Hearth Record

Davita Sapulpa Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma 74131

9647 Ridgeview St, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74131. (918) 224-9996.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 16, 2023: a standard inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 3 of them at condition level, the most serious.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 16, 2023: standard inspection7 deficiencies
  • Cfc - Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “CFC-INFECTION CONTROL CFR(s): 494.30 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all Hepatitis B susceptible patients had monthly Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) testing, citing six of sixty Hepatitis B susceptible patients (Patient #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9). This presented a risk to patient health and safety. Findings included: 1. The facility failed to perform monthly HBsAg testing on six of sixty Hepatitis B susceptible patients (Patient #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9). Cross refer to V 124.”

    Rule V0110. Condition-level.

  • Cfc - Physical Environment

    “CFC-PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a physical environment that was safe and free from defects in two of five areas (water treatment area and hemodialysis treatment area). Findings included: The facility failed to implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment was maintained citing two of five areas (water treatment area and hemodialysis treatment area). Cross refer to v 403.”

    Rule V0400. Condition-level.

  • Cfc - Governance

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “CFC-GOVERNANCE CFR(s): 494.180 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observations, record review, and interview, the Governing Body failed to demonstrate respoonsibility for the opereraation of the facility, health care, and safety of the patients, staff, and public. Findings included: 1. The facility failed to ensure that all Hepatitis B susceptible patients had monthly Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) testing, citing six of sixty Hepatitis B susceptible patients (Patient #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9). This presented a risk to patient health and safety. Cross refer to V 110. 2. The facility failed to provide a physical environment that was safe and free from defects in two of five areas (water treatment area and hemodialysis treatment area). Cross refer to V 400.”

    Rule V0750. Condition-level.

  • Ic - Hbv - Test All Pts, Review Results/Pt Status Known Preadmit

    The inspectors’ words, 433 words

    “IC: HBV: TEST ALL,REV RESULTS/STATUS B4 ADMIT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Routine Testing for Hepatitis B The HBV serological status (i.e. HBsAg, total anti-HBc and anti-HBs) of all patients should be known before admission to the hemodialysis unit. Routinely test all patients [as required by the referenced schedule for routine testing for Hepatitis B Virus]. Promptly review results, and ensure that patients are managed appropriately based on their testing results. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform monthly Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) testing on six of sixty Hepatitis B susceptible patients (Patient #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9). Findings included: A review of the “Hepatitis B Surveillance, Vaccination, Infection Control Measures, and Isolation Guidance” policy revision date 10/2023 included, “All patients will be routinely tested for Hepatitis B virus (HBV)...Results will be reviewed promptly to verify that patients are managed appropriately based on their testing results...Documentation of the following will remain in the patient’s current active medical record...HBV serology results such as Hepatitis B surface antibodies (HBsAb or anti-HBS)...Hepatitis B total core antibody (total anti-HBc or HBcAb) and HBsAg...If HBsAb is less than 10 milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL), consider the patient susceptible...to Hepatitis B infection and monthly HBsAg testing is required.” 1. The facility’s “Vaccinations and Surveillance” report dated 11/15/2023 indicated Patient #4’s HBsAb result on 08/19/2023 was greater than or equal to zero. There was no documented evidence the monthly HBsAg drawn in 09/2023. 2. The facility’s “Vaccinations and Surveillance” report dated 11/15/2023 indicated Patient #5’s HBsAb result on 06/21/2023 was less than three. There was no documented evidence the monthly HBsAg drawn in 08/2023. 3. The facility’s “Vaccinations and Surveillance” report dated 11/15/2023 indicated Patient #6’s HBsAb result on 07/10/2023 was six. There was no documented evidence the monthly HBsAg drawn in 10/2023. 4. The facility’s “Vaccinations and Surveillance” report dated 11/15/2023 indicated Patient #7’s HBsAb result on 06/13/2023 was less than three. There was no documented evidence the monthly HBsAg drawn in 09/2023. 5. The facility’s “Vaccinations and Surveillance” report dated 11/15/2023 indicated Patient #8’s HBsAb result on 06/13/2023 was less than three. There was no documented evidence the monthly HBsAg drawn in 09/2023 and 10/2023. 6. The facility’s “Vaccinations and Surveillance” report dated 11/15/2023 indicated Patient #9’s HBsAb result on 04/04/2023 was less than three. There was no documented evidence the monthly HBsAg drawn from 01/2023 to 09/2023. On 11/16/2023 at 11:20 AM, the Group Facility Administrator (Personnel #1) said the monthly HBsAgs for Patients #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9 were not drawn.”

