Hearth Record

Davita Buttonwood Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19123

449 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19123. (215) 238-1201.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 1, 2024: a standard inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 1, 2024: standard inspection5 deficiencies
  • Esrd Ep Training Program

    The inspectors’ words, 694 words

    “ESRD EP Training Program CFR(s): §494.62(d)(1): Condition for Coverage: (d)(1) Training program. The dialysis facility must do all of the following: (i) Provide initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. Staff training must: (iii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures, including informing patients of- (A) What to do; (B) Where to go, including instructions for occasions when the geographic area of the dialysis facility must be evacuated; (C) Whom to contact if an emergency occurs while the patient is not in the dialysis facility. This contact information must include an alternate emergency phone number for the facility for instances when the dialysis facility is unable to receive phone calls due to an emergency situation (unless the facility has the ability to forward calls to a working phone number under such emergency conditions); and (D) How to disconnect themselves from the dialysis machine if an emergency occurs. (iv) Demonstrate that, at a minimum, its patient care staff maintains current CPR certification; and (v) Properly train its nursing staff in the use of emergency equipment and emergency drugs. (vi) Maintain documentation of the training. (vii) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the dialysis facility must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45377 Based on a review of medical records (MR), facility policies, and an interview with the administrator, the facility did not follow its policy regarding the performance of quarterly fire safety/emergency/disaster preparedness drills for ten (10) of eleven (11) MR reviewed: MR#2, MR#3, MR#4, MR#5, MR#6, MR#7, MR#8, MR#9, MR#10, and MR#11. Findings include: A review of the following policies were conducted on July 31, 2024 at 8:00 AM: Policy 4-07-01 The Facility Emergency Management Plan (ICHD, Home) states in part: “Emergency Management Plan Section b. Patients, ii. Quarterly, 1. Fire Safety Preparedness, 2. Emergency Take-off procedures.” Policy 5-01-21 Home Dialysis Monitoring and Ongoing Patient Education reads in part, The following need to be reviewed at least quarterly: Emergency/Disaster Preparedness.” A review of MRs was conducted on July 30, 2024 starting at 12:00 PM and again on July 31, 2024 starting at 8:00 AM. The admission date (AD) is indicated below. MR#2 AD 07/27/2019 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 3rd quarter of 2024, nor in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarters of 2023. MR#3 AD 06/3/2020 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarters of 2023. MR#4 AD 11/07/2019 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 2nd quarter of 2024, nor in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarters of 2023. MR#5 AD 03/11/2022 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 3rd quarter of 2024, nor in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarters of 2023. MR#6 AD 08/29/2016 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarters of 2023. MR#7 AD 04/19/2021 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarters of 2023. MR#8 AD 04/02/2009 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarters of 2023. MR#9 AD 06/21/2019 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarters of 2023. MR#10 AD 08/07/2023 did not contain evidence that fire safety preparedness was reviewed with the patient at the time of admission, nor in the 4th quarter of 2023. MR#11 AD 12/18/2020 did not contain evidence that quarterly fire safety preparedness drills were conducted in the 2nd quarter of 2024, nor in the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2023. An interview conducted with the administrator and regional home program manager on August 1, 2024 starting at 10:15 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule E0038. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 283 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45377 Based on observations (OBS) of the Dialysis Storage Area, a review of facility policies, a review of infection control documents, and an interview with the administrator, the facility failed to remove expired supplies for one (1) of four (4)observations: OBS#4 Findings include: A review of the following facility policies took place on July 30, 2024 starting at approximately 8:20 AM. Policy 5-06-01 Infection Control For Dialysis Facilities reads in part, “Supplies will be stored in a manner that maintains their integrity.” Observation #4 took place in the Water Treatment/Storage Area from 9:00 AM to 9:30 AM on 07/30/2024. The observation revealed the following: Non-Injectable Catheter Caps, 3 boxes, each with a quantity of 100 were found to be expired: Box #1 contained 91 remaining caps, lot#1900070, use by date of 5/7/2022; Box #2 contained 100 caps, lot#1900070, use by date of 5/7/2022; Box #3 contained 100 caps, lot#2200078, use by date 5/6/2022. Becton-Dickinson (BD) Microtainer Contact-Activated Lancet, 1 box with a quantity of 200 contained 90 remaining lancets, lot#y9MM8A2, expired 11/30/2023. Actamedical Administration Infusion Sets Y-Site found 12 sets, lot#20210727, expired 07/26/2024. Webcol Covidien Alcohol Prep Pads, 2 boxes, each with a quantity of 200 were found with a manufacturers date of 2013 on the boxes. Box #1 contained 124 remaining alcohol pads, lot#15F019462X; Box #2 contained 192 remaining alcohol pads, lot#15G200562X. An interview conducted with the administrator and regional home program manager on August 1, 2024 starting at 10:15 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0401. Standard-level.

