Hearth Record

Innovative Renal Care Roseburg

A dialysis facility in Roseburg, Oregon 97471

171 NW Medical Loop Ste 109, Roseburg, Oregon 97471. (541) 900-6910.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 20, 2024: a standard inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 20, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Carbon Adsorption - Monitoring, Testing Frequency

    The inspectors’ words, 558 words

    “CARBON ADSORP-MONITOR, TEST FREQUENCY CFR(s): 494.40(a) 6.2.5 Carbon adsorption: monitoring, testing freq Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be performed at the beginning of each treatment day prior to patients initiating treatment and again prior to the beginning of each patient shift. If there are no set patient shifts, testing should be performed approximately every 4 hours. Results of monitoring of free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be recorded in a log sheet. Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine can be accomplished using the N.N-diethyl-p-phenylene-diamine (DPD) based test kits or dip-and-read test strips. On-line monitors can be used to measure chloramine concentrations. Whichever test system is used, it must have sufficient sensitivity and specificity to resolve the maximum levels described in [AAMI] 4.1.1 (Table 1) [which is a maximum level of 0.1 mg/L]. Samples should be drawn when the system has been operating for at least 15 minutes. The analysis should be performed on-site, since chloramine levels will decrease if the sample is not assayed promptly. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on interview and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the chlorine test was performed according to facility policy and that the RO was running for at least 15 minutes prior to chlorine testing. Findings: Review of the “Total Chlorine Log” for November 2024 revealed: - On 11/04/2024 chlorine tests were documented as completed at 0715 and 1035. It could not be determined if the “3rd Chlorine Check” test was completed within the 4-hour timeframe due to an illegibly written time. * During interviews with the Clinic Manager on 11/20/2024 at 1225 and with the Biomed tech at 1255, neither could verify what time the test was completed. - On 11/18/2024 there was no documentation that the RO was turned on and running for 15 minutes before the first test of the day. The column was blank for “RO on for 15 min.? Y/N.” - On 11/19/2024 the “1st Chlorine Check ... 2nd Chlorine Check ... 3rd Chlorine Check” lacked documentation that the checks were verified by a second staff. The box for “2nd check Initials” for all three checks was blank. - On 11/20/2024 the “2nd Chlorine Check” lacked documentation that the check was verified by a second staff. The box for “2nd check Initials” was blank. Similar findings were identified for the “2nd Chlorine Check” on 10/25/2024. Review of the facility policy, “IC23 Total Chlorine Testing” dated as last revised 04/2023 stipulated: - “Chlorine/chloramine levels must be tested at the beginning of each treatment day prior to patients initiating treatment and again prior to the beginning of each patient shift or every 4 hours; whichever comes first.” - “Two trained personnel, one of whom must be a direct care staff member, will verify Total Chlorine Test results.” During interview with the CM on 11/20/2024 at 1225 the above findings were confirmed. Should the carbon tanks become exhausted, chlorine breakthrough could occur potentially exposing patients to chloramine in the water used to prepare dialysate. Patient safety can only be ensured by monitoring the performance of the carbon adsorption bed at least every 4 hours. Exposure of patients to chloramine levels > 0.1 could potentially have an adverse affect on their health including but not limited to hemolysis and/or death.”

    Rule V0196. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 318 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on interview and review of documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that that all equipment was maintained in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations. Findings: * Review of the “TDS Meter Calibration Log” for November 2024 revealed the following instructions listed on the bottom of the form: - “Daily Requirement: Check against internal Standard.” - “Weekly Requirement: Perform FULL Calibration.” - “Weekly Requirement: Verify Calculated Percent Rejection against RO Displayed Value.” Daily checks were missed on 11/04/2024, 11/13/2024, 11/15/2024, 11/18/2024 and 11/20/2024. Three weekly calibrations were completed between 11/07/2024 and 11/13/2024. No data was documented after 11/13/2024. During interview with the Clinic Manager on 11/20/2024 at 1225, they stated that they were not completely sure how often the TDS Meter Calibration log needed to be completed. They stated they thought the log was to be done weekly and that the calibration was being done too often. During interview with the Biomed tech on 11/20/2024 at 1255, they verified that some daily checks were missed and that daily checks and weekly calibrations were required. * Review of the “RO #1 Water System Log Sheet” revealed that staff failed to initial the “Operator” row on 11/19/2024. * Review of the “Pretreatment Water System Log” revealed: - On 11/18/2024 staff failed to document the value for “No Post Softener Hardness PM” and failed to initial the log was complete for the day. - On 10/31/2021 staff failed to document the value for “No Post Softener Hardness PM” and failed to initial the log was complete for the day. The Clinic Manager confirmed the above findings on 11/20/2024 at 1225.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

  • Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx

    The inspectors’ words, 360 words

    “PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on interview, medical record review for 1 of 2 patients (Patient #1) and review of documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all patient assessments were documented every 30 minutes according to facility policy Findings: Review of Patient #1’s treatment flowsheets revealed that documentation visual checks for assessment of the patient’s access and face are only documented within the “Notes” section of the flowsheets. The dialysis machine automatically documents the patient’s VS (including BP and Pulse). Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 11/15/2024 revealed that at 1137, staff documented “Patient denies any complaints, access visible.” At 1229, staff documented “Patient denies any complaints, access visible.” Between 1137 and 1229 (52 minutes), staff documented notes, but failed to document the access or face was visualized. Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 11/20/2024 revealed that at 1031 staff documented “pt awake and alert, denies any complaints, access visible, will cont to monitor.” At 1100 staff documented “pt awake and alert with no concerns or complaints. bp is stable pt awake and playing on phone.” At 1130 staff documented pt resting, alert and awake, no complaints.” Treatment was terminated at 1136. Visualization of face and access failed to be documented between 1031 and 1136 (65 minutes). Similar findings were identified for treatment flowsheets dated: 11/18/2024, 11/15/2024, 11/11/2024, 11/08/2024, 11/06/2024, 11/04/2024, 11/01/2024, 10/25/2024, and 10/23/2024. Review of the facility policy, “IC08 Monitoring & Documentation of Patient Care During Treatment,” dated as last revised 11/29/2022 stipulated “10. Data that must be documented (by direct entry and/or by data feed from the dialysis machine) at least every 30 minutes and PRN depending on the patient’s condition includes, but is not limited to ... Visibility of the vascular access and interventions taken to address non-visibility of the access.” On 11/20/2024 at 1530, the CM confirmed that visualization of the access and face are put in the EHR directly by staff and should be documented every 30 minutes.”

    Rule V0503. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 20, 2024Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 6, 2024.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Other.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 12 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Other chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “Not enough quality measure data to calculate a star rating.”
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Douglas County, 1 has a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS gives this facility no star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Davita Roseburg Mercy Dialysis1

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.