Hearth Record

Fresenius Medical Care Camden

A dialysis facility in Camden, South Carolina 29020

7 Haile Lane, Camden, South Carolina 29020. (803) 425-9000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 4, 2024: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 4, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Ic - Sanitary Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 483 words

    “IC-SANITARY ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.30 The dialysis facility must provide and monitor a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents within and between the unit and any adjacent hospital or other public areas. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22313 Based on observations, record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff followed accepted principles of infection control in the renal setting for patients performing hand hygiene when arriving and exiting the dialysis treatment room. (3 random patients). Random observations showed staff failed to clean stethoscopes between dialysis stations and one of Patient Care Technician (PCT #5) retrieved trash from the dialysis treatment room floof without removing the soiled glove and performing hand hygience. (PCT #5) The findings include: Upon the initial tour on 1/2/2024 at 9:30 AM, random observations in the dialysis treatment rooms revealed 3 random patients did not perform hand hygiene when arriving and prior to exiting the dialysis treatment room after holding their access sites post dialysis. In an interview on 1/4/2024 at 12:00 PM, the Facility Manager and Charge Nurse reported “The people get so busy”. Facility policy, entitled, “Hand Hygiene”, reads, “Decontaminated using Alcohol based hand rub or by washing hands with antimicrobial soap and water 1) Before and after direct contact with patients 2) Entering and leaving the treatment area 3) before performing any invasive procedure such as vascular access cannulation or administration of medications 4) immediately after removing gloves 5) After contact with body fluids ...or non-intact skin or wound dressings 6) After contact with inanimate objects near the patients (stethoscopes). Patients should perform hand hygiene if able prior to and after each dialysis treatment”. Concerning the hair, Employee Dress Code reads: “To ensure employees maintain a work environment that adheres to safety and infection control the following applies: “Hair must be securely dept away from the face so as not to create an infection control and/or safety risk”. 41743 Observations on 01/03/2024 between 9:12 AM and 11:29 AM revealed Patient Care Technicians (PCT) #5 picked trash off the dialysis treatment room floor with gloved hands at 10:37 AM. Then PCT #5 failed to remove the glove and perform hand hygiene prior to touching the dialysis machine computer screen. Observations showed Registered Nurse (RN) #2 and #3, Patient Care Technicians (PCT) #1 and #2 wearing stethoscopes around their necks and failing to sanitize the stethoscope bell between patients. On 01/04/2024 at 11:00 AM, the Charge Nurse reported “Should be cleaning”. Facility policy, entitled, “Cleaning and disinfecting the Dialysis Station”, revealed, “After use, any non-disposable equipment and supplies brought into the dialysis station (ex. Stethoscope) must be disinfected with 1:100 bleach or EPA registered disinfectant before being removed from the dialysis station” and “The electronic charting device incorporated in the 2008 T dialysis machine is not considered a clean area. Gloves will be required when touching either the screen or keyboard”.”

    Rule V0111. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Transducer Protectors: Not Wetted/Changed

    The inspectors’ words, 435 words

    “IC-TRANSDUCER PROTECTORS-NOT WETTED/CHANGED CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Use external venous and arterial pressure transducer filters/protectors for each patient treatment to prevent blood contamination of the dialysis machines’ pressure monitors. If the external transducer protector becomes wet, replace immediately and inspect the protector. If fluid is visible on the side of the transducer protector that faces the machine, have qualified personnel open the machine after the treatment is completed and check for contamination. This includes inspection for possible blood contamination of the internal pressure tubing set and pressure sensing port. If contamination has occurred, the machine must be taken out of service and disinfected using either 1:100 dilution of bleach (300-600 mg/L free chlorine) or a commercially available, EPA-registered tuberculocidal germicide before reuse. Change filters/protectors between each patient treatment, and do not reuse them. Internal transducer filters do not need to be changed routinely between patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41743 Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, entitled, “Maintenance of Transducer Protector Procedure”, the dialysis staff failed to change a wet external transducer protector in a timely manner and failed to follow the facility’s policy and procedure for potential dialysis machine contamination. Registered Nurse (RN) #3 and Patient Care Technician (PCT) #1 and #3). The finding includes: Observations on 01/03/2024 between 10:25 AM and 10:58 AM revealed red fluid on the front of the external transducer protector for dialysis station #19. RN #3 observed at the computer at 10:26 AM, but failed to change the wet external transducer protector. PCT #3 was observed at the computer at 10:40 AM, but failed to change the wet external transducer protector. End of treatment at 10:58 AM, PCT #1 removed tubing but failed to observe the external wet transducer protector. When PCT #1 was requested to check the back of the wet external transducer protector and explain the facility’s procedure for checking for potential contamination, PCT #1 reported, “If wet, machine should be not used by another patient till checked.” Observations showed the back of the wet external transducer protector had no wetness or fluid breakthrough. PCT #1 observed later removing the dialysis machine from the dialysis treatment room. Facility policy, entitled, “Maintenance of Transducer Protector Procedure” reveals, “External transducer protectors must be changed immediately when they become wet with blood or other fluid. Wet external transducer protectors must be thoroughly examined to determine if any blood or other fluid contamination is visible on the machine side (back) of the transducer protector prior to replacement. If no evidence of blood or fluid contamination is evident, no further action is required other than replacing the wet transducer.”.”

