Davita University City Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
3020 Market Street, Suite 100, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104. (215) 382-2439.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 25 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Dec 14, 2023: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Dec 14, 2023: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 309 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46632 Based on observation of the clinical area, facility policy and an interview with the facility administrator and clinical services manager, the facility did not ensure infection control procedure regarding glove removal and handwashing for two (2) of ten (10) observations (OBS). (OBS# 1 and 2). Findings include: A review of policy 1-05-01 “Infection Control For Dialysis Facilities” on December 11, 2023 at 1:30 PM states: “ 1. All teammates...will perform hand hygiene b. prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves. c. after contamination with blood or other infectious material. d. after patient and dialysis delivery system contact,,,7a Gloves should be changed when: ii. When going from a “dirty” area or task to a “clean” area or task. iii. When moving from i. contaminated body site to a clean body site of the same patient; and iv. After touching one patient or their dialysis delivery system and before arriving to care for another patient or touch another patient’s dialysis delivery system. Observation of the clinical area was conducted on 12/11/23 between 9:04 am-12:19 pm. OBS # 1 Machine 10 PCT 1, after locating and palpating cannulation site, did not discard gloves, perform hand hygiene and don new gloves prior to prior to inserting the fistula needle into the patient’s vascular access. OBS # 2 Machine 16 PCT 2 , after locating and palpating cannulation site did not discard gloves, perform hand hygiene and don new gloves prior to inserting the fistula needle into the patient’s vascular access. An interview with the facility administrator conducted on December 11, 2023 at 1:00 pm confirmed the above findings.”
-
Assess B/P & Fluid Management Needs
The inspectors’ words, 1,129 words
“PA-ASSESS B/P, FLUID MANAGEMENT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Blood pressure, and fluid management needs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46632 Based on a review of medical records (MR), facility policy, and an interview with the facility administrator, the facility did not follow its policy for heart rate management for two (2) of fifteen (15) MRs. (MR # 14 and 15). Findings include: A review of facility policy 1-03-08 “-Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing Assessment” conducted on December 13, 2023 at 1:25 PM states: “Intradialytic Data Collection/Assessment 11. Abnormal findings...will be reported to the licensed nurse immediately. Abnormal Findings: Heart or pulse rate -Intradialytic- Less than 60 beats per minute or greater than 100 beats per minute ...........” Findings include: MR # 14 admission date 12/19/2022. A review of treatment sheet for 11/28/2023 revealed the following: Pre Pulse sitting 81 18:31 Pulse 101 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 19:01 Pulse 103 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 19:31 Pulse 102 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 20:02 Pulse 102 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 20:32 Pulse 106 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 21:01 Pulse 104 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 21:31 Pulse 100 “Patient monitored: eyes closed patient resting” 22:01 Pulse 104 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 22:34 Pulse 103 “Patient face; vascular access and blood line connection visible” 23:01 Pulse 105 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 23:31 Pulse 108 “Patient awake, alert and states no complaints at this time.” 00:01 Pulse 90 “Patient face; vascular access and blood line connection visible” 00:21 Pulse 108 “Treatment terminated”. Post heart rate 107 The PCT (patient care technician) did not report the above elevated heart rate to the licensed nurse and therefore the licensed nurse did not assess the heart rate during the treatment. A review of treatment sheet for 12/03/2023 revealed the following: Pre Pulse sitting 98 18:29 Pulse 104 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 19:00 Pulse 103 “”Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 19:29 Pulse 84 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 19:59 Pulse 83 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 20:29 Pulse 104 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 21:00 Pulse 105 “Patient face; vascular access and blood line connection visible” 21:29 Pulse 102 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 22:00 Pulse 102 “Patient monitored: eyes closed patient resting” 22:30 Pulse 98 “”Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 22:59 Pulse 108 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 23:29 Pulse 105 “”Patient monitored: eyes closed patient resting” 23:59 Pulse 109 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 00:03 Pulse 107 “Treatment terminated”. Post heart rate 102 The PCT (patient care technician) did not report the above elevated heart rate to the licensed nurse and therefore the licensed nurse did not assess the heart rate during the treatment. A review of treatment sheet for 12/05/2023 revealed the following: Pre Pulse sitting 103 18:06 Pulse 102 “Treatment started without complications. Normal saline prime given: Heparin pump is on and working” 18:29 Pulse 100 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 18:59 Pulse 100 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 19:29 Pulse 101 