Fkc Back Mountain
A dialysis facility in Dallas, Pennsylvania 18612
130 Crossfield Drive, Dallas, Pennsylvania 18612. (570) 761-6140.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 13 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 7, 2024: a standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 7, 2024: standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Initial Poc Implemented - 30 Days/13 Tx
The inspectors’ words, 333 words
“POC-INITIAL IMPLEMENTED-30 DAYS/13 TX CFR(s): 494.90(b)(2) Implementation of the initial plan of care must begin within the latter of 30 calendar days after admission to the dialysis facility or 13 outpatient hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first outpatient dialysis session. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19122 Based on review of facility policies/procedures and clinical records, and based on interview with the clinical manager (Employee #1), the facility failed to ensure the initial plan of care (POC) was developed as per facility policy and procedure for one (1) of two (2) patients for whom chronic hemodialysis treatments began after December 1, 2023. (Patient #3) Findings include: On March 7, 2024 at approximately 4:06 PM, review of facility policy 45283, titled “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care” revealed the following: on page 2: An initial...plan of care (POC) must be conducted on all patients new to dialysis within...13 outpatient hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first outpatient dialysis session. Patient #3: On March 7, 2024 at approximately 10:24 AM, review of the medical record revealed the chronic hemodialysis start of care date was 01/24/2024. Review of hemodialysis treatment documentation revealed the thirteenth hemodialysis treatment (session) was completed on 02/28/2024. There was no documentation in the clinical record which provided evidence the initial POC was completed by 02/28/2024. During interview conducted on March 7, 2024 at approximately 12:04 PM, the CM reported the initial POC is scheduled to be conducted on 03/20/2024 so that family members can attend. There was no documentation in the medical record which provided evidence that the patient and/or family requested a delay in the initial POC meeting. During interview conducted on March 7, 2024 at approximately 4:20 PM, the CM confirmed that the delay in the development of the initial POC was related to availability issues for the patient’s nephrologist. During interview conducted on March 7, 2024 at approximately 4:20 PM, the CM confirmed the initial POC for patient #3 was not developed by the thirteenth hemodialysis treatment.”
-
Continuously Monitor/Take Action/Track/Sustain Improve
The inspectors’ words, 1,058 words
“QAPI-MONITOR/ACT/TRACK/SUSTAIN IMPROVE CFR(s): 494.110(b) The dialysis facility must continuously monitor its performance, take actions that result in performance improvements, and track performance to ensure that improvements are sustained over time. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19122 Based on review of facility policies/procedures, clinical records and documentation, observation, staff interview (Employee #3) and interview with the clinical manager (Employee #1), the facility failed to ensure planned actions were completed for two (2) of two (2) action plans (performance improvement projects). (Action Plans #1 and #2) Findings include: On March 7, 2024 at approximately 11:42 AM, review of facility policy 26799, titled “Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program” revealed the following on page 5: Following root cause analysis, action plans will be determined...The facility must take immediate and appropriate actions to address any serious threats and ensure patient safety. During observation of hemodialysis staff between March 4, 2024 at approximately 9:45 AM and March 6, 2024 at approximately 11:01 AM revealed the following: Employee #2: After inserting the access needles into the fistula and completing the treatment initiation process for the patient seated at station #12 during the second shift on 03/05/2024, the registered nurse (RN) carried the laboratory specimen to the lab room. After departure from the laboratory specimen room, the RN removed gloves but failed to perform hand disinfection/washing before obtaining a clean pair of gloves from the supply box. After removing the access needles from the fistula from the patient seated at station #4 during the second shift on 03/05/2024, the RN removed gloves but failed to perform hand disinfection/washing before obtaining additional clean supplies to complete the hemodialysis treatment termination process. After removing one (1) blood line from the central venous catheter (CVC) for the patient seated at station #6 during the first shift on 03/06/2024, the RN removed gloves but failed to perform hand disinfection/washing before obtaining a new pair of gloves from the supply box. The RN then removed the second blood line but failed to perform hand disinfection/washing after completion of the treatment termination process. Employee #3: After inserting the access needles into the fistula for the patient seated at station #1 during the