Hearth Record

Sanderling Dialysis Center of Holdenville

A dialysis facility in Holdenville, Oklahoma 74848

102 Crestview Dr, Holdenville, Oklahoma 74848. (855) 759-7365.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 8, 2025: a complaint and standard inspection.

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 4 of them at condition level, the most serious.

4 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 8, 2025: complaint and standard inspection13 deficiencies
  • Cfc - Physical Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 176 words

    “CFC-PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain and provide dialysis patients, staff, and visitors a physical environment that was safe and free of defects and hazards in four of four areas (Lobby, Storage/Machine Repair area, Water Treatment area, and Hemodialysis Treatment area). Findings included: ~ The facility failed to maintain the building to ensure all systems were functional and provided dialysis patients, staff, and the public, a safe and functional environment in one of one area (Lobby). Cross refer to V401. ~ The facility failed to maintain the building free from defects and/or hazards in three of three areas (Lobby, Storage/Machine Repair area, Water Treatment area). Cross refer to V402. ~ The facility failed to maintain the equipment in three of three areas (Storage/Machine Repair area, Water Treatment area, and Hemodialysis Treatment area). Cross refer to V403. ~ The facility failed to ensure one of one patient (Patient #1) was in view during the hemodialysis treatment. Cross refer to V407.”

    Rule V0400. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Cfc - Patient Assessment

    “CFC-PATIENT ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 494.80 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on record review and interview, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed to ensure four of four patients (Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8) had a comprehensive assessment of their needs. Findings included: ~ The facility failed to ensure the Registered Nurse (RN) and the attending Physician provided four of four patients (Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8) with an individualized and comprehensive assessment as part of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). Cross refer to V501.”

    Rule V0500. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Cfc: Patient Plan Of Care

    “CFC-PATIENT PLAN OF CARE CFR(s): 494.90 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on record review and interview, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed to develop and implement the plans of care for four of four patients (Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8). Findings included: ~ The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed to develop and implement a complete comprehensive plan of care for four of four patients (Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8). Cross refer to V542.”

    Rule V0540. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Cfc - Responsibilities Of The Medical Director

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “CFC-RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR CFR(s): 494.150 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observations, record review, and interview, the medical director did not demonstrate responsibility to ensure: 1) 1 physical environment was safe for patients, staff, and visitors, and 2) prescribed care and/or necessary services was provided to all patients, and visitors. Findings included: ~ The facility failed to maintain and provide dialysis patients, staff, and visitors a physical environment that was safe and free of defects and hazards in four of four areas (Lobby, Storage/Machine Repair area, Water Treatment area, and Hemodialysis Treatment area). Cross refer to V400. ~ The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed to ensure four of four patients (Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8) had a comprehensive assessment of their needs. Cross refer to V500. ~ The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed to develop and implement the plans of care for four of four patients (Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8). Cross refer to V540.”

    Rule V0710. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area

    The inspectors’ words, 359 words

    “IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of one Registered Nurse (RN, Personnel #8) wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during patient care or touching equipment. Findings included: A review of the “Personal Protective Equipment” policy dated 11/12/2012 showed, “Staff must use PPE when performing any procedure/activity where exposure to blood or other potentially infectious body fluids/infectious diseases is anticipated...Fluid resistant gown...are waterproof and protect skin and/or clothing against exposure to biological materials including body fluids...Gloves...routine exam...worn when anticipate hand contact with blood or potentially infectious materials... vascular access procedures...and when handling contaminated items or surfaces.” On 05/05/2025 during observation of care in the Hemodialysis Treatment area, the following was observed: ~ At 10:08 AM, Patient #2 was observed dialyzing at station #8. The Registered Nurse (RN, Personnel #8) was observed at Patient #2’s dialysis machine. Thee RN had his right bare hand resting on the machine, and a pair of gloves in his bare left hand. It was observed that the dialysis machine had an attached keyboard. At 10:10 AM, the RN was asked if he have gloves on when touching the patent’s equipment He replied, “I was entering information. ~ At 10:15 AM, Patient #3 was observed at station #13. The RN (Personnel #8) was observed initiating Patient #3’s dialysis treatment via catheter. The RN did not have a gown on. At 10:17 AM, the RN was asked if he was supposed to have a gown on when initiating a patient’s treatment. The RN said he did not know. On 05/05/2025 at 10:20 AM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said all staff should wear PPE when initiating or terminating a patient’s treatment or touching contaminated equipment.”