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 19:59 Pulse 103 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 20:31 Pulse 103 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 20:59 Pulse 102 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 21:30 Pulse 107 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 21:59 Pulse 100 “Patient monitored: eyes closed patient resting” 22:30 Pulse 102 “”Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 22:59 Pulse 100 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 23:30 Pulse 108 “Patient face; vascular access and blood line connection visible” 23:59 Pulse 109 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 00:08 Pulse 110 “Treatment terminated”. Post heart rate 98 The PCT (patient care technician) did not report the above elevated heart rate to the licensed nurse and therefore the licensed nurse did not assess the heart rate during the treatment. MR # 15 admission date 12/03/2019. A review of treatment sheet for 11/27/2023 revealed the following: Pre Pulse sitting 103 8:31 am Pulse 113 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 9:01 am Pulse 127 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 9:31 am Pulse 111 “Patient face, vascular access; and blood line connection visible” 10:01 am Pulse 98 “Patient states no complaints at this time” 10:31 am Pulse 102 Patient states no complaints at this time” 11:01 am Pulse 102 “Patient stable” 11:31 am Pulse 94 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 11:51 am Pulse 101 “Treatment terminated Patient blood returned without complications” Post heart rate 93 The PCT (patient care technician) did not report the above elevated heart rate to the licensed nurse and therefore the licensed nurse did not assess the heart rate during the treatment. A review of treatment sheet for 11/29/2023 revealed the following: Pre Pulse sitting 120 7:16 am Pulse 107 “Treatment started without complication. Normal saline prime given, Patient face, vascular access; and blood line connection visible” 7:17 am Pulse 111 “Patient verbalized no complaints” 7:32 am Pulse 132 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 8:02 am Pulse 132 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 8:32 am Pulse 128 “Patient stable” 9:02 am Pulse 125 “Patient monitored: watching TV no complications” 9:32 am Pulse 120 “Patient appears to be tolerating treatment well at this time” 10:02 am Pulse 114 “Patient awake, alert and states no complaints at this time” 10:17 am Pulse 128 “Treatment terminated Patient blood returned without complications” Post heart rate 103 The PCT (patient care technician) did not report the above elevated heart rate to the licensed nurse and therefore the licensed nurse did not assess the heart rate during the treatment. A review of treatment sheet for 12/01/2023 revealed the following: Pre Pulse heart rate 103 9:32 am Pulse 116 “Patient awake, alert and states no complaints at this time” 10:02 am Pulse 104 “Patient awake, alert and states no complaints at this time” 10:23 am Pulse 122 “Treatment terminated” Post heart rate 120 The PCT (patient care technician) did not report the above elevated heart rate to the licensed nurse and therefore the licensed nurse did not assess the heart rate during the treatment. An interview with the facility administrator conducted on December 13, 2023 at 1:32 pm confirmed the above findings.”
-
Vascular Access - Monitor/Referrals
The inspectors’ words, 258 words
“POC-VASCULAR ACCESS-MONITOR/REFERRALS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(5) The interdisciplinary team must provide vascular access monitoring and appropriate, timely referrals to achieve and sustain vascular access. The hemodialysis patient must be evaluated for the appropriate vascular access type, taking into consideration co-morbid conditions, other risk factors, and whether the patient is a potential candidate for arteriovenous fistula placement. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46632 Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and an interview with the facility administrator, the facility failed to utilizes the vascular access clamp procedure was seen by staff member throughout the dialysis treatment for one (1) of ten (10) treatment floor observations OBS (OBS # 1). Findings include: A review was conducted of facility policy/procedure on December 11, 2023 approximately 12:39 pm. In center hemodialysis policy and procedure 1-04-08A #2 following termination of treatment and removal of fistula needle............... 8 clamp may remain in place for five-10 minutes before checking to see if bleeding has stopped 12. clamp may remain in place for an additional 5 to 10 minutes before checking to see if bleeding has stopped. Access clamp should not be left on longer than 20 minutes. Observations conducted in patient treatment area on 12/11/23 between 9:04 am-12:19 pm revealed the following: OBS # 1 Machine 7 PCT 1, During treatment floor observations the patients access site was clamped between 9:40 am to 10:04 am before clamp was taken off ( approximately 24 minutes) An interview with the facility Facility Administrator on December 11, 2023 at approximately 1:00 pm. confirmed the above findings.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2023 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 5, 2011.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 25 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, better than expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, better than expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 47 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Philadelphia County, 42 have a star rating from CMS: 3 rated 5 of 5, 14 rated 4 of 5, 18 rated 3 of 5, 5 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.