Dci North Versailles
A dialysis facility in North Versailles, Pennsylvania 15137
613 East Pittsburgh Mckeesport Boulevard, North Versailles, Pennsylvania 15137. (412) 675-0960.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 19 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 3, 2024: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 3, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Receive Services Outlined In Poc
The inspectors’ words, 213 words
“PR-RECEIVE SERVICES OUTLINED IN POC CFR(s): 494.70(a)(12) The patient has the right to- (12) Receive the necessary services outlined in the patient plan of care described in §494.90; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46886 Based on interviews with staff (EMP), medical record reviews (MR), and patient care observations (OBS) the facility failed to provide medications as described in the plan of care for one (1) of five (5) prescription verification observations. (OBS4) Findings included: During a dialysis prescription verification observation (OBS4) for MR5 conducted on 5/1/24 at approximately 11:45 am with EMP1 (Clinical Manager) it was noted that 1000 units/hour of heparin were to be infusing as listed on the dialysis prescription but the patient did not have a heparin infusion running. A review of MR5 ’ s 5/1/24 Hemodialysis Flowsheet on 5/1/24 at approximately 3:00 pm revealed a treatment plan which included an hourly infusion of 1000 units of heparin (blood thinner) during dialysis. The patient ’ s treatment start time was listed as 10:25 am. As of OBS4 at 11:45 am the patient failed to receive approximately 1000 units of hourly heparin as per the treatment plan. The above finding was reviewed with EMP1 (Clinical Manager) and EMP2 (Administrator) during an interview on 5/1/24 at approximately 3:00 pm.”
-
Continuously Monitor/Take Action/Track/Sustain Improve
The inspectors’ words, 296 words
“QAPI-MONITOR/ACT/TRACK/SUSTAIN IMPROVE CFR(s): 494.110(b) The dialysis facility must continuously monitor its performance, take actions that result in performance improvements, and track performance to ensure that improvements are sustained over time. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46886 Based on a review of the facility quality assessment and improvement program meeting minutes (QA), discharge summary checklists, and an interview with the clinical manager, the facility did not review and evaluate the root causes of patient mortality, then develop an improvement plan for two (2) of four (4) QAs reviewed. (QAs 1 and 2) Findings include: A 5/3/24 review of agency policy titled Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) revealed: “ Policy ...The dialysis facility must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators ...The following list represents the minimum elements required by CMS and DCI to be reported/tracked ...Deaths ...” A review of the QAPI program meeting minutes from October 2023 to December 2023 (QAs) was conducted on 5/3/24 at approximately 1:00 pm with EMP1, Clinical Manager. Two patient deaths were noted within the period reviewed. QA1: Meeting minutes dated 11/16/23 read: “ ...Hospitalizations/Mortality rate ...Mortality rate ...1 CTB this month. One patient death was reported in the meeting minutes but no evidence of a patient mortality root cause analysis. QA2: Meeting Minutes dated 12/21/23 which reviewed November data read: “ ...Hospitalizations/Mortality Rates ...Mortality rate ...1 CTB this month. EMP1 presented surveyor with Discharge Summary Checklist noting a patient death with a discharge date of 11/7/23. One patient death was reported in the meeting minutes but no evidence of a patient mortality root cause analysis was noted review within meeting minutes. Lack of evidence to support that QAPI program reviewed patient mortality root cause was reviewed with the clinical manager, EMP1, on 5/3/24 at approximately 1:00 pm.”
-
Md Resp - Develop, Review& Approve P&P
The inspectors’ words, 387 words
“MD RESP-DEVELOP, REVIEW & APPROVE P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(1) The medical director must- (1) Participate in the development, periodic review and approval of a “patient care policies and procedures manual” for the facility; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46886 Based on interviews with staff (EMP), medical record reviews (MR), reviews of policies and on site observations (OBS), the facility failed to maintain a medication procedure which was up to date with the current standard of practice for one (1) of five (5) MRs reviewed. (MR5) Findings included: A review of CDC recommendations for Injection Safety and Multi-dose Vials on 5/3/24 at approximately 4:30 pm revealed: “Medication vials should always be discarded whenever sterility is compromised or cannot be confirmed. In addition, the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) General Chapter 797 [16 <https://www.cdc.gov/injectionsafety/providers/references.html>] recommends the following for multi-dose vials of sterile pharmaceuticals: If a multi-dose has been opened or accessed (e.g., needle-punctured) the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. Refer to package insert and/or manufacturer expiration date to determine the beyond-use-date. The beyond-use-date refers to the date after which an opened multi-dose vial should not be used ... “ Source: CDC website <https://www.cdc.gov/injectionsafety/providers/provider_faqs_multivials.html> Last Reviewed: June 20, 2019 During a medication preparation observation of injectable heparin (OBS1) for MR5 conducted on 5/1/24 at approximately 11:45 am EMP1 (Clinical Manager) stated that multi-dose medication vials were to be discarded within “ 30 days “ of the date opened. A review of facility policy titled Procedure No: 500 ...Use of Multiple dose Vials on 5/1/24 at approximately 4:00 pm revealed: “ Policy ...2. When a multi-dose vial has been opened ...the vial should be dated, initialed and discarded within 30 days, unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter date for that opened vial ... “ A review of the package insert for Heparin Sodium on 5/3/24 at approximately 10:30 am revealed no specified beyond use date, therefore per CDC guidelines the vial should be discarded 28 days after opening. The current facility procedure of discarding multi-dose heparin sodium at 30 days after opening does not comply with the CDC guidelines for Injection Safety and Multi-dose vials. The finding was reviewed with EMP1 (Clinical Manager) and EMP2 (Administrator) on 5/1/24 at approximately 3:00 pm.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2024 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Mar 26, 2001.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 19 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Dialysis Clinic, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 36 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Allegheny County, 28 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 5 rated 4 of 5, 12 rated 3 of 5, 8 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System | Not given |
| UPMC Presbyterian Renal Unit | Not given |
| UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh | Not given |
| Fkc Western Pennsylvania | 2 |
| Fkc South Hills | 3 |
| Fkc Three Rivers | 1 |
| Dci Pittsburgh Banksville | 3 |
| Davita Jefferson Dialysis | 2 |
| Fkc Clairton | 3 |
| Fkc Ohio Valley | 2 |
| Dci North Hills | 3 |
| Fkc Shadyside | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.