Pnrs Eastern Oregon Dialysis Clinic
A dialysis facility in Island City, Oregon 97850
10601 S Walton Rd, Island City, Oregon 97850. (541) 663-8420.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 12 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 26, 2025: a standard inspection.
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jun 26, 2025: standard inspection9 deficiencies
-
Ep Testing Requirements
The inspectors’ words, 2,013 words
“EP Testing Requirements CFR(s): §416.54(d)(2), §418.113(d)(2), §441.184(d)(2), §460.84(d)(2), §482.15(d)(2), §483.73(d)(2), §483.475(d)(2), §484.102(d)(2), §485.68(d)(2), §485.542(d)(2), §485.625(d)(2), §485.727(d)(2), §485.920(d)(2), §491.12(d)(2), §494.62(d)(2). *[For ASCs at §416.54, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, OPO, “Organizations” under §485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, RHCs/FQHCs at §491.12, and ESRD Facilities at §494.62]: (2) Testing. The [facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan annually. The [facility] must do all of the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based every 2 years; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct a facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the [facility] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the actual event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise at least every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For Hospices at 418.113(d):] (2) Testing for hospices that provide care in the patient’s home. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community based every 2 years; or (A) When a community based exercise is not accessible, conduct an individual facility based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospital is exempt from engaging in its next required full scale community-based exercise or individual facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (3) Testing for hospices that provide inpatient care directly. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospice is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop led by a facilitator that includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the hospice’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the hospice’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For PRFTs at §441.184(d), Hospitals at §482.15(d), CAHs at §485.625(d):] (2) Testing. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an [additional] annual exercise or and that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For PACE at §460.84(d):] (2) Testing. The PACE organization must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The PACE organization must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the PACE experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the PACE is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the PACE’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the PACE’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(d):] (2) The [LTC facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year, including unannounced staff drills using the emergency procedures. The [LTC facility, ICF/IID] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise. (B) If the [LTC facility] facility experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the LTC facility is exempt from engaging its next required a full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [LTC facility] facility’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [LTC facility] facility’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d)]: (2) Testing. The ICF/IID must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year. The ICF/IID must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or. (B) If the ICF/IID experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the ICF/IID is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the ICF/IID’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the ICF/IID’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For HHAs at §484.102] (d)(2) Testing. The HHA must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The HHA must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or. (B) If the HHA experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the HHA is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the HHA’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the HHA’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For OPOs at §486.360] (d)(2) Testing. The OPO must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The OPO must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise or workshop at least annually. A tabletop exercise is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. If the OPO experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the OPO is exempt from engaging in its next required testing exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Analyze the OPO’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [RNHCI’s and OPO’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[ RNCHIs at §403.748]: (d)(2) Testing. The RNHCI must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The RNHCI must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise at least annually. A tabletop exercise is a group discussion led by a facilitator, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (ii) Analyze the RNHCI’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the RNHCI’s emergency plan, as needed. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on interview and review of documentation, it was determined the facility failed to complete a full-scale community/facility wide exercise every two years. Findings: Review of documentation revealed a fire disaster tabletop exercise was completed on 05/30/2023, and an earthquake disaster tabletop was completed on 10/24/2024. On 06/25/2025 at 1540, the CM confirmed a community/facility wide full-scale exercise was not completed during 2023 or 2024.”
-
Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area
The inspectors’ words, 213 words
“IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on observation and review of documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff did not eat in the treatment area. Findings: Observation of the nursing station in the treatment area on 06/26/2025 at 1235 revealed two pieces of candy remained visible on the desk and two bags of hard candies and a bag of cough drops were stored in the drawer at the nurses’ station. Review of the facility policy, “General Cleanliness and Infection Control Guidelines,” dated as “Published 05/05/2025” stipulated: “Eating, drinking, applying cosmetics or lip balm, and handling contact lenses are prohibited in work areas where there is a reasonable likelihood of occupational exposure ... Food and drink shall not be kept in refrigerators, freezers, shelves, cabinets or on countertops or benchtops where blood or other potentially infectious materials are present.””