  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 1,026 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45377 Based on review of facility policies, medical records (MR), hemodialysis (HD) treatment records, peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment records, and an interview with the facility administrator, the facility did not address abnormal findings per the facility’s policy and/or did not conduct post treatment nursing assessments for hemodialysis (HD) patients for three (3) of nine (9) HD MR reviewed: MR# 6, MR#7, and MR#9, and did not provide evidence that pertinent clinical data was captured for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients for two (2) of two (2) PD MR reviewed: MR#10 and MR#11.. Findings include: The following policies were reviewed on July 30, 2024 at 8:15 AM - 8:20 AM: Facility Policy 1-03-08 Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing Assessment reads in part, “Patient identity, prescription and machine settings are verified by teammate prior to initiation of treatment with the exception of blood flow rate which is verified and documented when the ordered rate is obtained after onset of treatment...The prescription components are confirmed by a licensed nurse within one (1) hour of treatment initiation. Prescription components include but are not necessarily limited to:.....Blood flow rate (BFR). If the dialysis prescription is not being met the reason will be documented and the licensed nurse informed...Abnormal findings or findings outside of any patient specific physician ordered parameters will be reported to the licensed nurse immediately. The licensed nurse will use his/her clinical judgment based on individual patient needs to determine if any clinical interventions are necessary...Abnormal findings Fluid Status: Blood pressure (BP) intradialytic: systolic greater than 180 mm/Hg or less than 90 mm/Hg; diastolic greater than or equal to 100 mm/Hg or less than 50 mm/Hg; Post treatment: systolic BP greater than 140 mm/Hg or less than 90 mm/HG; diastolic BP greater than 90 mm/Hg or less than 50 mm/Hg; ....The licensed nurse will assess the patient prior to discharge. “ Facility Policy 5-01-29 Daily Home Treatment Record (Flowsheet) states in part, “As clinically applicable, all treatment data outlined on the Daily Home Treatment Record must be collected. Completed Daily Home Treatment Records must be reviewed to assist in evaluating the patient’s progress and self-care decision-making process. This post-treatment data review will be verified by the Peritoneal Dialysis registered nurse documenting review in the medical record per guidance below: a) the licensed nurse will review the patient’s data via submitted Daily Home Treatment Records....d) the licensed nurse is responsible for end of month review for all Daily Home Treatment Records.” The policy also contains a section on Abnormal Findings which reads in part, “...the following are considered abnormal findings and should be reported to the licensed nurse and documented in the patient’s medical record....Fluid Status: if patient is above or below 2 kg from the target weight and if patient is using 4.25% (red) dialysate; Blood Pressure: Systolic greater than 150mm/Hg or less than 90mm/Hg, Diastolic greater than or equal to 100mm Hg; Temperature Pre/Post/PRN: Greater than 100 degrees Fahrenheit or 2 degree rise over baseline;” and “All Daily Home Treatment Records will be reviewed, attested to, and maintained as part of the patient’s medical record.” A review of MRs was conducted on July 30, 2024 starting at 12:00 PM and again on July 31, 2024 starting at 8:00 AM. The admission date (AD) is indicated below. MR#6 AD 08/29/2016. HD Treatment Records reviewed from 07/15/2024 to 07/26/2024 found the following: 07/15/2024: HD Treatment was initiated by the patient care technician (PCT) at 11:00 AM. Blood pressure (BP) was 209/103 at the start of treatment. 07/17/2024: HD Treatment was initiated by the PCT at 11:00 AM. BP was 212/99 at the start of treatment. Subsequent BP recordings were: 246/93 (11:30 AM), 200/114 (12:00 PM), 157/51 (12:30 PM), 236/71 (1:01 PM), 205/90 (1:30 PM), 265/85 (2:01 PM), 160/67 (3:00 PM), and 158/66 (3:05 PM). 