    Rule V0124. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Building - Constructed/Maintained To Ensure Safety

    The inspectors’ words, 389 words

    “PE-BUILDING-CONSTRUCT/MAINTAIN FOR SAFETY CFR(s): 494.60(a) The building in which dialysis services are furnished must be constructed and maintained to ensure the safety of the patients, the staff and the public. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the building to ensure the safety of the patients and the staff in three of three areas (storage room, water treatment area, and hemodialysis treatment area). Findings included: A review of the “Physical Environment” policy revision date 04/2018 included: “The building in which dialysis services are furnished will be constructed and maintained for the safety of the patients, the teammates, and the public...The dialysis facility will implement and maintain a program to verify that all equipment including...water treatment systems are maintained...systems to assure patient safety will be in place...Access to...water treatment systems, supply storage, and dialysis equipment is restricted to authorized personnel only...Access limitation does not preclude visitors or tours by individual(s) authorized and supervised by facility personnel.” On 11/15/2023, the following was observed: At 1:50 PM, the storage room was not secure. The door to the storage room was propped open. At 2:00 PM, a liquid was observed spilling from underneath the door of the water treatment area into the hallway. The Manager of Clinical Services (MCS, Personnel #2) turned the handle of the door leading into the water treatment area. The security key pad was not engaged. The door opened. Upon entering the water treatment area, it was observed that the liquid was all over the floor inside the water treatment area. The MCS said the staff had cleaned the floor. At 2:20 PM, it was observed in the hemodialysis treatment area that the counter top at the “Dirty Sink” near station #4 was covered with blue pads that had been previously wetted and dried with yellowish-brown stains. The under-counter cabinet was dirty, stained, and had old equipment stored underneath. At the time of the findings, the MCS said the staff should maintaining the area. On 11/15/2023 at the time of the findings the MCS said the door to the storage room should be closed unless deliveries are being made. The MCS said the door to water treatment area should be locked at all times. The MCS said the staff should have removed the excess water.”

    Rule V0402. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 314 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment was maintained citing two of five areas (water treatment area and hemodialysis treatment area). Findings included: A review of the “Physical Environment” policy revision date 04/2018 included: “The dialysis facility will implement and maintain a program to verify that all equipment...are maintained...systems to assure patient safety will be in place.” On 11/15/2023, the following was observed: At 2:00 PM, it was observed in the water treatment area that the lid of the acid mixer was caked and splattered with dried acid concentrate. The Manager of Clinical Services (MCS, Personnel #2) said the staff was responsible for maintaining the water treatment area. At 2:05 PM, it was further observed in the water treatment area that a five gallon bucket of liquid, without a lid, sat in a corner behind the acid mixer. The MCS said bicarbonate was mixed in the bucket to neutralize the acid. Dried acid was observed on the floor around the bucket. At 2:15 PM, it was observed in the hemodialysis treatment area at stations #2, #5, #6, #7, and #12 had vinyl treatment chairs that had rips and tears in the head rest, arm rests, and seats that exposed the inside cushions. This did not allow for effective cleaning and disinfection. At the time of the findings, the Patient Care Technician (PCT, Personnel #9) said the chairs had been in disrepair for awhile. At 2:25 PM, the Group Facility Administrator (GFA, Personnel #1) said she was aware that the chairs were damaged.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

  • Mr - Protect Patient Records From Loss/Keep Confidential

    The inspectors’ words, 267 words

    “MR-PROTECT PT RECORDS FM LOSS/CONFIDENTIAL CFR(s): 494.170(a) The dialysis facility must- (1)Safeguard patient records against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use; and (2) Keep confidential all information contained in the patient’s record, except when release is authorized pursuant to one of the following: (i) The transfer of the patient to another facility. (ii) Certain exceptions provided for in the law. (iii) Provisions allowed under third party payment contracts. (iv) Approval by the patient. (v) Inspection by authorized agents of the Secretary, as required for the administration of the dialysis program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34696 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to safeguard records against unauthorized use and keep confidential all information contained in patients’ records. Findings included: A review of the “Medical Records Custodian and Maintenance” policy revision date 10/2019 included: “The responsibilities of the custodian of the medical records include...verifies that all medical records are stored in a safe manner to protect against...unauthorized use.” On 11/15/2023 at 1:50 PM, 24 storage boxes were observed sitting in an unsecured, open space outside of the receptionist area. The Administrative Assistant (AA, Personnel #5) said the boxes were filled with patient’s records. She said the boxes had been sitting in the open space since 11/13/2023. Personnel #5 said the janitorial service goes to the facility daily. It was observed the medical records room had ample space and a locking mechanism on the door. On 11/15/2023, at the time of the findings, the Manager of Clinical Services (MCS, Personnel #2) said the boxes should have been stored in the medical records room.”

    Rule V0727. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 16, 2023Standard inspection7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 19, 2002.
  • Run for profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 16 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Creek County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Fmcna - Sapulpa Dialysis3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.