Hearth Record

Davita Fort Mill Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Fort Mill, South Carolina 29708

1975 Carolina Place Dr, Fort Mill, South Carolina 29708. (803) 802-3027.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 18, 2024: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 18, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 184 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41879 Based on observations and staff interview, the dialysis facility staff failed to follow standard infection control guidelines for cleaning dialysis machines between patients for one of three Patient Care Technicians (PCT’s) observed. (PCT #1) Findings include: On 07/17/2024 at 10:40 AM observations in the treatment area of the facility revealed PCT #1 cleaning dialysis station #6. PCT #1 is observed emptying clear liquid from the priming container at station #6 into the wall box and did not disinfect the priming container after emptying. PCT #1 then brought clean supplies for the next patient to Station #6 and placed on the chair side table with a new patient observed being seated at the station #6. During an interview on 07/17/2024 at 11:20 AM, PCT #1 verified the findings.”

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds

    The inspectors’ words, 151 words

    “IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41879 Based on observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy, “Medication Policy,” the dialysis facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 2 Registered Nurses (RN’s) failed to use aseptic technique when administering medication. (RN #3) Findings include: On 07/17/2024 at 10:45 AM observations in the treatment area revealed RN #3 administering Intravenous (IV) medication to a patient at Station #7. RN #3 did not wipe the saline port prior to administering the IV medication. During an interview on 07/17/2024 at 11:25 AM, RN #3 verified the findings. Facility policy, entitled “Medication Policy,” reads, “Medications are ordered and replaced prior to expiration,” and, “all teammates administering medication must utilize aseptic technique.””

    Rule V0143. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41879 Based on observations, staff interview and review of facility policy, “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities,” the dialysis facility failed to check and removed expired supplies from the patient care areas. The findings include: On 07/15/2024 at 9:30 AM observation of the treatment area revealed (24) vials of Vancomycin 50 mg (milligram) expired 07/01/2024 in a drawer in the patient care area. During an interview on 07/15/2024 at 10:00 AM, the Facility Administrator (FA) verified the findings. During an observation on 07/15/2024 at 9:35 AM of the patient treatment area revealed (8) intravenous (IV) administration sets expired on 02/12/2024. During an interview on 07/15/24 at 9:45 AM, the Facility Administrator verified the findings. Facility policy, entitled “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities,” reads, “Supplies must be rotated First in -First Out (FIFO) to ensure products maintain quality and do not expire. Appropriately dispose of items that have reached the expiration.””

    Rule V0401. Standard-level.

  • Poc Completed/Signed By Idt & Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 312 words

    “POC-COMPLETED/SIGNED BY IDT & PT CFR(s): 494.90(b)(1) The patient’s plan of care must- (i) Be completed by the interdisciplinary team, including the patient if the patient desires; and (ii) Be signed by the team members, including the patient or the patient’s designee; or, if the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice must be documented on the plan of care, along with the reason the signature was not provided. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41879 Based on record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, “Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Patient Assessment and Plan of Care,” the dialysis facility staff failed to ensure the patient signed an IDT care plan and/or document the reason for the delayed patient signature for one of seven patient charts reviewed. (Patient #7) Findings include: Record review on 7/17/2024 at 11:00 AM of Patient #7 revealed Patient #7 was admitted on 10/24/2023. Patient #7 has an IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) meeting dated 03/06/2024 with Patient #7 listed as unstable. Further review of the chart revealed Patient #7 signed the unstable IDT meeting treatment plans and goals on 04/25/2024 which was 49 days past the IDT meeting with no explanation for the late signature. During an interview on 07/17/24 at 1:46 PM, the Facility Administrator (FA) stated, “The IDT meeting and Plan of Care should have been reviewed with the patient and signed by the patient shortly after the meeting.” Facility policy, entitled “Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Patient Assessment and Plan of Care,” reads, “The patient’s plan of care will be completed by the facility’s IDT, including patient or personal representative and be signed by team members including the patient or patient’s personal representative. If the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice will be documented on the plan of care, along wit the reason the signature was not provided.””

    Rule V0556. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 18, 2024Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 27, 2006.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 30 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in York County, 4 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.