07/18/2024: HD Treatment was initiated by the PCT at 11:22 AM. BP was 217/111 at the start of treatment. There was no evidence that the licensed nurse was notified about the elevated blood pressures during the 7/15, 7/17, or 7/18 HD treatments. There was no documentation on either the treatment details reports or in the electronic medical record by the licensed nurse regarding the elevated blood pressures, no evidence that the physician was notified of the consistently high BP’s on 7/17, nor were any other interventions implemented to address the elevated pressures on 7/17. MR#7 AD 04/19/2024. HD Treatment Records reviewed from 07/15/2024 to 07/26/2024 found that there were no post treatment nursing assessments documented on the treatment details reports for 7/15, 7/18, 7/19, 7/22, and 7/24. MR#9 AD 06/21/2019. HD Treatment Records reviewed from 07/15/2024 to 07/26/2024 found that there were no post treatment nursing assessments documented on the treatment details reports for 7/22, 7/24, and 7/26. MR#10 AD 08/07/2023. The patient was using Homechoice Claria Automated Peritoneal Dialysis system with Sharesource. Sharesource is a remote patient management system that allows healthcare providers to securely view their patient’s recently completed home dialysis-related treatment data which is automatically collected after each peritoneal dialysis (PD) session. Healthcare providers can then act on this information by remotely adjusting their patients’ home therapy prescription without requiring the patient to travel to the facility. The PD prescription dated 06/21/2024 contained orders for a target weight of 94.0 kg. The Sharesource PD Treatment Records provided by the facility and reviewed for the time frame of 06/18/2024 to 07/22/2024 contained no recordings of pre or post patient weights, pre or post blood pressures, or patient temperatures. MR#11 AD 12/18/2020. A review of the daily home treatment PD records documented by the patient, reviewed for the time frame of 05/16/2024 to 07/24/2024, contained no column to capture patient temperature and therefore, there was no evidence to support that the patient’s temperature was monitored. An interview conducted with the administrator and regional home program manager on August 1, 2024 starting at 10:15 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 898 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45377 Based on a review of medical records (MR), hemodialysis (HD) treatment records, facility policies, and an interview with the administrator, the agency failed to follow hemodialysis (HD) treatment physician orders for two (2) of eleven (11) records reviewed: MR#7 and MR#9. Findings include: The following policies were reviewed on July 30, 2024 at 8:20 AM: Facility Policy 1-03-08 Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing Assessment reads in part, “Patient identity, prescription and machine settings are verified by teammate prior to initiation of treatment with the exception of blood flow rate which is verified and documented when the ordered rate is obtained after onset of treatment...The prescription components are confirmed by a licensed nurse within one (1) hour of treatment initiation. Prescription components include but are not necessarily limited to:.....Blood flow rate (BFR).... If the dialysis prescription is not being met the reason will be documented and the licensed nurse informed...” Facility Policy 1-01-09 Prescribed Treatment Time Not Met states in part, “The registered nurse (RN) will verify that a patient signs the Early Termination of Treatment Against Medical Advice Form any time the patient requests to terminate their treatment earlier than the prescribed run time. The RN will obtain the patient’s signature on the Early Termination of Treatment Against Medical Advice form prior to the patient being rinsed back from their treatment. If unable to obtain the patient’s signature prior to rinse-back, the RN will obtain the patient’s signature on the form prior to the patient’s departure from the facility. A RN must countersign all Early Termination of Treatment Against Medical Advice Forms. A witness signature is required only if the patient refuses to sign the form. If shortened/early termination of treatment exceeds 30 or more minutes, the RN will notify the patient’s attending nephrologist to discuss the appropriate intervention (if any), including what additional medical orders may be necessary to address the patient’s specific needs. Shortened/Early Termination of the dialysis treatment includes all reasons the prescribed dialysis time is not met by 30 or more minutes. This includes but is not limited to: the late initiation of treatment with termination at scheduled time, early termination at the end of treatment and interruptions of dialysis during treatment, i.e., machine or access problems or use of the bathroom by the patient. Reasons why a patient’s treatment may be terminated early include, but are not limited