Davita Market Commons Dialysis Center
A dialysis facility in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29577
1350 Farrow Parkway, Suite 100, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29577. (843) 839-0966.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 5of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 5of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 17 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 30, 2023: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 30, 2023: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Microbial Monitoring - Sample Before Disinfect
The inspectors’ words, 258 words
“MICROB MONITOR-SAMPLE BEFORE DISINFECT CFR(s): 494.40(a) 7.2 Microbial monitoring methods 7.2.1 General: samples before disinfect Samples should always be collected before sanitization/disinfection of the water treatment system and dialysis machines. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30011 Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the dialysis facility failed to ensure that microbiological sample testing was obtained prior to sanitation/disinfection of the facility’s water treatment system. The findings include: Record review on 11/28/23 at 11:00 AM of the facility’s “Monthly Microbial Corrective Action Form” dated 07/13/23 revealed culture samples were collected from the following sites: First H2O (water) out, Bicarb H2O out, Dry Acid H2O out, Last H2O out, and three dialysis machines at 9:00 AM on 07/13/2023. Further review of the facility’s CWP (Continuous Water Pressure) RO (Reverse Osmosis) Unit Chemical Disinfection log revealed a chemical disinfection was initiated on 07/10/23 at 7:28 PM which was 3 days prior to the collection date for the culture samples. Review of BMT 1’s Annual Skills Checklist dated 12/20/22 revealed BMT 1 was checked off by a trainer to: “Perform culture and endotoxin sample collection per policies and procedures”. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 1:18 PM, Biomedical Technician (BMT) 1 stated, “I honestly don’t know when the cultures were collected in relation to the disinfections. We disinfect on Mondays”. Facility policy, entitled, “Water Culture Policy”, revealed “4. Routine water cultures are collected monthly and within 72 (seventy-two) hours prior to scheduled disinfection of distribution systems. Monthly is defined as within a calendar month...”.”
-
Poc Completed/Signed By Idt & Patient
The inspectors’ words, 381 words
“POC-COMPLETED/SIGNED BY IDT & PT CFR(s): 494.90(b)(1) The patient’s plan of care must- (i) Be completed by the interdisciplinary team, including the patient if the patient desires; and (ii) Be signed by the team members, including the patient or the patient’s designee; or, if the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice must be documented on the plan of care, along with the reason the signature was not provided. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30011 Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility’s policy and procedure, the dialysis facility failed to ensure staff signed the patient’s plan of care the day of the Interdisciplinary (IDT) meeting for 2 of 3 peritoneal dialysis (PD) home therapy patients. (Patient 1 and 2) The findings include: Record review on 11/28/23 at 10:35 AM of PD Patient 1 revealed Patient 1 was admitted to the home therapy program on 08/17/23 with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Review of the patient’s chart revealed the “Patient Plan of Care” IDT meeting was held on 09/19/23. Further review revealed the Registered Nurse (RN) and Dietician signed the plan of care (POC) on 09/25/23, the Medical Director (MD) on 09/27/23, Patient 1 on 10/02/23, and no date noted for the Master Social Worker. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 2:47 PM, home therapy Registered Nurse (RN) 1 stated, “We are supposed to sign the IDT the same day as the meeting”. Record review on 11/28/23 at 11:32 AM for PD Patient 2 revealed Patient 2 was admitted to the home therapy program on 08/04/23 with a diagnosis of acute kidney failure. Review of the patient’s chart revealed the “Patient Plan of Care” IDT meeting was held on 09/22/23. Further review revealed the RN signed the POC on 09/25/23, the patient on 10/16/23, and there was no signature by the MD (Medical Director). During an interview on 11/29/23 at 3:10 PM, home therapy RN 1 verified the findings. Facility policy, titled, “Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Patient Assessment and Plan of Care”, revealed, “14. The patient’s plan of care will be completed by facility’s interdisciplinary team, including patient or personal representative and be signed by team members including the patient or the patient’s personal representative...”.”
-
Initial Poc Implemented - 30 Days/13 Tx
The inspectors’ words, 303 words
“POC-INITIAL IMPLEMENTED-30 DAYS/13 TX CFR(s): 494.90(b)(2) Implementation of the initial plan of care must begin within the latter of 30 calendar days after admission to the dialysis facility or 13 outpatient hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first outpatient dialysis session. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30011 Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility’s policy and procedure, the dialysis facility failed to ensure a plan of care was completed within 30 calendar days after admission or 13 outpatient hemodialysis treatments for 2 of 8 in-center dialysis patients. (Patient 8 and 9) The findings include: Record review on 11/28/23 at 3:18 PM for Patient 8 revealed Patient 8 was admitted to the dialysis facility on 04/04/23 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD). Review of the patient’s chart revealed the “Patient Plan of Care (POC)” was completed on 05/11/23 which was past 30 calendar days of admission and 13 outpatient hemodialysis treatments. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 9:20 AM, the Facility Administrator (FA) verified the findings. Record review on 11/28/23 at 10:41 AM for Patient 9 revealed Patient 9 was admitted to the dialysis facility on 04/27/23 with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic kidney disease. Review of the patient’s chart revealed the patient’s POC was completed on 06/08/23 which was past 30 calendar days of admission and 13 outpatient hemodialysis treatments. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 9:30 AM, the FA verified the findings. Facility policy, entitled, “Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Patient Assessment and Plan of Care”, revealed, “10. An initial Plan of Care, based on the findings from the comprehensive assessment, will be completed on all patients new to dialysis within 30 calendar days (or 13 outpatient dialysis sessions for hemodialysis) beginning with the first outpatient dialysis treatment or per state guidelines...”.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2023 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Aug 27, 2014.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 17 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 5 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (30 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 89% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 9 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Horry County, 9 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 5 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.