Hearth Record

Davita St Luke’s Whitehall Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Whitehall, Pennsylvania 18052

1220 3rd Street, Whitehall, Pennsylvania 18052. (610) 266-1706.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 2, 2025: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 2, 2025: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care

    The inspectors’ words, 411 words

    “IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on review of facility policy, observations, and an interview with the Facility Administrator, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed infection control protocols, included but not limited to, preventing intravascular catheter-related infections, for one (1) of one (1) ‘Initiation of Dialysis with Central Venous Catheter’ observations (Observation #1) and for two (2) of two (2) ‘Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Exit Site Care’ observations (Observations #1, Observation #2). Findings include: A review was conducted of facility policy on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:30 p.m. Policy:1-04-02B ‘Central Venous Catheter (CVC) with Clearguard HD Antimicrobial End Caps Procedure’ ‘Procedure’ (1) “....Put on PPE and provide a mask to the patient. Teammate and patient will wear masks covering the nose and mouth during this procedure.” Observations conducted in patient treatment area on June 30, 2025 between approximately 8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. revealed the following: Observation #1: During observation #1 of ‘Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Exit Site Care’ and ‘Initiation of Dialysis with Central Venous Catheter’ on 06/30/2025 at approximately 11:00 a.m. of patient #6, station #10; Employee #5 failed to ensure the patients face mask was covering the patients nose throughout the procedure. Observation #2: During observation #2 of ‘Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Exit Site Care’ on 06/30/2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m. of patient #3, station #2; Employee #6 failed to ensure the patient wore a face mask covering their nose and mouth throughout the procedure. An interview conducted with the facility Administrator on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:45 p.m. and on July 2, 2025 at approximately 8:45 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0147. Standard-level.

  • Softeners - Automatically Regenerated/Timers/Salt/Salt Level

    The inspectors’ words, 398 words

    “SOFTENERS-AUTO REGENERATE/TIMERS/SALT LVL CFR(s): 494.40(a) 5.2.4 Softeners: auto regen/timers/salt/salt level Prior to exhaustion, softeners should be restored; that is, new exchangeable sodium ions are placed on the resin by a process known as “regeneration,” which involves exposure of the resin bed to a saturated sodium chloride solution. 5.2.4 Softeners Refer to RD62:2001, 4.3.10 Automatically regenerated water softeners: Automatically regenerated water softeners shall be fitted with a mechanism to prevent water containing the high concentrations of sodium chloride used during regeneration from entering the product water line during regeneration. The face of the timers used to control the regeneration cycle should be visible to the user. 6.2.4 Softeners Timers should be checked at the beginning of each day and should be interlocked with the RO system so that the RO is stopped when a softener regeneration cycle is initiated. The softener brine tank should be monitored daily to ensure that a saturated salt solution exists in the brine tank. Salt pellets should fill at least half the tank. Salt designated as rock salt should not be used for softener regeneration since it is not refined and typically contains sediments and other impurities that may damage O-rings and pistons and clog orifices in the softener control head. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on a request of facility policy, observations, and an interview with the facility Administrator, the facility failed to ensure salt pellets filled at least half of the brine tank in the water treatment room, for one (1) of one (1) observations (Observation #1). Findings include: Facility policy related to the water room brine tank was requested on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:30 p.m. Per the Administrator, there is no specific policy. No specific policy provided. The facility Daily Water Treatment Log was provided for review. ‘Monitored Process or Component’, section #10, ‘Salt Level in Brine?’ ‘Acceptable Limit(s)’ “Tank at least half full, above the water (Y/N/NA)”. Observations conducted in patient treatment/water treatment areas on June 30, 2025 between approximately 8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. revealed the following: Observation #1: During obervations of the water treatment area on 06/30/25 at approximately 8:34 a.m., the brine tank was observed to be approximately 1/4 full of salt. An interview conducted with the facility Administrator on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:45 p.m. and on July 2, 2025 at approximately 8:45 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0190. Standard-level.

  • Frequency - Initial: 30 Days/13 Tx

    The inspectors’ words, 268 words

    “PA-FREQUENCY-INITIAL-30 DAYS/13 TX CFR(s): 494.80(b)(1) An initial comprehensive assessment must be conducted on all new patients (that is, all admissions to a dialysis facility), within the latter of 30 calendar days or 13 hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first dialysis session. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on review of facility policy, medical records, and an interview with the facility Administrator, the facility failed to ensure an initial comprehensive assessment was conducted on all new patients (that is, all admissions to a dialysis facility), within the latter of 30 calendar days or 13 hemodialysis sessions, for three (3) of three (3) patient medical records (MRs) reviewed. (MR#2, MR#3, MR#5). Findings: A review was conducted of facility policy on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:30 p.m. Policy 1-14-01 ‘New Patient’ ‘Assessment’ states “Within 30 days of admission to facility ....” ‘Plan of Care’ states “Within 30 days of admission to facility (or within 13 treatments) for new patients ......” A review of medical records was completed on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:30 p.m. Patients admission date is listed below. MR#2, Date of admission 2/29/24: Patients initial interdisciplinary comprehensive assessment was conducted on 4/24/24. Fifty-four (54) days after admission. MR#3, Date of admission 10/07/24: Patients initial interdisciplinary comprehensive assessment was conducted on 11/20/24. Forty-five (45) days after admission. MR#5, Date of admission 6/27/24: Patients initial interdisciplinary comprehensive assessment was conducted on 7/31/24. Thirty-four (34) days after admission. An interview conducted with the facility Administrator on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:45 p.m. and on July 2, 2025 at approximately 8:45 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0516. Standard-level.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 314 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on a review of facility policy, water treatment equipment records, and an interview with the facility Administrator, the facility failed to ensure facility forms were completed per policy/procedure,for one (1) of one (1) water treatment equipment records reviewed. (Record #1). Findings: A review was conducted of facility policy on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:30 p.m. ‘Procedure: 1-20-05C’ ‘Granuflo Concentrate Dissolution Unit II (99 gallon) Mixing Procedure’ includes ‘Materials required:’ “....’Granuflo 99 Gallon Batch Production Record’....” (Note: The facility utilizes a (132) Gallon drum. No other facility policy/procedure provided.) A review of water treatment equipment records was completed on July 1, 2025 at approximately 11:00 a.m. Record #1: ‘Granuflo (132) Gallon Batch Production Records’ were reviewed and included the following omissions: 08/04/23: Ca++ and K+ sections blank with no entries. 08/21/23: Ca++ and K+ sections blank with no entries. 09/06/23: Ca++ and K+ sections blank with no entries. 11/08/23: Ca++ and K+ sections blank with no entries. ‘Dissolution Tank Serial Number’ blank with no entry. 11/22/23: Ca++ and K+ sections blank with no entries. ‘Dissolution Tank Serial Number’ blank with no entry. “09/09” (No complete date): ‘Licensed Nurse Signature’ blank with no entry. 10/05/24: Ca++ and K+ sections blank with no entries. 12/02/24: ‘Licensed Nurse Signature’ blank with no entry. 05/12/25: ‘Dissolution Tank Serial Number’ blank with no entry. 05/23/25: ‘Dissolution Tank Serial Number’ blank with no entry. An interview conducted with the facility Administrator on July 1, 2025 at approximately 2:45 p.m. and on July 2, 2025 at approximately 8:45 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 2, 2025Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Apr 26, 2016.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 13 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Lehigh County, 9 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 4 of 5, 6 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.