Hearth Record

Prodigy-Home Dialysis Care

A dialysis facility in Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15905

88 Osborne Street, Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15905. (814) 299-4673.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 30, 2026: a standard inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 30, 2026: standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Ic - Hbv - Vaccinate Patients & Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 517 words

    “IC-HBV-VACCINATE PTS/STAFF CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Hepatitis B Vaccination Vaccinate all susceptible patients and staff members against hepatitis B. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44820 Based on review of facility policy, OSHA standards, and personnel files (PF), and interviews with staff (EMP), the facility failed to maintain/obtain Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination records and failed to obtain statements attesting to the employee having received the vaccine with dates (or approximate dates) signed by the employee for three (3) of four (4) personnel files (PF#1-4). Findings: Review of facility policy on January 30, 2026, at 8:20 a.m. revealed: “Infection Control Manual... G. Hepatitis B Vaccination... Personnel files should demonstrate compliance with this regulation: OSHA requires facilities to maintain a record of their employees ’ Hepatitis B immunization history and to contact past employers to obtain records of vaccination, if applicable. OSHA requires these records be maintained for 30 years after the person leaves employment. If the employee states he/she has been vaccinated, but the records are not obtainable, the personnel record must include a statement attesting to the employee having received the vaccine with dates (or approximate dates) signed by the employee...” Review of OSHA “Hepatitis B Vaccination Protection”... “OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standards” on January 30, 2026, at approximately 8:40 a.m., “1910.1030(f) Hepatitis B Vaccination and Post-Exposure Evaluation and Follow-up -- 1910.1030(f)(1) ... 1910.1030(f)(2) Hepatitis B Vaccination. 1910.1030(f)(2)(i) Hepatitis B vaccination shall be made available ... to all employees who have occupational exposure unless the employee has previously received the complete hepatitis vaccination series, antibody testing has revealed that the employee is immune, or the vaccine is contraindicated for medical reasons. ... 1910.1030(f)(6) Medical Recordkeeping. Medical records required by this standard shall be maintained in accordance with paragraph (h)(1) of this section. ... 1910.1030(h)(1) Medical Records. 1910.1030(h)(1)(i) The employer shall establish and maintain an accurate record for each employee with occupational exposure, in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020 [requires 30 year maintenance of HBV vaccination records]. ... 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii) This record shall include: ...1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(B) A copy of the employee’s hepatitis B vaccination status including the dates of all the hepatitis B vaccinations and any special records relative to the employee’s ability to receive vaccinations as required by paragraph (f)(2);” Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1030 Review of Clinical staff/direct patient care personnel files (PF) was conducted on January 14, 2026 at approximately 1:00 pm revealed: PF1 (social worker) date of hire (DOH): 2/1/2020 - did not contain dates when PF1 received the complete hepatitis B vaccine series to ensure immunity would be sustained. PF2 (dietitian) date of hire (DOH): 11/6/2025- did not contain dates when PF2 received the complete hepatitis B vaccine series to ensure immunity would be sustained. PF4 (registered nurse) date of hire (DOH): 8/4/2025 - did not contain dates when PF4 received the complete hepatitis B vaccine series to ensure immunity would be sustained. Interview with facility administrator on 1/30/26, at approximately 10:10 a.m. confirmed above employees were vaccinated against hepatitis B at some point but that their files lacked dates when they received their vaccines. “Labwork results showed immunity. I do not have vaccination records or attestations.””

    Rule V0126. Standard-level.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 410 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44820 Based on review of policy/procedure, observations and an interview with the Facility administrator, interview with employees (EMP); the facility Medical Director failed to ensure all personnel adhere to facillity policies and procedures for three (3) of three (3) observations (OBS). (OBS#1-3). Findings include: Review of policy on 1/14/26 at approximately 9:00 AM revealed: “Policy Section 3 - Medications... Purpose: All medication in the facility should be stored safely and effectively and routinely checked to ensure integrity and to provide the patient with a safe, therapeutic treatment... Procedure:... 4. Medication inventory is to be chedked monthly. Assess for: ... b. expired (outdated) medication... 7. Multi-dose vials, once opened are to be stored according to manufacturer’s recommendations. 8. Inspect each open vial and bottle each day for the following... b. Date (month/day/year) vial was opened; c. Initials of staff memeber who opened the vial; 9. Discard medication if: a. Expired; b. Opened without completed date and/or initials; c. Opened for longer than 30 days or as per manufacturer’s recommendations...” Review of policy on 1/14/26 at approximately 1:30 PM revealed: “Subject: Roles and Responsibilities... (c) Policies and Procedures... The medical director must:... (ii) Ensure that - All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility...” OBS #1 conducted on 1/14/26 at approximately 9:15 AM revealed one (1) opened bottle of Exsept Plus - Antimicrobial Exit Site, skin and wound cleanser with a documented open date of “6/18/25”, no documented staff intitials. OBS #2 conducted on 1/14/26 at approximately 9:15 AM revealed 11 Expired “minicap with providine-iodine solution”; Lot # 24F27H15; Expiration date: 2025-11-28” located/stored in a blue bin in peritoneal dialysis patient exam room. Interview with EMP3 “We have those in the bin to use for patients in need of peritoneal dialysis catheter cap changes.” OBS#3 conducted on 1/14/26 at approximately 9:15 revealed one (1) open vial of “Heparin 30,000 USP units per 30ml” medication vial labed “opened 1/9/26” void of staff initials. An interview with the Facility Administrator completed on 1/23/24 at approximately 11:45AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level.

