Hearth Record

Kaiser Sunnybrook Peritoneal Dialysis Facility

A dialysis facility in Clackamas, Oregon 97015

9900 SE Sunnyside Rd, Clackamas, Oregon 97015. (503) 571-7240.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 9, 2023: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 9, 2023: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Policies For Evac. And Primary/Alt. Comm.

    The inspectors’ words, 488 words

    “Policies for Evac. and Primary/Alt. Comm. CFR(s): §403.748(b)(3), §416.54(b)(2), §418.113(b)(6)(ii), §441.184(b)(3), §460.84(b)(3), §482.15(b)(3), §483.73(b)(3), §483.475(b)(3), §485.68(b)(1), §485.542(b)(3), §485.625(b)(3), §485.727(b)(1), §485.920(b)(2), §491.12(b)(1), §494.62(b)(2) [(b) Policies and procedures. The [facilities] must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] [(3) or (1), (2), (6)] Safe evacuation from the [facility], which includes consideration of care and treatment needs of evacuees; staff responsibilities; transportation; identification of evacuation location(s); and primary and alternate means of communication with external sources of assistance. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(b)(3) and ASCs at §416.54(b)(2) and REHs at §485.542(b)(3):] Safe evacuation from the [RNHCI or ASC or REHs] which includes the following: (i) Consideration of care needs of evacuees. (ii) Staff responsibilities. (iii) Transportation. (iv) Identification of evacuation location(s). (v) Primary and alternate means of communication with external sources of assistance. * [For CORFs at §485.68(b)(1), Clinics, Rehabilitation Agencies, OPT/Speech at §485.727(b)(1), and ESRD Facilities at §494.62(b)(2):] Safe evacuation from the [CORF; Clinics, Rehabilitation Agencies, and Public Health Agencies as Providers of Outpatient Physical Therapy and Speech-Language Pathology Services; and ESRD Facilities], which includes staff responsibilities, and needs of the patients. * [For RHCs/FQHCs at §491.12(b)(1):] Safe evacuation from the RHC/FQHC, which includes appropriate placement of exit signs; staff responsibilities and needs of the patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37898 Based on observation, interview and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure that emergency equipment necessary to meet the needs of the patients in the event of evacuation was monitored and maintained according to facility policy. Findings: Observation of the emergency evacuation kit located in the medication room on 11/08/2023 at 1000 revealed: * 7 of 7 “stay safe Cap” closure caps expired 08/31/2023; and * 2 of 3 IV start sets expired 07/31/2023. Review of “SYB Peritoneal Dialysis Emergency Evacuation Kit” monthly check documentation revealed that the last evacuation kit check documented was dated “Aug ‘23.” Further review of documentation revealed that the monthly check signed off on “8/4/23” noted the “IV Start Kit” expiration date of “7/31/23.” Review of the facility policy titled “MERBs (Adult and Peds), AED Equipment, Broselow and Emergency Medication Checks,” with a last revision date of 12/15/2022, stipulated “Procedures ... Perform and document the following monthly checks by utilizing the standardized checklist for your level of response ... Open MERB and check entire contents of bag for expiration dates; completeness of supplies and operational flashlight batteries ... Remove and replace any items within a month of expiration.” During interview with the Facility Manager on 11/08/2023 at 1455, they confirmed the findings.”

    Rule E0020. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 233 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37898 Based on interview and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to maintain all equipment in accordance with facility policy as required to ensure a safe and functional environment was provided. Findings: Review of “Emergency Eyewash Station Weekly Inspection Checklist” documentation revealed that weekly inspection of the facility’s 6 eyewash stations (Treatment Rooms #1 - 4, Medication Room, Dirty Utility) was performed inconsistently throughout 2023. Findings include, but are not limited to: * Treatment Room #1: A check was documented on “5/10/23,” the next check was documented 26 days later on “6/5/23,” and the next check was documented 38 days later on “7/13/23.” * Treatment Room #2: A check was documented on “5/10/23,” and the next check was documented 64 days later on “7/13/23.” Similar findings were noted on documentation for the 4 remaining eyewash stations. Review of the facility policy titled “Emergency Eyewash and Deluge Shower Program” with a last reviewed date of “11/18” stipulated “1. Department Manager or Supervisors are responsible for: ... e. Weekly testing of eyewashes and showers and documentation.” During interview with the Facility Manager on 11/08/2023 at 1447, they confirmed “It was missed.””

    Rule V0401. Standard-level.

  • Poc Completed/Signed By Idt & Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 375 words

    “POC-COMPLETED/SIGNED BY IDT & PT CFR(s): 494.90(b)(1) The patient’s plan of care must- (i) Be completed by the interdisciplinary team, including the patient if the patient desires; and (ii) Be signed by the team members, including the patient or the patient’s designee; or, if the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice must be documented on the plan of care, along with the reason the signature was not provided. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37898 Based on interview, medical record review, and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the patient plan of care was signed by the patient, or the patient’s designee, in a timely manner for 2 of 5 patient records reviewed (Patients #3 and 5). Findings: Patient #3 Review of the medical record revealed an Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and patient Plan of Care were completed on 06/22/2023. The plan of care was signed by the patient on 10/10/2023. Patient #5 Review of the medical record revealed an Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and patient Plan of Care were completed on 09/28/2023. As of the review on 11/09/2023, “Signature pending” was listed for the patient participation section. Review of the facility policy titled “Comprehensive Patient Assessment and Plan of Care,” with a last revision date of 01/24/2022, revealed that the “Interdisciplinary team (IDT)” consisted of “at a minimum, the patient or the patient’s personal representative (caregiver), a Registered Nurse (RN), a Nephrology Clinician treating the patient for End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), a Social Worker (SW), and a Registered Dietician (RD).” The policy stipulated that the “Interdisciplinary team develops and implements a written, individualized, comprehensive POC on all new patients or patients that transfer into the facility.” Further review of the facilty policy stipulated “Documentation ... Minimum Documentation Standards for Registered Nurse Encounters ... Implement and communicate POC changes within the IDT ... Sign the POC and CPA - if a signature is withheld, it should be documented by whom and why.” During interview with the Facility Manager and the Facility Manager of a sister facility on 11/09/2023 at 1045, the above findings were acknowledged and they agreed that the POC should be signed by the patient in a more timely manner.”

    Rule V0556. Standard-level.

  • Implement Updates Of Poc - 15 Days P Pt Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “POC-IMPLEMENT UPDATE-15 DAYS P PT ASSESS CFR(s): 494.90(b)(2) Implementation of monthly or annual updates of the plan of care must be performed within 15 days of the completion of the additional patient assessments specified in §494.80(d). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37898 Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated monthly for 1 of 2 patients assessed as unstable (Patient #2). Findings: Patient #2 Review of the Plan of Care dated 09/27/2023 revealed Patient #4 was listed as “unstable due to unmanaged anemia, unmet adequacy, unmet nutrition goal.” As of 11/09/2023, the medical record lacked documentation of the required monthly POC update. Review of the facility policy titled “Comprehensive Patient Assessment and Plan of Care,” with a last revision date of 01/24/2022, stipulated “Revision of the POC with a comprehensive re-assessment of each patient: ... At least monthly for unstable patients.” During interview with the Facility Manager and the Facility Manager of a sister facility on 11/09/2023 at 1045, they confirmed the findings.”

    Rule V0558. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 9, 2023Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 20, 2016.
  • Run as a non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Kaiser Permanente.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer in-center hemodialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 0 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Kaiser Permanente chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, better than expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Clackamas County, 5 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.