-
Ic - Hbv - Test All Pts, Review Results/Pt Status Known Preadmit
The inspectors’ words, 599 words
“IC: HBV: TEST ALL,REV RESULTS/STATUS B4 ADMIT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Routine Testing for Hepatitis B The HBV serological status (i.e. HBsAg, total anti-HBc and anti-HBs) of all patients should be known before admission to the hemodialysis unit. Routinely test all patients [as required by the referenced schedule for routine testing for Hepatitis B Virus]. Promptly review results, and ensure that patients are managed appropriately based on their testing results. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on interview, review of patients’ immunization records and review of documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that for 3 of 40 patients (Patients 6, 12 and 15): - The HBV serological status of all patients was known before admission; - That patients were routinely tested as required; and - That patients were offered the Hep B immunization series. Findings: Patient #6 Review of the facility’s “Hepatitis B Summary Report,” created “06/25/2025,” that included documentation of Hepatitis B vaccination status of 40 patients revealed Patient #6, with an admission date of 04/24/2025, lacked documentation for the “Most Recent Hep B core Ab Total (anti-HBc)” and “Most Recent Hep B Surface Ab Result (anti-HBs).” Patient #15 Review of the facility’s “Hepatitis B Summary Report,” created “06/25/2025,” that included documentation of Hepatitis B vaccination status of 40 patients revealed: - Patient #15’s “Most Recent Hepatitis Status” was listed as susceptible as of 05/20/2024. The “Suggested Actions” listed “Monthly ABsAg testing per policy. Offer Vaccine Annually.” * Review of the monthly Hep B Surface Ag (HBsAg) testing revealed tests were done 06/26/2024, 02/15/2025, 03/10/2025, 04/14/2025, 05/12/2025 and 06/02/2025. There were no monthly results documented for 7 months between July 2024 through January 2025. - In the section “Facility Non-Administer Reason” the facility documented “Vaccination Refused by Patient 08/24/2023.” The facility failed to provide documentation that the patient received further education or was offered the vaccine since 2023. Patient #12 Review of the facility’s “Hepatitis B Summary Report,” created “06/25/2025,” that included documentation of Hepatitis B vaccination status of 40 patients revealed Patient #12 was admitted to the facility on 04/23/2025. The patient tested as susceptible on 04/23/2025. As of 06/24/2025, the facility failed to provide documentation that the patient was offered the Hep B immunization series. * During interview with the CM on 06/26/2025 at approximately 0850, they stated the patient’s 1st vaccine dose in May was not given and was rescheduled to June. As of 06/24/2025, the patient had not started the immunization series. Review of the facility policy titled, “Patient Hepatitis B Testing Requirements,” dated as “Published 02/03/2025” stipulated: * “HBV status should be known prior to admission for all new patients.” * “If Hepatitis B Surface antibody (anti-HBs), and Hepatitis B core antibody ‘total’ (anti-HBc ‘total’) are not available prior to admission, obtain a physician order to immediately draw blood specimens and submit for testing. Anti-HBs and anti HBc ‘total’ results must be available within 7 days of admission.” Review of the facility policy titled, “Patient Vaccination for Hepatitis B,” dated as “Published 02/07/2022” stipulated: * “The Hepatitis B vaccine shall be offered to all susceptible patients including peritoneal and home hemodialysis patients.” * “Patients who are candidates for hepatitis B vaccine and decline, should be offered the Hepatitis B vaccine on an annual basis, at minimum. Provide patient education as needed ... A vaccine declination must be signed by the patient each year the vaccine is offered and refused ... Each offering of the vaccine should be documented in the patient’s medical record.” During an interview with the CM on 06/25/2025 at 1540, they confirmed the above findings.”
-
Ic - Hbv - Isolation Of Machines/Equipment/Supplies
The inspectors’ words, 302 words
“IC-HBV-ISOLATION-MACHINES/EQUIP/SUPPLIES CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Isolation of HBV+ Patients To isolate HBsAg positive patients, ... dedicate machines, equipment, instruments, supplies, and medications that will not be used by HBV susceptible patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on observation and the review of documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that equipment and supplies used for isolation patients were labeled. Findings included, but not were not limited to: Observation of the isolation room on 06/24/2025 at 0850 revealed the following items found in the isolation room were not labeled for isolation only: - The dialysis machine - The dialysis treatment chair - A stethoscope - The centrifuge - A scale - A stool - A face shield - A biohazard bin - Clamps - A sharps container - A trash can - A gallon bleach container - A portable oxygen concentrator - A container of test strips - A small portable table - Multiple spray bottles Further observations revealed: - The rim of the drain of the dirty sink was surrounded by a black substance and the drain had a green substance inside. - A green substance surrounded the drain rim and was inside the drain of the clean sink. Review of the facility policy “Dialyzing Patients with Positive Hepatitis B Antigen (HBsAg+),” dated as Published: 06/04/2025” stipulated: * “If ... There are current HBsAg positive patients on census ... Then ... Equipment cannot be used for HBV negative patients on other shifts or days due to the risk of cross contamination. Equipment used for HBsAg positive patients should be reserved for the HBsAg positive patient unless repair or maintenance is needed.” * “All supplies used in the isolation room/area such as clamps, blood pressure cuffs, testing reagents, etc., should be labeled ‘isolation’ and not routinely removed.””