to:.....patient choice. If a patient’s treatment is shortened/early terminated, the RN will document the event in the patient’s electronic health record.... A completed copy of the Early Termination of Treatment Against Medical Advice form will be kept in the patient’s health record.” A review of MR was conducted on July 30, 2024 starting at 12:00 PM and again on July 31, 2024 starting at 8:00 AM. The admission date (AD) is indicated below. MR#7 AD 04/19/2024. HD Treatment Orders started on 06/28/2024 included a blood flow rate (BFR) order of 350 mL/Min, and a HD treatment duration of four (4) hours). HD Treatment Records reviewed from 07/15/2024 to 07/26/2024 found the following: 7/18: HD Treatment was shortened and terminated after 3 hours and 19 minutes. Treatment was started at 6:37 AM and terminated at 9:56 AM. 7/19: BFR was 300mL/min for the entire treatment. BFR was started at 200 mL/Min at 3:53PM, then increased to 300 mL/Min at 4:02 PM where it remained until 7:02 PM. Treatment was shortened and terminated at 7:08 PM after 3 hours, 18 minutes 7/22: BFR was 300mL/min for the entire treatment. BFR was started at 300 mL/Min at 12:04 PM where it remained until 3:31 PM. HD Treatment was shortened and terminated at 3:15 PM after 3 hours, 11 minues. 7/24: BFR was 300mL/min for the entire treatment. BFR was started at 200 mL/Min at 11:22 PM, then increased to 300 mL/Min at 11:30 PM where it remained until the treatment end time at 15:10 PM. 7/26: BFR was 300mL/Min for the entire treatment. BFR was started at 300 mL/Min at 11:25 PM, where it remained until 2:01 PM at which time the BFR was increased to 350 mL/Min. Treatment was shortened and terminated at 2:43 PM after 3 hours, 18 minutes. There were no notes addressing the reason for the discrepancy in BFR when compared to the physician treatment orders indicating that the BFR should be 350mL/min, nor were there any new physician orders changing the BFR for any of the above treatments. There were no early termination of treatment against medical advice forms contained in the medical record for the shortened treatments on 7/18, 7/19, 7/22 or 7/26. MR#9 AD 06/21/2019. HD Treatment Orders started on 07/03/2024 included a HD treatment duration of four (4) hours. HD Treatment Records reviewed from 07/15/2024 to 07/26/2024 found that the HD treatment on 7/26 was terminated after 3 hours, 5 minutes. There was no early termination of treatment against medical advice form contained in the medical record for the shortened treatment. An interview conducted with the administrator and regional home program manager on August 1, 2024 starting at 10:15 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 1,019 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45377 Based on a review of personnel files (PF), observations on the clinical unit, facility policies, and an interview with the administrator, the facility failed to provide evidence of following its policies related to hemodialysis (HD) access visibility for five (5) of twelve (12) observations at the following stations (STN): STN #15, STN#19, STN#5, STN#17, and STN#13, and cleansing of the HD access site for one (1) of two (2) observations: STN #23, and failed to provide evidence of following its policy related to tuberculosis (TB) screening for one (1) of three (3) PF’s reviewed: PF#2. Findings include: The following policies were reviewed on July 30, 2024 at 8:15 AM to 8:20 AM: Policy 1-03-08 Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing Assessment reads in part, “The vascular access site, blood line connections and the patient’s face should be visible throughout the dialysis treatment.” Policy 1-04-01 Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) and Arteriovenous Graft (AVG) Vascular Access Care states in part, “Patient are encouraged to wash access extremity with soap and water upon arrival for dialysis, if able. If patient unable to wash site, patient care teammate will clean access extremity with skin cleansing agency and pat dry.” Policy 1-04-01E AV Fistula or Graft Cannulation with Nipro or Medisystems Safety Fistula Needles (SFN) and Administration of Heparin Loading Dose reads in part, “Procedure: Have patient wash access site with appropriate antibacterial soap, if able. If patient unable to wash access site, patient care teammate will clean access extremity with skin cleansing agent and pat dry. Rationale: Verifies that access extremity has been cleaned.” Observations on the dialysis treatment area took place on Monday, July 29, 2024 starting at 9:15 AM, and again on Tuesday, July 30, 2024 starting at 