Clarion Dialysis Center
A dialysis facility in Clarion, Pennsylvania 16214
22631 Rt 68, Suite 450, Clarion, Pennsylvania 16214. (814) 223-4655.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 13 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 24, 2025: a standard inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 24, 2025: standard inspection4 deficiencies
-
Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds
The inspectors’ words, 205 words
“IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44820 Based on a review of facility policy/procedure, treatment area observations, and an interview with the facility administrator and clinic manager, the facility failed to ensure expired items were discarded one (1) of 0ne (1) observations (OBS). (OBS#1-#8) Findings include: A review was conducted of facility policy on March 18, 2025 at approximately 3:30 p.m. Policy/Procedure Name: Medication Administration... Policy Number: IC61... Purpose:... To administerr and store medications in a safe manner according to manufacturer’s recommendations... 21. Expired Medications will be disposed of according to state and local laws...” Observations conducted in the patient treatment area on March 18, 2025 between approximately 9:30 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. revealed the following: OBS#1: On March 18, 2025 at approximately 9:30 a.m. the following expired items were observed in the treatment area medication supply: Eight (8) Diphenhydramine HCL injection 50mg/ml (1 ml vial) expired 2/2024; LOT#’s 022016. An interview with the clinic manager and facility Administrator on March 18, 2025 at approximately 4:00 p.m. confirmed the above findings.”
-
Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care
The inspectors’ words, 500 words
“IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44820 Based upon a review of review of manufacturer’s direction for use, treatment area observations (OBS), and an interview with the Charge Nurse, Nurse Manager, Staff Nurse and Facility Administrator, facility failed to ensure staff followed and maintained aseptic technique for the care of vascular accesses, including intravascular catheters, for two (2) of two (2) observations (OBS #1 and OBS #2). Findings include: On 3/19/25 at approximately 1:15 p.m. a review of Manufacturer’s direction for use - Chloraprep One-Step (2% Chlorahexidine gluconate/ 70% Isopropyl alcohol) antiseptic swab states”...dry surgical sites (e.g., abdomen or arm): use gentle repeated back-and-forth strokes for 30 seconds...” Observations conducted in patient treatment area on 3/19/25 between approximately 9:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. revealed the following: OBS #1: During observation of Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Exit Site Care performed on 3/19/25 at approximately 9:50 a.m., station #5, Employee (EMP) #7 cleansed area around the CVC exit site, starting from the insertion site and moving outward in a spiral circular motion with a Chloraprep One-Step (Chlorahexidine swabstick) antiseptic swab. Interview with EMP#7 states “we were trained to use the circular technique starting at insertion site and working outward in larger circles to clean the area.” OBS #2: During observation of CVC Exit Site Care performed on 3/19/25 at approximately 10:40 a.m., station #10, EMP #4 cleansed area around the CVC exit site, starting from the insertion site and moving outward in a spiral circular motion with a Chloraprep One-Step (Chlorahexidine swabstick) antiseptic swab. Interview with EMP#4 states “To clean the catheter site we use a spiral technique with the swab.” 3/19/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m. an interview with Charge Nurse revealed “We used to do a back and forth motion but when new management came in they made us change it.” 3/20/25 at approximately 2:30 p.m. an interview with Nurse Manager and Facility Administrator confirmed the above findings. Facility Administrator states “The procedure is a circular motion from inside, closest entry point, to outside away from the catheter making a spiral and we followed the KDQOL website guidance. I see that the manufacturer directions state otherwise. The information is contradicting in the guidance.””
