Hearth Record

Fresenius Kidney Care Tualatin

A dialysis facility in Tualatin, Oregon 97062

8050 SW Warm Springs St Ste 120, Tualatin, Oregon 97062. (503) 612-1254.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 12, 2024: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 12, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 253 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the building was maintained to ensure the safety of patients, staff and the public. Findings: Observation of the facility on 09/11/2024 beginning at 0910 revealed: - Three D-cell batteries located in the Emergency Light Center box expired in March 2023. - Two “ChemLight Tactical Light” sticks located in the Emergency Light Center box expired in May 2023. - Areas where the floor in the facility could not be cleaned effectively for infection control purposes. * In treatment room #7, there was a gap in the floor where the seams were separating in a section of flooring below the window. *In the hallway there were two areas along the baseboard where the floor had been cut away, leaving unfilled gouges. The CM stated during interview on 09/11/2024 at 1005 that the gouges were due to the removal of a door. *Also in the main hallway, the seams are pulling apart where three flooring types meet. Review of the document titled “Action Plan” that listed the facility’s current QAPI action plans revealed an entry listed under “Update #3 (04/22/2024)” that stated “2 Laminate holes in hallway flooring needing patched. Denied by Corp.” The above findings were confirmed by the CM on 09/11/2024 at 1015.”

    Rule V0401. Standard-level.

  • F/U Reassessment - Within 3 Months Of Initial

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “PA-F/U REASSESSMENT-WITHIN 3 MO OF INITIAL CFR(s): 494.80(b)(2) A follow up comprehensive reassessment must occur within 3 months after the completion of the initial assessment to provide information to adjust the patient’s plan of care specified in §494.90. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on review of medical records and review of documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a follow up comprehensive reassessment occurred for 1 of 5 patients (Patient #4) within 90 days of the completion of the initial assessment to provide information to adjust the patient’s plan of care. Findings: Review of Patient #4’s medical record revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 03/18/2024. The initial 30-day assessment and POC meeting was completed on 04/15/2024. The next POC meeting, 90 days from the initial assessment, should have been on or before 07/14/2024. The POC meeting was held on 09/04/2024, 52 days beyond the 90-day requirement. Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care,” dated as 07/03/2023 stipulated in the section titled, “CIA and POC for Patients New to Dialysis” that “A follow up CIA must occur within 90 days. The POC should be adjusted as appropriate and implemented with 15 days of reassessment.””

    Rule V0517. Standard-level.

  • Poc Completed/Signed By Idt & Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 406 words

    “POC-COMPLETED/SIGNED BY IDT & PT CFR(s): 494.90(b)(1) The patient’s plan of care must- (i) Be completed by the interdisciplinary team, including the patient if the patient desires; and (ii) Be signed by the team members, including the patient or the patient’s designee; or, if the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice must be documented on the plan of care, along with the reason the signature was not provided. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on interview, review patient medical records and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 3 of 5 patients’ POCs (Patient #s 1, 3 and 4) were signed by the patient and/or patient’s designee. Findings: Patient #1 Review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed a Plan of Care dated 08/21/2024. The POC was approved by the MD, RN, MSW and RD on 08/21/2024. The facility failed to provide documentation of the patient or patient designee’s signature that signified the patient either attended the meeting, that an IDT member reviewed the POC with the patient or that the patient declined to sign the POC. Review of “RN Home Therapy Progress Note” dated 09/06/2024 revealed the patient had a scheduled clinic visit on 09/06/2024. The facility failed to provide documentation that the POC was reviewed with the patient or patient designee during that visit. - Similar findings were identified for Patent #4. Patient #3 Review of Patient #3’s medical record revealed POCs for the following dates: 02/21/2024, 03/15/2024, 04/15/2024, 05/16/2024, 06/27/2024, 07/16/2024 and 08/20/2024. The patient’s status was listed as unstable during all months listed above except for 02/21/2024 where the patient was listed as stable. The facility failed to provide documentation that the POCs were reviewed by the patient, or patient’s designee, for meetings held on 02/21/2024, 03/15/2024, 04/15/2024, 06/27/2024, 07/16/2024 and 08/20/2024. Review of the facility policy, “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care,” dated as 07/03/2023 stipulated in the section titled, “Comprehensive Assessment Participation and Plan of Care Review,” that “The patient’s level of participation is determined by the patient. The patient must sign the plan of care meant to acknowledge the information in the plan. If the patient chooses not to sign their plan of care, the reason for refusal must be documented in the patient’s medical record.” On 09/11/2024 at 1630, the CM confirmed the lack of the patient’s signature for the plans of care.”

    Rule V0556. Standard-level.

  • Initial Poc Implemented - 30 Days/13 Tx

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “POC-INITIAL IMPLEMENTED-30 DAYS/13 TX CFR(s): 494.90(b)(2) Implementation of the initial plan of care must begin within the latter of 30 calendar days after admission to the dialysis facility or 13 outpatient hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first outpatient dialysis session. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on review of patient medical records and review of documentation, it was determined the facility failed to complete or implement an initial plan of care that identified the immediate individual patient care needs for 1 of 5 patients (Patient #1). Findings: Patient #1 was admitted to the facility on 07/08/2024 as an HCCPD patient. Review of Patient #1’s care plan revealed the Initial CIA, Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment, and Plan of Care meeting was completed on 08/21/2024, 44 days after the date of admission. Review of the facility policy, “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care,” dated as 07/03/2023 stipulated in the section titled, “CIA and POC for Patients New to Dialysis,” that an initial comprehensive interdisciplinary assessment (CIA) and plan of care (POC) must be conducted on all patients new to dialysis within the later of 30 calendar days or 13 outpatient hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first outpatient dialysis session.””

    Rule V0557. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 12, 2024Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 27, 2016.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 0 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Washington County, 9 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 7 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.