: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Ic - Sanitary Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 468 words

    “IC-SANITARY ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.30 The dialysis facility must provide and monitor a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents within and between the unit and any adjacent hospital or other public areas. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46831 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide and monitor a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents between the unit and the waiting area for 28 residents. The finding included: 1. Observations in the waiting area on 4/14/2024 at 11:35 AM, revealed the treatment room door was wide open, and no receptionist was at the front desk. The surveyor stood at the front desk for approximately 5 minutes when a patient came out through the open door. The patient went back through the open door and notified staff there was a visitor outside. RN #1 came to the door and the surveyor notified her of the complaint survey. RN #1 turned back around and headed back to the treatment area without closing the door. She yelled out to another staff member, “Close the door right now. The State is in the building.” CCHT #1 came outside the door, dressed in full PPE, reached above the door fame to hit the switch for the door to close, then entered back into the treatment area. At approximately 11:40 AM, RN #2 escorted a patient out the treatment room door wearing a gown and gloves and returned to the treatment area. There were 28 patients receiving hemodialysis treatment on the treatment floor. 2. During an interview on 4/15/2025 at 11:00 AM, RN #1 stated, “...I met you at the door ...the door should have not been open...I should have closed the door...[named] CCHT #1and RN #2 should not have come out of the treatment area without taking their PPE off...” During a telephone interview on 4/15/2025 at 4:22 PM, RN #2 stated the treatment room door was open when the surveyor arrived at the clinic. When asked about exiting the treatment area and entering into the waiting area with PPE on, RN #2 stated, “...I had on my gown and gloves...that was an infection control issue...they should have been removed before bringing the patient out of the treatment area...” During a telephone interview on 4/16/2025 at 4:30 PM, the CM stated the treatment area door should never be left open. The open door could cause infection control issues related to cross contamination. During an interview on 4/17/2025 at 9:49 AM, CCHT #1 stated, “...I opened the door for a patient in a wheelchair...there was another patient coming on a stretcher...the door should not have been left open ...it is a security, privacy, and infection control issue...” CCHT #1 then stated he should have not come out of the treatment area with PPE on.”

    Rule V0111. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46831 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide patients and staff a safe treatment environment when the treatment area door was left propped open allowing the potential entry of unauthorized individuals for 28 patients. The findings included: 1. Observations in the waiting area on 4/14/2025 at 11:35 AM, revealed a wide-open treatment area door with staff unaware of the surveyor’s presence. The surveyor went unnoticed for approximately 5 minutes until a patient exited the treatment area through the open door. There were 28 patients receiving hemodialysis treatment on the treatment floor. 2. During an interview on 4/15/2025 at 11:00 AM, RN #1 stated the door between the waiting area and the treatment area should have not been open. During a telephone interview on 4/16/2025 at 4:30 PM, the CM stated the treatment area door should never be left open. The CM stated that the open door left patients vulnerable and at a safety risk. During an interview on 4/17/2025 at 9:49 AM, CCHT #1 stated he opened the door earlier but should have closed it after bringing a patient into the treatment area. He stated his actions caused a security concern for the patients.”

    Rule V0401. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Privacy & Confidentiality In Treatment

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “PR-PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY-TREATMENT CFR(s): 494.70(a)(3) The patient has the right to- (3) Privacy and confidentiality in all aspects of treatment; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46831 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy and confidentiality for 28 patients receiving hemodialyisis treatment. The findings included: 1. Observations in the waiting area on 4/14/2025 at 11:35 AM, revealed a wide-open treatment area door where patients were observed receiving hemodialysis and staff was working. The surveyor observed for approximately 5 minutes until a patient exited the treatment area through the open door and notified RN #1. There were 28 patients receiving hemodialysis treatment on the treatment floor. 2. During an interview on 4/15/2025 at 11:00 AM, RN #1 stated the door between the waiting area and the treatment area should have been closed. During a telephone interview on 4/16/2025 at 4:30 PM, the CM stated the treatment area door should always be closed. An open door would violate the patients’ right to privacy. During an interview on 4/17/2025 at 9:49 AM, CCHT #1 stated he had left the treatment area door open and left patient exposed to anyone who came into the clinic.”

    Rule V0454. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 17, 2025Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Apr 11, 2003.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • 16 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (30 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 53% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Rutherford County, 5 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 3 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.