-
Achieve Adequate Clearance
The inspectors’ words, 1,003 words
“POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44820 Based on a review of facility policies, review of job descriptions, review of Medical records (MRs) and an interview with clinic manager, the facility failed to ensure treatments were delivered in accordance with the dialysis prescriptions ordered by the physician and failed to follow policy and procedure for three (3) of four (4) MRs reviewed (MR#2, MR#3 and MR#4). Findings included: Review of facility policy on 3/20/25 at approximately 9:00 AM revealed: “Policy/Procedure Name: Safety Checks ... Policy Number: IC10 ... Purpose ... to ensure the treatment is progressing properly and safely ... Policy ... 5. Patient Monitoring during treatment ... Verify the prescribed blood flow is obtained ... 6. Correct any issues found and notify Charge RN ... “ Review of job description on 3/20/25 at approximately 3:00 PM revealed: “ Medical Director Job Description ... General Responsibilities: The Medical Director is directly responsible for the delivery of patient care and outcomes in the facility ... 2. Ensures that all procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and non-physician providers ... 14. Assures adequate monitoring of the patient and the dialysis process which includes, but not limited to staffing ratios, assessments of patients, reporting of changes in the patient ’ s condition and documentation ... “ Review of MRs conducted on March 20, 2025, at approximately 1:00pm and March 24, 2025, at approximately 12:30 pm revealed the following: MR#2, admitted on 11/25/24. Treatment flowsheets dates reviewed 2/21/25 through 3/14/25 revealed the following: Treatment date: 3/5/25 - Blood Flow Rate (BFR) 450ml/min prescribed by physician; treatment initiated at 10:52 AM - BFR 185ml/min documented: 11:32 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented. 12:01 PM - BFR 300ml/min documented 12:31 PM - BFR 325ml/min documented 13:01 PM - BFR 350ml/min documented 13:31 PM - BFR 350ml/min documented 14:01 PM - BFR 350ml/min documented 14:13 PM - BFR 350ml/min documented 14:13 PM - treatment terminated. Treatment sheet contained no evidence of Charge RN notification for inability to achieve/administer prescribed dialysis orders. No documentation of physician notification regarding dialysis prescription not being achieved or administered as prescribed. MR#3, admitted on 9/25/24, treatment flowsheets dates reviewed 2/17/25 through 3/17/25 revealed the following: Treatment date: 3/7/25 - Blood Flow Rate (BFR) 500ml/min prescribed by physician; treatment initiated at 5:59 AM - BFR 450ml/min documented: 6:01 AM - BFR 450ml/min documented. 6:31 AM - BFR 450ml/min documented 7:01 AM - BFR 450ml/min documented 7:31 AM through 9:15 AM - BFR 500ml/min documented 9:15 AM - treatment terminated. Treatment sheet contained no evidence of Charge RN notification for inability to achieve/administer prescribed dialysis orders. No documentation of physician notification regarding dialysis prescription not being achieved or administered as prescribed. MR#4, admitted on 3/4/24: treatment flowsheets dates reviewed 2/26/25 through 3/12/25 revealed the following: Treatment date: 2/26/25 - Blood Flow Rate (BFR) 350ml/min prescribed by physician; treatment initiated at 6:32 AM - BFR 200ml/min documented: 6:32 AM through 9:40 AM - BFR 200ml/min documented. 9:40 AM - treatment terminated. Treatment sheet contained no evidence of Charge RN notification for inability to achieve/administer prescribed dialysis orders. No documentation of physician notification regarding dialysis prescription not being achieved or administered as prescribed. Treatment date: 2/28/25 - Blood Flow Rate (BFR) 350ml/min prescribed by physician; treatment initiated at 6:48 AM - BFR 250ml/min documented: 7:00 AM - BFR 250ml/min documented. 7:30 PM - BFR 250ml/min documented 8:01 AM - BFR 350ml/min documented 8:30 AM - BFR 200ml/min documented 9:00 AM - BFR 200ml/min documented 9:30 AM - BFR 200ml/min documented 9:54 AM - treatment terminated. Treatment sheet contained no evidence of Charge RN notification for inability to achieve/administer prescribed dialysis orders. No documentation of physician notification regarding dialysis prescription not being achieved or administered as prescribed. Treatment date: 3/3/25 - Blood Flow Rate (BFR) 350ml/min prescribed by physician; treatment initiated at 6:52 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented: 7:01 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented. 