second shift on 03/05/2024, the RN entered the medication preparation room without removing personal protective equipment (gown and gloves), The RN then proceeded to remove gloves but failed to perform hand disinfection/washing before preparing an intravenous (IV) medication. During interview conducted on 03/05/2024, the RN reported that the IV medication which the RN prepared was heparin. Employee #4: After removing the bloodlines from the access needles for the patient seated at station #5 on the first shift on 03/06/2024, the certified clinical hemodialysis technician (CCHT) removed gloves but failed to perform hand disinfection/washing before obtaining a clean pair of gloves from the supply box. Patient #1: On March 6, 2024 at approximately 1:22 PM review of the medical record revealed the blood/bloodline culture obtained on 12/30/2023 was positive for growth of viridans streptococcal group (bacteria). Patient #3: On March 7, 2024 at approximately 10:24 AM review of the medical record revealed the blood/CVC culture obtained on 02/09/2024 was positive for growth of staphylococcus huminis (bacteria). Patient #4: On March 7, 2024 at approximately 12:19 PM, review of laboratory results included in the medical record revealed the patient is hepatitis C reactive (positive). Patient #5: On March 7, 2024 at approximately 1:37 PM, review of the medical record revealed Vancomycin (antibiotic) was administered on 01/26/2024 after assessment findings documented by the RN (Employee #1) revealed the CVC site exhibited greater than expected redness and tenderness at insertion site. Action Plan #1: On March 6, 2026 at approximately 11:56 AM, review of an “Action Plan” implemented on 01/12/2024 revealed the following: Analysis of Findings (Root Causes)/Goals: Goal for 100% adherence to infection control policies and procedures by the end of the increased auditing period. Actions Planned/Time Frame/Person Responsible: -Infection control audits increased to twice weekly; -Staff Acknowledgment to be signed regarding infection control policies and where to find applicable polices; -Time Frame: Increased auditing period over 6 weeks; -Person responsible: Clinical manager (CM). Review of infection control audit findings documentation revealed week six (6) of the twice weekly infection control audits was completed on 03/01/2024. There was no documentation the CM (Employee #1) completed the planned action for hemodialysis staff to sign an acknowledgment regarding infection control policies and where to find applicable polices. Patient #4: On March 7, 2024 at approximately 12:19 PM, review of the medical record revealed the following was documented on the hemodialysis treatment sheet dated 02/26/2024: -8:03 AM: 200 milliliters (ml) of normal saline solution (NSS) was administered for blood pressure of 85/38 which was obtained at 8:01 AM, The next blood pressure assessment (91/47) was documented as having been completed at 8:29 AM which was 26 minutes after the administration of NSS. -9:31 AM: 100 ml of NSS was administered for a blood pressure of 82/40, The next blood pressure assessment (89/44) was documented as having been completed at 10:00 AM which was 29 minutes after the administration of NSS. Action Plan #2: On March 6, 2026 at approximately 11:58 AM, review of an “Action Plan” implemented on 01/14/2024 revealed the following: Analysis of Findings (Root Causes)/Goals: Goal to achieve medical record documentation which is free from omission or errors. Actions Planned/Time Frame/Person Responsible: -CM to pull 4 treatment records from the treatment week to review errors with staff the following week. -Time Frame: Increased treatment sheet auditing period over 6 weeks starting 01/22/2024. -Person responsible: Clinical manager will audit treatment sheet records, provide feedback to staff and documents updates in the action plan. Review of treatment sheet audit documentation revealed during week 1 (01/22/2024 through 01/25/2024), one (1) instance of low blood pressure with fluid administration did not include a recheck of the patient until 14 minutes later when “ideally”, the need to recheck the patient is within 5 to 7 minutes. There was no documentation the CM (Employee #1) completed the planned action to review treatment sheet omissions/errors with staff the following week and to provide feedback to staff as required in the above referenced action plan. During interview conducted on March 7, 2024 at approximately 4:20 PM, the CM confirmed the above referenced planned actions were not completed as per the requirements included in action plans #1 and #2.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2024 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Mar 26, 2021.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 13 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 8 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Luzerne County, 7 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Fkc Wilkes Barre | 2 |
| Fkc Hazleton | 5 |
| Fkc Pittston | 2 |
| Fkc Nanticoke | 3 |
| Innovative Renal Care Greater Hazleton | 3 |
| Fkc Freedom Center of Wyoming Valley | 5 |
| Davita Wilkes Barre Dialysis | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.