Hearth Record

Geisinger Health System

A dialysis facility in Danville, Pennsylvania 17822

100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822. (570) 271-6561.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 15, 2025: a standard inspection.

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 15, 2025: standard inspection12 deficiencies
  • Cfc - Quality Assessment & Performance Improvement

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “CFC-QAPI CFR(s): 494.110 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff the facility failed to ensure documentation of an effective QAPI program for seven (7) of seven (7) months of QAPI documentation reviewed. 12/24-6/25 Findings Include: Cross Reference: 494.100 QAPI Scope, Service, Effectiveness 494.110 (a)(1) Tag V 0627 QAPI Ongoing uses indicators = improvements 494.110 (a) (2) (i) Tag V 0629 QAPI Indicator adequacy of dialysis 494.110(a) (2) (ii) Tag V 0630 QAPI Nutritional status 494.110(a) (2) (a)(2)(iii) Tag V 0631 QAPI Mineral metabolism/bone disease 494.110 (a) (2) (iv) Tag V 0632 Anemia 494.110 (a)(2)(v) QAPI Tag V 0633 Vascular access 494.110 (a) (2) (vi) QAPI Tag V 0634 Medical Injuries/errors 494.110 (a)(2)(ix) QAPI Tag V 0637 QAPI infection control trends 494.110 (c) QAPI Tag 0639 Prioritizing Improvement Activities”

    Rule V0625. Condition-level.

  • Covers Scope Of Services/Effective/Idt Involved

    The inspectors’ words, 286 words

    “QAPI-COVERS SCOPE SERV/EFFECTIVE/IDT INVOL CFR(s): 494.110 The dialysis facility must develop, implement, maintain, and evaluate an effective, data-driven, quality assessment and performance improvement program with participation by the professional members of the interdisciplinary team. The program must reflect the complexity of the dialysis facility’s organization and services (including those services provided under arrangement), and must focus on indicators related to improved health outcomes and the prevention and reduction of medical errors. The dialysis facility must maintain and demonstrate evidence of its quality improvement and performance improvement program for review by CMS. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance documentation the facility failed to show evidence of a developed, implemented, maintained, and evaluated quality improvement and performance improvement program for seven (7) of seven (7) months of QAPI documentation. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approxiamtely 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documntation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both an in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. There was no documentation the facility developed, implemented, maintained, and evaluated an effective, data-driven, quality assessment and performance improvement program that reflected the complexity of the dialysis facility’s organization and services (including those services provided under arrangement), and focused on indicators related to improved health outcomes and the prevention and reduction of medical errors. Additionally, the dialysis facility failed to maintain and demonstrate evidence of its quality improvement and performance improvement program . Interview on 8/15/25 from approximately 11:30 AM with the administrator confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0626. Standard-level.

  • Ongoing, Uses Indicators - Improved Health Outcomes

    The inspectors’ words, 249 words

    “QAPI-ONGOING;USES INDICATORS=IMPROVEMENT CFR(s): 494.110(a)(1) The program must include, but not be limited to, an ongoing program that achieves measurable improvement in health outcomes and reduction of medical errors by using indicators or performance measures associated with improved health outcomes and with the identification and reduction of medical errors. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff the facility failed to ensure an their QAPI program included evidence of measurable improvement in health outcomes and reduction of medical errors for seven (7) of seven (7) months of QAPI documentation. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both an in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally there was no documentation of an ongoing program that achieves measurable improvement in health outcomes and reduction of medical errors by using indicators or performance measures associated with improved health outcomes and with the identification and reduction of medical errors for both the inpatient and outpatient populations receiving treatment. Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/Davita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0627. Standard-level.

  • Qapi Indicator - Adequacy Of Dialysis

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “QAPI-INDICATOR-ADEQUACY OF DIALYSIS CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(i) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (i) Adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff the facility QAPI program failed to address the adequacy of dialysis for seven (7) of seven (7) months of QAPI documentation. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both an in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally there was no documentation the QAPI program addressed the adequacy of dialysis. Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/DaVita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0629. Standard-level.

  • Qapi Indicator - Nutritional Status

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “QAPI-INDICATOR-NUTRITIONAL STATUS CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(ii) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (ii) Nutritional status. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff the facilities QAPI program failed to track and trend problems with patient nutritional status for seven (7) of seven (7) months reviewed. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both an in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally, there was no documentation the QAPI program addressed patient nutritional status Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/DaVita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0630. Standard-level.

  • Qapi Indicator - Mineral Metabolism/Bone Disease

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “QAPI-INDICATOR-CKD-MBD CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(iii) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (iii) Mineral metabolism and renal bone disease. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff the facilities QAPI program failed to track and trend patient mineral metabolism and renal bone disease for seven (7) of seven (7) months reviewed. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both and in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally, there was no documentation showing the QAPI program addressed patient mineral metabolism and bone disease. Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/DaVita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0631. Standard-level.