11:00 AM. The facility provided a patient seating chart/schedule for Monday-Wednesday-Friday (3 shifts), and Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday (2 shifts). The following situations were observed: The patient located at Station #15 (MR#23) was observed on 07/29 at 10:05 AM to have a blanket covering the access site such that the access site was not able to be visualized. The patient located at Station #19 (MR#4) was observed on 07/30 at 12:10 PM to have a blanket covering the access site such that the access site was not able to be visualized. The patient located at Station #5 (MR#16) was observed on 07/30 at 12:20 PM to have a blanket covering the access site such that the access site was not able to be visualized. The patient located at Station #17 (MR#24) was observed on 07/30 at 12:25 PM to have a gown covering the access site such that the access site was not able to be visualized. It appeared that the patient had put on a white gown backwards causing the patient’s arms to be covered. The patient located at Station #13 (MR#25) was observed on 07/30 at 12:30 PM to have a blanket covering the access site such that the access site was not able to be visualized. Of note, the schedule that was received on 7/29 did not have a patient seated at that location. The surveyor asked the FA which patient had been moved to station #13. It was determined to be MR#25. MR#19 was observed to enter the HD unit at approximately 10:31 AM on 07/29. Upon entry, the patient weighed him/herself, then walked to STN #23 without washing his/her access site at the sink located at the entrance. PF#2 proceeded to apply antiseptic to the skin over the cannulation sites in preparation for cannulation without washing the skin over the access site first. PF#2 did not ask the patient if s/he had washed the skin over the access site when the patient entered the treatment area. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National TB Controllers Association released updated recommendations for Tuberculosis (TB) screening, testing, and treatment of health care personnel on May 17, 2019. These recommendations update the health care personnel screening and testing section of the 2005 CDC Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings. All health care personnel should be screened for TB upon hire (i.e., preplacement). TB screening is a process that includes: a baseline individual TB risk assessment, a TB symptom evaluation, and a TB test (e.g., a TB single blood assay test or a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST), and additional evaluation for TB disease as needed. Health care personnel with a positive TB test result should receive a symptom evaluation and a chest x-ray to rule out TB disease. Additional workup may be needed based on those results. All health care personnel should receive TB education annually. TB education should include information on TB risk factors, the signs and symptoms of TB disease, and TB infection control policies and procedures. (CDC/MMWR/May 17, 2019/Vol.68/No.19). The following facility policy was reviewed on July 31, 2024 at 8:00 AM: Policy 4-06-05 Tuberculosis Monitoring and Follow-Up reads in part, “If exemption criteria for TST is not met, the following testing options are available: Baseline TST using a two step Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) Mantoux test (a second TST repeated one to three weeks after the first, if the initial test is negative. A second TST is not needed if the teammate can show documented TST results from any time during the previous 3 months; a single TST will be administered and represents the second stage of two-step testing.” A review of PF’s was conducted on July 31, 2024 starting at approximately 12:20 PM. The date of hire (DOH) is indicated below. PF#2 DOH 11/13/2023 did not contain any evidence of completion of a two-step TST or a QuantiFERON blood study upon hire. An interview with the administrator and regional home program manager on August 1, 2024 starting at 10:15 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 1, 2024Standard inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 13, 2012.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 24 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (46 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 66% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 47 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Philadelphia County, 42 have a star rating from CMS: 3 rated 5 of 5, 14 rated 4 of 5, 18 rated 3 of 5, 5 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.