-
Dialysate Proportioning - Monitor Ph/Conductivity
The inspectors’ words, 245 words
“DIALYS PROPORT-MONITOR PH/CONDUCTIVITY CFR(s): 494.40(a) 5.6 Dialysate proportioning: monitor pH/conductivity It is necessary for the operator to follow the manufacturer’s instructions regarding dialysate conductivity and to measure approximate pH with an independent method before starting the treatment of the next patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47148 Based review of documentation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility’s procedure regarding verifying the calibration of the approximate potential of hydrogen (pH) of the dialysate meter prior to initiating daily hemodialysis treatments. Findings: Observation of the facility records titled, “Myron L D-6 Meter Verification (Daily)” for the months of April, May and June 2025 revealed the documentation of the numeric value was to the tenth decimal point versus the hundredth decimal point which did not allow for verification whether or not the value was within the acceptable range. An example included, but not limited to: “4.0” when the acceptable levels were 3.96 to 4.04 and “7.0” when the acceptable levels were 6.96 to 7.04. - The April 2025 report revealed incomplete documentation for 12 out of 26 days the facility provided hemodialysis treatments. - The May 2025 report revealed incomplete documentation for 11 out of 21 days the facility provided hemodialysis treatments. - The June 2025 report revealed incomplete documentation for 5 out of 10 days the facility provided hemodialysis treatments. During an interview with the CM on 06/25/2025 at approximately 1520, the above findings were confirmed.”
-
Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment
The inspectors’ words, 347 words
“PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for the patients, staff and public. Findings: Observations of the facility on 06/24/2025 beginning at 0840 revealed the following: - The countertop in the lab area had remnants of white paper stuck to the surface. - The fire extinguisher in the lab area lacked the monthly check in June. All other fire extinguishes in the facility were checked 06/19/2025, the one in the lab area was last signed off by staff on 05/09/2025. - The eyewash station in the lab area, attached to the dirty sink, lacked nozzle covers thereby leaving the nozzles exposed to dirt and debris. - The eyewash basin in the supply room was stained and many of the eyewash nozzle holes were covered by a black substance. - The eyewash station in the HHD training room lacked an identifying label. - The saline prime bucket on the dialysis machine at station 6 had a large brown stain inside. - There were white stains on the floor around treatment staton 1. On 06/26/2025 at 1700, the CM stated that the stain can be cleaned but comes back due to a leak. The following items were found to be expired and available for use: - A box of 36 “Crit-Line ... Blood Chambers” expired 11/30/2024. - A box of “ChloraPrep One-Step” single swab sticks expired 06/17/2025. - 6 boxes of “Tempa-DOTs,” temperature testing strips, expired between 11/16/2024 and 03/13/2025. - A box of 1000 “Povidone-Iodine” prep pads expired 03/30/2025. - A box of 24 “NxStage Express Fluid Warmer Disposable Sets” expired 12/24/2024. - 3 containers of “EZ Chek Blood Leak Test Strips” expired 04/30/2025. - 2 containers of “EZ Chek Ozone Test Strips” expired 05/31/2025. The CM and ATL confirmed the above findings on 06/26/2025 at 1700.”
-
Rights Posted With State/Nw Contact #S And Addresses
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“PR-RIGHTS POSTED,STATE/NW ONTACT INFO CFR(s): 494.70(c) The dialysis facility must prominently display a copy of the patient’s rights in the facility, including the current State agency and ESRD network mailing addresses and telephone complaint numbers, where it can be easily seen and read by patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47148 Based on observation, it was determined the facility failed to prominently display the current State agency mailing addresses and telephone complaint numbers where it can be easily seen and read by patients. Findings: During observation of the facility lobby/waiting area on 06/25/2025 at 0835, the facility failed to have correct information posted that provided the mailing address, contact information and phone number for complaints to the State survey agency. During an interview with the CM on 06/25/2025 at 1520, the above findings were confirmed.”