  • Medical Records - Complete, Accurate, Accessible

    The inspectors’ words, 550 words

    “MR-COMPLETE, ACCURATE, ACCESSIBLE CFR(s): 494.170 The dialysis facility must maintain complete, accurate, and accessible records on all patients, including home patients who elect to receive dialysis supplies and equipment from a supplier that is not a provider of ESRD services and all other home dialysis patients whose care is under the supervision of the facility. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44820 Based on review of policy/procedure, medical records (MR) and interview with the facility Administrator the clinic failed to ensure documentation was completed with signatures and/or dates for five (5) of five (5) records reviewed. (MR #1-#5). Findings include: Review of Registered Dietitian (RD) Policy #GB-07 “Home Dialysis Care Telehealth Nutrition Services; date adopted 11/17/25...” on 1/13/26 at approximately 1:45PM revealed: “... 6.2 Telehealth Visit Requirements... The RD must Review all required components including: Laboratory data...” Review of policy/procedure on 1/13/26 at approximately 2:00PM revealed: “Subject: Section 8 - Dietary Services... To ensure that the facility is in compliance with the required documentation of Dietary Services, the Nurse Manage will do a chart audit... Dietitian’s Responsibility 1. Provide ongoing monitoring of subjective and objective data to determine the need for timely intervention and follow-up. Measurement criteria include, but are not limited to, weight changes, blood chemistries, adequacy of dialysis and medication, which affect nutrition status and potentially cause adver nutrient interactions... Documentation corresponding with the patient’s care plan will be noted on a monthly basis or as needed...” Review of medical records on 1/15/26 between approximately 9:00AM and 11:00AM revealed the following: MR#1, Admit Date: 10/1/2024; Monthly Lab Results date of service (DOS): 10/30/2025 - void of RD, Registered Nurse (RN), Physician, Social Worker signature that labs were reviewed; Monthly Plan of Care DOS: 10/30/2025 - void of RD signature, no monthly note documented for review to verify staff participation. MR#2, Admit Date: 4/24/2025; Monthly Lab Results date of service (DOS): 12/11/2025- void of RD, Registered Nurse (RN), Physician, Social Worker signature that labs were reviewed; Monthly Plan of Care DOS: 12/11/2025 - void of RD signature, void of Social Worker signature, no monthly note documented for review to verify staff participation. MR#3, Admit Date: 9/19/2025; Monthly Lab Results date of service (DOS): 12/11/2025- void of RD, Registered Nurse (RN), Physician, Social Worker signature that labs were reviewed; Monthly Plan of Care DOS: 12/11/2025 - void of RD signature, void of Social Worker signature, no monthly note documented for review to verify staff participation. MR#4, Admit Date: 4/24/2023; Monthly Lab Results date of service (DOS): 11/13/2025 and 12/9/2025- void of RD, Registered Nurse (RN), Physician, Social Worker signature; Monthly Plan of Care DOS: 11/13/2025 and 12/11/2025 - void of RD signature, void of Social Worker signature, no monthly note documented for review to verify staff participation. MR#5, Admit Date: 9/9/2024; Monthly Lab Results date of service (DOS): 10/30/2025 - void of RD, Registered Nurse (RN), Physician, Social Worker signature; Monthly Plan of Care DOS: 10/30/2025 - void of RD signature, no monthly note documented for review to verify staff participation. Interview with Facility Administrator completed 1/15/2026 at approximately 2:30PM confirmed above findings and policy/procedure to be current. Administrator states “We are working on the policies. The dietitian we had quit and we hired a new one that started in the middle of November to fill the position.””

    Rule V0726. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 30, 2026Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 7, 2020.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer in-center hemodialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 0 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, better than expected; hospital admissions, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Cambria County, 6 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.