Davita Lewistown Dialysis Center
A dialysis facility in Lewistown, Pennsylvania 17044
611 Electric Avenue, Lewistown, Pennsylvania 17044. (717) 248-2344.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 23 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 20, 2025: a standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 20, 2025: standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 605 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39671 Based on review of facility policy/procedure, observations of hemodialysis (HD) treatment area during patient care and interview with facility administrator (EMP# 1), it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene at the appropriate times during ten (10) of ten (10) treatment floor observations (TFO). (TFO #1, TFO #2, TFO #3, TFO #4 , TFO #5, TFO #6, TFO #7, TFO #8, TFO #9 and TFO #10) Findings Included: Review of ‘INFECTION CONTROL FOR DIALYSIS FACILITIES’ policy/procedure on 8/19/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m. revealed, “HAND HYGIENE: 1. All teammates, Physicians and Non-Physician (NPP) will perform hand hygiene...a. upon entering and exiting the patient treatment area...b. prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves...after patient and dialysis delivery system contact...f. between patients even if the contact is casual...” HD Treatment area observation conducted on 8/1825 between approximately 11:00 a.m. and 2:36 p.m., on 8/19/25 between approximately 11:26 a.m. and 12:44 p.m., and on 8/20/25 at 9:48 a.m. revealed the following: Treatment Floor Observation (TFO) #1: On 8/18/25 at approximately 10:37 a.m. surveyor observed employee# 10 put one glove on, touch dialysis machine at station #19, then walk over and touch the dialysis machine at station #20 and then walk over and touch the dialysis machine #21. Employee failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene between each dialysis station and prior to touching the dialysis machine at each dialysis station. TFO #2: On 8/18/25 at approximately 11:40 a.m. surveyor observed employee #10 removed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to performing additional tasks in the treatment floor. TFO #3: On 8/18/25 at approximately 11:48 a.m. surveyor observed employee #11 removed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to performing additional tasks in the treatment floor. TFO #4: On 8/18/25 at approximately 11:53 a.m. surveyor observed employee #6 put on gloves, removed a sticky note from dialysis machine at station #12, then walk over to remove a sticky note from dialysis machine at station #13 and then walk over to remove a sticky note from dialysis machine at station #14. Employee failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene between each dialysis station and prior to touching the sticky note on the dialysis machines at each dialysis station. TFO #5: On 8/18/25 at approximately 12:06 p.m. surveyor observed employee #2 removed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to performing additional tasks in the treatment floor. TFO #6: On 8/19/25 at approximately 10:48 a.m. surveyor observed employee #6 removed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to performing additional tasks in the treatment floor. TFO #7: On 8/19/25 at approximately 11:03 a.m. surveyor observed employee #16 removed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to performing additional tasks in the treatment floor. TFO #8: On 8/19/25 at approximately 11:05 a.m. surveyor observed employee #16 exit the treatment floor without performing hand hygiene. TFO #9: On 8/19/25 at approximately 11:29 a.m. surveyor observed employee #16 removed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to performing additional tasks in the treatment floor. TFO #10: On 8/19/25 at approximately 11:31 a.m. surveyor observed employee #6 removed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to performing additional tasks in the treatment floor. An interview with the facility administrator on 8/20/22 at approximately 1: 00 p.m. confirmed the above findings and confirmed the above policy as current.”
-
Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds
The inspectors’ words, 606 words
“IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39671 Based on review of facility policy/procedure, observations of hemodialysis (HD) treatment area during patient care and interview with facility administrator (EMP# 1), it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled appropriately for six (6) of six (6) medication observations. (Medication Observation #1, Medication Observation #2, Medication Observation #3, Medication Observation #4, Medication Observation #5 and Medication Observation #6) Findings Included: Review of ‘PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF PARENTERAL MEDICATIONS (NON-ESA-NON-PARSABIV’ policy/procedure on 8/19/25 at approximately 12:00 P.m. revealed, “Procedure:...16. Label the syringe with the patient’s name, name of the prescribed medication, dose, date, time and initials of licensed teammate preparing the dose. Preprinted labels may be used if available...” HD Treatment area observation conducted on 8/1825 between approximately 11:00 a.m. and 2:36 p.m., on 8/19/25 between approximately 11:26 a.m. and 12:44 p.m., and on 8/20/25 at 9:48 a.m. revealed the following: Medication Observation #1: For patient #23 the following drawn up medication syringes were observed on the medication section - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 2,600 units loading dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 2,100 units hourly dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. Medication Observation #2: For patient #24 the following drawn up medication syringes were observed on the medication section - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 2,000 units loading dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 2,200 units hourly dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. Medication Observation #3: For patient #25 the following drawn up medication syringes were observed on the medication section - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 3,000 units loading dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 4,500 units hourly dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. Medication Observation #4: For patient #26 the following drawn up medication syringes were observed on the medication section - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 1,600 units loading dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 2,400 units hourly dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. Medication Observation #5: For patient #27 the following drawn up medication syringes were observed on the medication section - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 2,600 units loading dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. Medication Observation #6: For patient #8 the following drawn up medication syringes were observed on the medication section - One (1) 10 mL (milliliter) syringe with Heparin Pork 2,600 units loading dose- the section on the label ‘time’ was left blank and section ‘initials’ was left blank. An interview with the facility administrator on 8/20/22 at approximately 1: 00 p.m. confirmed the above findings and confirmed the above policy as current.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2025 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jul 31, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 9, 1995.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 23 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (44 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 76% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Mifflin County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.