-
Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx
The inspectors’ words, 489 words
“PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47148 Based on interview, review of medical records, and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that patients received hemodialysis treatments as prescribed and that VS monitoring was completed according to facility policy for 3 of 5 in-center hemodialysis patients reviewed (Patient #s 1, 2 and 3.) Findings: Patient #2 Review of Patient #2’s Treatment Details Reports dated 05/21/2025 through 06/25/2025 (14 treatments) revealed the following: - Physician orders for hemodialysis treatment included a prescription for “DFR 600.” * On 05/21/2025 at 1606, the RN increased the DFR from 600 ml/min to 800 ml/min without any documentation as to why the increase was initiated. *Similar findings were identified on treatment sheets dated: 05/26/2025 and 06/25/2025. - Similar findings were identified for Patient #1. - On 06/13/2025, VS and patient assessment checks were documented at 1601. The next access check and face visualization were documented 59 minutes later at 1700. - Similar findings were identified for Patient #1. - Physician orders for hemodialysis treatment included a prescription for “Scheduled Hours: 03:00.” On 06/16/2025, treatment was initiated at 1511 and completed 2 hours and 22 minutes later at 1733. The treatment was shortened by 38 minutes. At 1722, the RN documented “Treatment ended early per pt request ...” There was no AMA documentation provided for the shortened treatment time. * Similar findings were identified for treatment sheets dated: 06/04/2025, 06/09/2024 and 06/13/2025. Patient #3 Review of Patient #3’s Treatment Details Reports dated 05/23/2025 through 06/25/2025 (15 treatments) revealed the following: - Physician orders for hemodialysis treatment included a prescription for “BFR 450” - On 05/26/2025, at 0546, a PCT set the BFR at 400 ml/min and initiated treatment. At 0557, an RN documented they verified the machine settings matched the prescription. The BFR remained at 400ml/min throughout the duration of the treatment. * Similar findings on treatment sheets dated: 05/30/2025 and 06/20/2025. - On 06/25/2025, at 0538, a PCT initiated treatment and performed an AFT. At 0738, an RN documented the BFR at 400 ml/min where it remained throughout the duration of the treatment. * Similar findings on treatment sheets dated: 06/04/2025. Review of facility policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” dated 05/01/2023, stipulated: * “Obtain blood pressure and pulse rate every 30 minutes or more as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations.” * “Document machine parameters and safety checks every 30 [min] or more often as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations.” * “Check prescribed blood flow is being achieved or reason is documented in medical record if unable to meet prescribed blood flow.” * “Check dialysate flow rate setting is correct, and the prescribed flow is being delivered.””
-
Immunization/Medication History
The inspectors’ words, 251 words
“PA-IMMUNIZATION/MEDICATION HISTORY CFR(s): 494.80(a)(3) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Immunization history, and medication history. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37237 Based on interview and review of documentation, it was determined the facility failed to implement facility policy that ensured pneumococcal vaccines were offered to qualifying patients for 10 of 39 patients reviewed (Patient #s 5 - 14). Findings: 1. Review of the Pneumonia Vaccination Report dated 06/24/2025 revealed the following: - Patient #5 had an order for a pneumococcal vaccine, but the vaccine was not administered in a timely manner. The last pneumococcal vaccination given was PCV13 on 12/13/2019 with an order to “Admin PCV20 as ordered on or after last dose 12/13/2024.” The vaccine had not been administered as of the 06/24/2025 report. *Similar findings were identified for Patient #s 8, 9 and 10. - Patient #6 was listed as “Vaccination Candidate” with the “Suggested Action(s)” listed as “Admin PCV20 as ordered on or after 06/25/2025.” The vaccine had not been administered as of the 06/25/2025 . * Similar findings were identified for Patient #s 7, 11, 12, 13 and 14. Review of the facility policy titled, “Pneumococcal Vaccine for Adult Patients,” dated as “Published: 02/25/2024,” stipulated: * “Adults who have previously been vaccinated with Prevnar 13 (PCV 13) and/or Pneumovax 23 (PPSV23) should follow the CMAB algorithm for recommended vaccine schedule.” During an interview with the CM and ATL on 06/26/2025 at 0850, the above findings were confirmed.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | Standard inspection | 9 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Apr 30, 1999.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 12 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Union County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.