    Rule V0115. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Environment - Schematic Diagrams/Labels

    The inspectors’ words, 214 words

    “ENVIRONMENT-SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS/LABELS CFR(s): 494.40(a) 8 Environment: schematic diagrams/labels Water systems should include schematic diagrams that identify components, valves, sample ports, and flow direction. Additionally, piping should be labeled to indicate the contents of the pipe and direction of flow. If water system manufacturers have not done so, users should label major water system components in a manner that not only identifies a device but also describes its function, how performance is verified, and what actions to take in the event performance is not within an acceptable range. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation and interview, the facilty failed to identify all components in the water treatment system in one of one area (Water Treatment area). Findings included: On 05/05/2025, during a tour of the facility, the following was observed: ~ At 9:36 AM, observation showed two tanks sat in front of the multimedia and carbon filtration tanks. The tanks were not labeled to identify the name and the function of the tanks. At the time of the finding, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the tanks wee scavenger tanks. On 05/05/2025 at 9:37 AM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the tanks had been at the facility for about three months. She said the tanks were not labeled.”

    Rule V0187. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 313 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the building to ensure all systems were functional and provided dialysis patients, staff, and the public, a safe and functional environment in one of one area (Lobby). Findings included: A review of the “Disposal of Needles and Sharps” policy dated 11/12/2012 showed, “Staff are responsible to visibly monitor sharps containers to ensure they are not more thatn 3/4 full.” On 05/05/2025 at 8:40 AM, Patient #1 was observed trying to open the main outer door of the building. The patient was observed struggling to hold her walker and open the door. Patient #1 pressed the button that automatically opens the door. It did not work. At 8:45 AM, it was observed that a secondary outer door that led into the facility’s lobby was propped open with a rubber wedge. At 8:45 AM, Patient #1 proceeded through a thrid door that led into the hemodialysis treatment area. The door had a keypad that was not engaged. This allowed unauthorized individuals to enter the treatment area without inspection. On 05/05/2025 at 9:25 AM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the main outer door had been repaired but had stopped working. The Nurse Manager said they were not sure why the secondary door was propped open. Personnel 1 said the door that led into the treatment area does not close properly unless a staff member walks over and pulls it shut. ~ At 10:05 AM, it wa observed that the sharps container at station #12 was more than 3/4 full. On 05/05/2025 at 10:10 AM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the sharps container should have been discarded.”

    Rule V0401. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Pe - Building - Constructed/Maintained To Ensure Safety