  • Qapi Indicator - Anemia Management

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “QAPI-INDICATOR-ANEMIA MANAGEMENT CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(iv) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (iv) Anemia management. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff the facilities QAPI program failed to track and trend anemia management for seven (7) of seven (7) months reviewed. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both and in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally, there was no documentation the QAPI program addressed anemia management Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/Davita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0632. Standard-level.

  • Qapi Indicator - Vascular Access

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “QAPI-INDICATOR-VASCULAR ACCESS CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(v) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (v) Vascular access. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff the facilities QAPI program failed to track and trend patient vascular accesses for patients with long standing catheters for seven (7) of seven (7) months reviewed. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both and in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally, there was no documentation the QAPI program addressed vascular access Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/DaVita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0633. Standard-level.

  • Qapi Indicator - Medical Injuries/Errors

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “QAPI-INDICATOR-MEDICAL INJURIES/ERRORS CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(vi) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (vi) Medical injuries and medical errors identification. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff the facilities QAPI program failed to track and trend medical injuries and errors for seven (7) of seven (7) months reviewed. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both and in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally, there was no documentation the QAPI program addressed medical injuries and medical error identification Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/DaVita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0634. Standard-level.

  • Qapi Indicator - Infection Control - Trend/Plan/Act

    The inspectors’ words, 232 words

    “QAPI-INDICATOR-INF CONT-TREND/PLAN/ACT CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(ix) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (ix) Infection control; with respect to this component the facility must- (A) Analyze and document the incidence of infection to identify trends and establish baseline information on infection incidence; (B) Develop recommendations and action plans to minimize infection transmission, promote immunization; and (C) Take actions to reduce future incidents. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and interviews with facility staff, the facilities QAPI program failed to track and trend infections and establish baseline information on infection incidence for seven (7) of seven (7) months reviewed. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both and in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally, there was no documentation the QAPI program analyzed and documented the incidence of infection to identify trends and establish baseline information on infection incidence Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/DaVita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0637. Standard-level.

  • Prioritizing Improvement Activities

    The inspectors’ words, 210 words

    “QAPI-PRIORITIZING IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES CFR(s): 494.110(c) The dialysis facility must set priorities for performance improvement, considering prevalence and severity of identified problems and giving priority to improvement activities that affect clinical outcomes or patient safety. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility Quality assurance and performance improvement documentation (QAPI), and an interview with facility staff, the facility failed to set priorities for to improve activities that affect clinical outcomes or patient safety for seven (7) of seven (7) months reviewed. (12/24 through 6/25) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to QAPI Review of QAPI documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: The clinic has both and in-patient and out-patient dialysis programs. The QAPI program did not separate the in-patient from the out-patient programs. Additionally, there was no documentation the facility set priorities for performance improvement, considering prevalence and severity of identified problems and giving priority to improvement activities that affect clinical outcomes or patient safety. Interviews on 8/15/25 from approximately 9:30 AM through 11:30 AM with the regulatory performance improvement coordinator, GMC/DaVita liason, administrator and director of quality and patient safety confirmed the above findings”

    Rule V0639. Standard-level.

  • Responds To Nw Requests/Works Toward Goals

    The inspectors’ words, 195 words

    “GOV-RESPONDS TO NW REQUEST/WORKS TOWARD GOALS CFR(s): 494.180(i) The governing body receives and acts upon recommendations from the ESRD network. The dialysis facility must cooperate with the ESRD network designated for its geographic area, in fulfilling the terms of the Network’s current statement of work. Each facility must participate in ESRD network activities and pursue network goals. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21832 Based on review of policies and procedures, facility documentation, and an interview with facility staff, the governing body failed to receive and act upon recommendations from the ESRD network. There was no documentation the facility participated in ESRD network activities or pursued network goals for (2) two of (2) years reviewed. (2023 & 2024) Findings Include: Review of policies and procedures on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM failed to reveal any policies related to the ESRD network Review of facility documentation on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:00 AM failed to reveal any documentation or communication regarding the ESRD network. Interview on 8/15/25 at approximately 11:30 AM with the facility administrator confirmed the above findings and revealed the facility did not know anything about the ESRD network or purpose for same.”

    Rule V0772. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 15, 2025Standard inspection12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Mar 20, 1981.
  • Run as a non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 26 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “Not enough quality measure data to calculate a star rating.”
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Montour County, none has a star rating from CMS.
  • CMS gives this facility no star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Davita Justin Drive DialysisNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.