7:30 PM - BFR 300ml/min documented 8:33 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented 8:42 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented 9:34 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented 9:54 AM - treatment terminated. Treatment sheet contained no evidence of Charge RN notification for inability to achieve/administer prescribed dialysis orders. No documentation of physician notification regarding dialysis prescription not being achieved or administered as prescribed. Treatment date: 3/7/25 - Blood Flow Rate (BFR) 350ml/min prescribed by physician; treatment initiated at 6:38 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented: 6:38 AM through 9:40 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented. 9:40 AM - treatment terminated. Treatment sheet contained no evidence of Charge RN notification for inability to achieve/administer prescribed dialysis orders. No documentation of physician notification regarding dialysis prescription not being achieved or administered as prescribed. Treatment date: 3/10/25 - Blood Flow Rate (BFR) 350ml/min prescribed by physician; treatment initiated at 11:00 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented: 11:30 - BFR 200ml/min documented 11:45AM - treatment terminated. Treatment sheet contained no evidence of Charge RN notification for inability to achieve/administer prescribed dialysis orders. No documentation of physician notification regarding dialysis prescription not being achieved or administered as prescribed. Treatment date: 3/12/25 - Blood Flow Rate (BFR) 350ml/min prescribed by physician; treatment initiated at 6:30 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented: 7:00 AM - BFR 300ml/min documented. 7:30 PM - BFR 300ml/min documented 8:00 AM - BFR 250ml/min documented 8:30 AM - BFR 250ml/min documented 9:00 AM - BFR 200ml/min documented 9:30 AM - treatment terminated. Treatment sheet contained no evidence of Charge RN notification for inability to achieve/administer prescribed dialysis orders. No documentation of physician notification regarding dialysis prescription not being achieved or administered as prescribed. An interview with the clinical manager on 3/25/25 at approximately 8:30 AM confirmed the above findings.”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 355 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44820 Based on a review of facility policies/procedure, medical records (MR), and employee interviews, the facility failed to follow its’ policy for managing treatment adherence for two (2) of four (4) MR’s reviewed. (MR#1 and MR#2) Findings included: Review of agency Policy on March 19, 2025, at approximately 1:00 pm revealed: “Policy/Procedure name: Hypotension... Policy Number: IC34... Effective date: 3-01-2024... Purpose: To prevent a hypotensive episode for patient and avoid injury, potential access clotting, etc... Policy: 1. Monitor BP pre, during and post treatment... Procedure: ... 4. If systolic BP has dropped 20 points from previous reading, notify RN...” A review of medical records took place March 20, 2025 at approximately 1:00pm and March 24, 2025 at approximately 12:30 pm revealed the following: MR #1, Start of Care (SOC) date: 1/15/24 - Dates reviewed: 2/19/25 to 3/17/25. Documentation revealed: Treatment Date (TD) 2/19/25 - 10:30 a.m. Blood Pressure (BP) 126/62; 11:00 a.m. BP 102/56 -systolic BP decreased 24 points - no documentation of RN notified. TD 2/28/25 - 7:34 a.m. BP 187/90; 8:00 a.m. BP 166/83 - Systolic BP decreased 21 points - no documentation of RN notified. TD 3/17/25 - 7:31 a.m. BP 158/77; 8:01 a.m. BP 115/54 - systolic BP decreased 43 points - no documentation of RN notified. MR #2, SOC date: 11/25/24 - Dates reviewed: 2/21/25 to 3/14/25. Documentation revealed: Treatment Date (TD) 2/19/25 - 10:30 a.m. Blood Pressure (BP) 126/62; 11:00 a.m. BP 102/56 - sytolic BP decreased 24 points - no documentation of RN notified. TD 2/28/25 - 12:00 p.m. BP 123/64; 12:30 p.m. BP 98/55 - systolic BP decreased 25 points - no documentation of RN notified. An interview with the clinic manager and Vice President of Clinical and Regulatory on March 20, 2025, at approximately 3:30 p.m. confirmed the above findings.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2025 | Standard inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 13, 2004.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 13 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Clarion County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.