    The inspectors’ words, 520 words

    “PE-BUILDING-CONSTRUCT/MAINTAIN FOR SAFETY CFR(s): 494.60(a) The building in which dialysis services are furnished must be constructed and maintained to ensure the safety of the patients, the staff and the public. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the building free from defects and/or hazards in three of three areas (Lobby, Storage/Machine Repair area, Water Treatment area). Findings included: On 05/05/2025, during a tour of the facility the following was observed: ~ At 9:25 AM, rust was observed on the floor in the Lobby underneath the door leading into the hemodialysis treatment area. On 05/05/2025 at 9:25 AM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the door would drag the floor. This left the rusty semi-circle on the tiled floor underneath the door. ~ At 9:30 AM, it was observed that the floor in the Storage/Machine Repair area had not been maintained. The floor was dirty and gritty throughout the area. The floor was covered with stains, tire tracks, and dried tile glue. ~ At 9:40 AM, it was further observed that the floor in the Water Treatment area had not been maintained. The floor was dirty and gritty. throughout the area. There was dirt and debris in the corners of the room. The cement floor underneath and in front of the 2.0 potassium (K+) and 2.5 calcium (Ca) acid tank was discolored black and white. There was a one to two inch tall mound of crystallized acid on the floor underneath the tanks drain spout. The floor had approximately ten feet by two feet of corrosion. The facility’s two water heaters sat atop a circle of rust on the floor. ~ At 9:55 AM, the restroom available for patient use in the Hemodialysis Treatment area had no way for patients to call for help. The pull cord in the restroom did not work. The alarm and the light over the restroom door did not work. ~ At 10:30 AM, it was observed that each dialysis machine had drain hoses that fed into a wall box with a drain. It was observed that the wall boxes behind the dialysis machines at each station (there are 16 hemodialysis stations) had a yellowish substance that sat in the box around the drain. On 05/05/2025 at 10:55 AM, the Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT)/facility Biomed (Personnel #3) the staff never clean the wall boxes. On 05/06/2025 at 8:30 AM, the restroom available for patient use in the Lobby had no way for patients to call for help. The pull cord in the restroom did not work. There was no light over the restroom door. The restroom had not been maintained. The tiled floor was dirty and faded. The restroom had a strong smell of sewage. On 05/06/2025 at 8:35 AM, the Nurse Manager said the restroom had not been maintained. On 05/07/2025 at 8:40 AM, the Senior Biomed (Personnel #6) said the last time he was at the facility was a year ago. The Senior Biomed said he was there to repair dialysis machines. He did not look at the Water Treatment area.”

    Rule V0402. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 397 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain all equipment in three of three areas (Storage/Machine Repair area, Water Treatment area, and Hemodialysis Treatment area). Findings included: On 05/05/2025 during a tour of the facility, the following was observed: ~ At 9:32 AM, hemodialysis machines #207 and #221 were observed in the Machine Repair area. The machines were not labeled to indicate if the machines were ready to use or if they were in disrepair. On 05/05/2025 at 9:35 AM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the machines were from Chicago and had not been put circulation. On 05/05/2025 at 11:10 AM, the Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician/ facility Biomed (Personnel #3) said the dialysis machines were not labeled. ~ At 9:36 AM, water was observed on the floor around two unlabeled tanks in front of the multimedia and carbon filtration tanks. At the time of the findings, the Nurse Manager said the water had been on the floor for a week. They said the they were supposed to report problems to the senior Biomed. On 05/07/2025 at 8:40 AM, the Senior Biomed (Personnel #6) said the water around the tanks was coming from the filter on the back of the reverse osmosis (RO) machine. They said the wrench available to tighten the filter did not fit properly. ~ At 10:25 AM, it was observed that the Automated External Defibrillator (AED) was not maintained. The Nurse Manager opened the AED. The defibrillator pads for the AED expired 06/10/2023. The Nurse Manager opened the AED to test and said they could use their finger to turn the machine on. The Nurse Manager used the tip of an ink pen to turn the machine on. The Nurse Manager attempted to turn the machine on a second time. The machine would not turn on. ~ At 2:00 PM, the treatment chairs at stations #7 and #12 could not be effectively cleaned. The chairs had rips and tears in the armrests. On 05/05/2023 at 2:20 PM, the Nurse Manager said the chairs had tears and could not be effectively cleaned.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of one patient (Patient #1) was in view during the hemodialysis treatment. Findings included: On 05/05/2025 at 10:00 AM, Patient #1 was observed dialyzing at station #1. The patient’s face was not visible. Patient #1’s face was covered with the hood from their jacket. On 05/05/2025 at 10:05 AM, the Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT, Personnel #2) said Patient #1’s face should not be covered. On 05/05/2025 at 10:05 AM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the facility did not have a policy for covered faces during treatment.”

    Rule V0407. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Assessment - Interdisciplinary Team Mbrs/Resp.

