Hearth Record

Dci Dayton

A dialysis facility in Dayton, Tennessee 37321

230 White Oak Road, Dayton, Tennessee 37321. (423) 775-3386.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 17, 2025: a standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 17, 2025: standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 484 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27405 Based on facility policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed facility procedure for the administration of an oral medication. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, “MEDICATION POLICY,” dated 5/22/2013, revealed “...Preparation and Administration of Medication...Nurses are responsible for administering medications throughout the time they are scheduled to go off duty to ensure all medications are properly administered...” Review of the facility policy, “Administration of Rocaltrol [viamin D preperation],” dated 1/17/2019, revealed “...POLICY...All licensed personnel administering...will have a skills checklist reflecting mastery of medication administration...PROCEDURE...Verify physician’s order...Perform hand hygiene, don PPE (personal protective equipment) ...Administer...per 5 rights of medication administration...Remove gloves (PPE), perform hand hygiene...” Review of Registered Nurse (RN A’s) Medication Administration Skills Checklist, signed 6/20/2025, revealed “...Medication Administration...Medication (Basic) Knowledge...Medication is prepared in clean dedicated area; Discards med if placed on a contaminated surface,,,Hand hygiene prior to medication preparation...Meds (PO) [by mouth] are not handled with bare hands...discards gloves and hand hygiene...” Observations of the clinical area on 9/15/2025, from 1:45 PM to 2:05 PM, revealed RN A was present at the medication counter at the nurses’ station preparing medications. At 1:50 PM, RN A obtained a bottle of medication from the locking medication storage cabinet below the medication counter. RN A opened a bottle of medication and dropped 3 tablets into a medication cup, a 4th tablet exited the bottle, bounced off of the tablets in the medication cup, and rolled across the medication counter. RN A observed the tablet roll across the counter, picked up the tablet with her non gloved right hand and placed the tablet into the medication bottle. RN A placed the medication bottle with the contaminated tablet back into the medication storage cabinet for the next use...” During an interview with observation on 9/15/2025 at 1:55 PM, RN A confirmed she placed a tablet back in its original container after a tablet had rolled across the medication counter during medication preparation. She stated “...I probably shouldn’t have...” when questioned regarding the preparation and storage of medications. RN A then opened the medication storage cabinet, the bottle of medication which contained the contaminated tablet was present and available for use. During an interview on 9/17/2025 at 10:20 AM, the Area Operations Director stated the facility did not have a policy for the medication RN A had prepared and subsequently allowed a tablet to roll across the counter. A policy/procedure was used for reference of another medication which was a medication given PO (by mouth). The Area Operation Assistant stated the procedure is basically the same and confirmed RN A did not follow the facility’s medication preparation procedure.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 580 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27405 Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to address 1 patient’s (Patient #6) fluid volume status within the plan of care of 6 patients reviewed for fluid and blood pressure management. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, “Patient Assessment And Patient Plan of Care,” revised 3/2022, showed “...PURPOSE...To establish an individualized, comprehensive plan of care that addresses the patient’s needs...Assessment criteria...The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include at a minimum...Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, blood pressure, and fluid management needs...The plan of care must...specify services necessary to address the patient’s needs...include measurable and expected outcomes...” Review of the facility policy, “Post-Treatment Assessment,” dated 9/26/2018, showed “...Routine post treatment assessment will include but not limited to...Respiratory status...Cardiac status...Dry weight...Assessment of vital signs...Any vital sign or assessment...abnormality will be reported to Physician...” Patient #6 was admitted to the facility on 2/7/2025 with diagnoses including Anemia and End Stage Renal Disease. Review of Patient #6’s Hemodialysis Treatment Sheets dated 8/25/2025-9/12/2025, showed the prescribed estimated dry weight (EDW) was 153.0 kilograms/kgs (1 kg = 2.2 pounds). Review showed Patient #6’s post-dialysis weights were 1.2 to 3 (6.6 pounds) greater than the physician prescribed EDW for 6 of 9 treatments reviewed. Patient #6’s fluid status at the end of treatments, determined by the post dialysis weight, showed the interdialytic (between treatments) weight gain was not completely removed. Continued review showed Patient #6’s pre-dialysis weight on 9/1/2025 was 161.0 kgs, which was 8 kg (17.6 pounds) over the EDW. The nursing staff noted on multiple dialysis flowsheets of either excessive weight gains or Patient #6 leaving the clinic with greater than desired fluid weight (heavy). Further review revealed no documentation of Patient #6’s fluid status was communicated to the physician or Nurse Practitioner (NP) for each day Patient #6 left the clinic heavy. There were no entries on the treatment sheets of interventions for excess fluid gains being addressed by the patient’s interdisciplinary team (IDT). Review of Patient #6’s care plan dated 3/18/2025, showed no documentation of interventions developed by the IDT team to address Patient #6’s excessive fluid gains between dialysis treatments. No documentation of any avenues explored by the IDT team to address Patient #6’s excessive fluid gains and return to the prescribed EDW was added to the care plan. During an interview on 9/16/2025 at 10:55 AM, the NP stated when excessive fluid gains were recognized, interventions such as UF (ultra filtration-removal of fluid) profiling (a program within the dialysis machine) to aid in obtaining fluid from patients by utilizing UF for 1 hour at the beginning of treatment. No UF or other interventions were documented on Patient #6’s care plan to address excess fluid gains. During an interview on 9/17/2025 at 9:08 AM, the Charge Nurse (CN B) confirmed he was aware Patient #6 had excessive fluid gains between dialysis treatments. CN B confirmed Patient #6’s care plan did not identify and implement actions to aid in improvement of Patient #6’s fluid management. CN B confirmed Patient #6 had ongoing problems with excessive fluid intake during and between dialysis treatments and Patient #6’s care plan did not indicate Patient #6 had a fluid volume problem.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 17, 2025Standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 14, 1990.
  • Run as a non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 14 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Dialysis Clinic, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Rhea County.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.