    Rule V0120. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds

    The inspectors’ words, 232 words

    “IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41743 Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility’s policy, entitled, “Medication Preparation and Administration”, two of two dialysis Registered Nurses (RN) failed to sanitize intravenous ports or multidose vial septums prior to administering medications or needle insertions. (RN # 2 and RN #3). The findings include: Observations on 01/03/2024 at 10:22 AM revealed RN #3 administering medication via intravenous catheter port without first sanitizing the intravenous port with alcohol. Observations on 01/04/2024 at 10:05 AM revealed RN #2 removed medication from a multi-dose vial without sanitizing vial’s septum with alcohol for 3 needle insertions. On 01/04/2024 at 11:00 AM with the Charge Nurse revealed “part of policy”. Dialysis policy, entitled, “Medication Preparation and Administration”, revealed, “Infection Control. Disinfect IV ports prior to accessing, using friction and 70% alcohol, iodophor or chlorhexidine/alcohol agent. Cleanse the diaphragm with a new alcohol wipe each time an IV port is accessed. Cleanse the diaphragm of a vial with alcohol prior to accessing the vial. If the vial is a multidose vial, cleanse the diaphragm with a new alcohol pad each time the vial is accessed with a needle using friction and 70% (percent) alcohol.”

    Rule V0143. Standard-level.

  • Assess B/P & Fluid Management Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “PA-ASSESS B/P, FLUID MANAGEMENT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Blood pressure, and fluid management needs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41743 Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility’s policy, entitled, “Intradialytic Hypotension”, the facility staff failed to monitor Blood Pressure (BP) and patient status every 30 minutes for 2 of 7 patient charts. (Patient #2 and #3) The finding includes: On 01/03/2024 at 2:10 PM, chart review for Patient #2 revealed documentation for 12/14/2023 dialysis treatment for vital signs at 2:58 PM: BP 153/61 and at 3:56 PM: BP 144/59. This was 58 minutes between patient assessments. On 01/04/2024 at 11:07 AM, the Charge Nurse verified the finding. On 01/03/2024 at 2:40 PM, chart review for Patient #3 revealed documentation for vital signs on 12/12/2023 dialysis treatment at 11:04 AM: BP 160/80 and at 1:04 PM: BP 143/73. This was 2 hours between patient assessments. the dialysis treatment on 12/16/2023 revealed vital signs at 11:30 AM: BP 123/69 and at 1:30 PM: BP 96/59. This was 60 minutes between patient assessments. Dialysis treatment on 12/23/2023 revealed vital signs at 12:43 PM: BP 100/40 and at 1:38 PM: BP 123/59. This was 55 minutes between patient assessments. On 1/03/2024 at 11:14 AM , the Charge Nurse verified the findings. Dialysis policy, entitled, “Intradialytic Hypotension”, revealed, “Prevention of Intradialytic Hypotension Monitor BP at least every 30 minutes during treatment-recheck potentially aberrant readings”.”

    Rule V0504. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 4, 2024Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 1, 1980.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 21 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (41 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 53% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Kershaw County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Fresenius Medical Care of Lugoff Elgin3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.