    The inspectors’ words, 302 words

    “PA-IDT MEMBERS/RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 494.80 The facility’s interdisciplinary team consists of, at a minimum, the patient or the patient’s designee (if the patient chooses), a registered nurse, a physician treating the patient for ESRD, a social worker, and a dietitian. The interdisciplinary team is responsible for providing each patient with an individualized and comprehensive assessment of his or her needs. The comprehensive assessment must be used to develop the patient’s treatment plan and expectations for care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Nurse (RN) and the attending Physician provided four of four patients (Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8) with an individualized and comprehensive assessment as part of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). Findings included: A review of the “Performance of IDT and Plans of Care” policy dated 01/18/2016 indicated, “The IDT members shall include...a Registered Nurse...a Social Worker...a Registered Dietitian...a Nephrologist...Each patient will receive an evaluation by each member of the IDT.” ~ Patient #5: The medical record did not include documented evidence that the RN and Physician conducted an initial comprehensive assessment of Patient #5 in 08/2024. ~ Patient #6: The medical record did not include documented evidence that the RN and Physician conducted an annual comprehensive reassessment of Patient #6 in 01/2025. ~ Patient #7: The medical record did not include documented evidence that the RN and Physician conducted an annual comprehensive reassessment of Patient #7 in 10/2024. ~ Patient #8: The medical record did not include documented evidence that the RN and Physician conducted an initial comprehensive assessment of Patient #8 in 04/2025. On 05/06/2025 at 3:30 PM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the comprehensive assessment or reassessments for Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8 were not conducted by the RN and Physician.”

    Rule V0501. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Idt Develops Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “POC-IDT DEVELOPS PLAN OF CARE CFR(s): 494.90(a) The interdisciplinary team must develop a plan of care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on record review and interview, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed to develop and implement a complete comprehensive plan of care for four of four patients (Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8). Findings included: ~ Patient #5: The medical record did not include documented evidence that the RN and Physician participated in the development of an initial plan of care for Patient #5 in 08/2024. ~ Patient #6: The medical record did not include documented evidence that the RN and Physician participated in the development of an annual plan of care for Patient #6 in 01/2025. ~ Patient #7: The medical record did not include documented evidence that the RN and Physician participated in the development of an annual plan of care for Patient #7 in 10/2024. ~ Patient #8: The medical record did not include documented evidence that the RN and Physician participated in the development of an initial plan of care for Patient #8 in 04/2025. On 05/06/2025 at 3:30 PM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said thee RN and Physician parts of the plans of care for Patients #5, #6, #7, and #8 were not developed.”

    Rule V0542. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Staff Licensed As Req/Qualified/Demonstrate Competencies

    The inspectors’ words, 296 words

    “PQ-STAFF LIC AS REQ/QUAL/DEMO COMPETENCY CFR(s): 494.140 All dialysis facility staff must meet the applicable scope of practice board and licensure requirements in effect in the State in which they are employed. The dialysis facility’s staff (employee or contractor) must meet the personnel qualifications and demonstrated competencies necessary to serve collectively the comprehensive needs of the patients. The dialysis facility’s staff must have the ability to demonstrate and sustain the skills needed to perform the specific duties of their positions. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff demonstrated the competencies necessary to serve collectively the comprehensive needs of the patients, citing one of one staff (Personnel #3 and #8) who did not have documented evidence that they demonstrated the skill required to be a Biomed or direct patient care staff. Findings included: ~ The training records of the facility Biomed (Personnel #3) did not have documented evidence that they demonstrated the skill to perform preventive maintenance on the dialysis machines and the water treatment system. On 05/07/2025 at 9:30 AM, the Senior Biomed (Personnel #6) said Personnel #3 had been a Biomed at the facility since 2019. The Senior Biomed said they had not performed Personnel #3’s annual biomed training since 2021. ~ The training records of the Registered Nurse (RN, Personnel #8) did not have documented evidence that they demonstrated the competency to provide Hemodialysis care. (The RN was observed providing care during observation of care on 05/05/2025.) On 05/07/2025 at 3:30 PM, the Nurse Manager (Personnel #1) said the RN did not have documented evidence of competencies for hemodialysis at the time of observation of care. They said the RN had worked at the facility “for a couple of months.””

    Rule V0681. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 8, 2025Complaint and standard inspection13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 24, 2013.
  • Run for profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
  • Chain: Other.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 13 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 16 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Other chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Hughes County.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.