Hearth Record

Fmc - Dayton West

A dialysis facility in Trotwood, Ohio 45416

4100 Salem Avenue, Trotwood, Ohio 45416. (937) 279-3120.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 28, 2024: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 28, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area

    The inspectors’ words, 579 words

    “IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36303 Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore eye protection when there was a potential for blood spatter/exposure. This had the potential to affect all the in-center hemodialysis patients. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 02/28/24 at 9:18 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) E administered an intravenous (IV) medication to Patient #2. RN E accessed Patient #2’s dialysis needle tubing, attached medication syringe, unclamped needle tubing, administered the medication, removed the medication syringe, attached a syringe of normal saline (NS), and flushed the line. RN E was wearing a surgical face mask and prescription eyewear. RN E was not wearing eye protection with full side shields or a full-face shield. During an interview on 02/28/24 at 9:21 A.M., RN E confirmed that she was not wearing not wear eye protection with side shields or a face shield when accessing Patient #2’s hemodialysis lines to give a medication. During an interview on 02/28/24 at 9:30 A.M. the Administrator confirmed staff should wear eye protection when accessing a patients hemodialysis lines to administer medications. The Administrator confirmed there was a risk of blood splatter/exposure. 2. During an observation on 02/28/24 at 11:50 Patient Care Technician (PCT) C initiated Patient #5 dialysis treatment. PCT C inserted dialysis needles, connected dialysis tubing, and initiated Patient #5’s dialysis treatment. PCT C’s protective eyewear was resting on top of her head and not covering her eyes. PCT C’s surgical face mask was not covering her nose. 3. During an observation on 02/28/24 at 11:58 PCT C assessed Patient #6’s dialysis access due to a blood observed on the floor below her chair. PCT C removed blood soiled dressing and tape from Patient #6’s, repositioned dialysis needles, cleaned blood from Patient #6’s arm, her chair, and floor. PCT C’s protective eyewear was resting on top of her head and not covering her eyes. PCT C’s surgical face mask was not covering her nose. During an interview on 02/28/24 at 12:10 P.M. PCT C confirmed her protective eyewear was on top of her head and her surgical facemask was below her nose when she initiated Patient #5’s dialysis treatment and when she treated Patient #6’s dialysis access blood leak. PCT C confirmed she was ask risk for blood spatter/exposure during these procedures. Review of the facility’s policy titled “Personal Protective Equipment” dated 11/06/23 revealed personal protective equipment (PPE) including a full-face shield or mask and protective eyewear with full side shield, fluid resistant gowns, and gloves must be worn to protect employees from flood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). PPE is used to protect employees who are occupationally exposed to blood or OPIM when performing procedures which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Protective eyewear is provided by the facility and must be eye protection designed under normal conditions of use to prevent blood and OPIM form reaching the eyes. Prescription corrective eyewear is not considered eye protection.”

    Rule V0115. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments

    The inspectors’ words, 264 words

    “PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36303 Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to patients dialysis access were visible at all times during treatment and were assessed by staff. This affected Patient #4 and had the potential to affect all in-center hemodialysis patients. Findings include: Observation on 02/28/24 at 11:45 A.M. from revealed Patient #4’s dialysis access was not visible. Patient #4 was covered in a blanket and upper extremities were not visible. At 12:06 P.M. Staff C performed a safety check and entered information into Patient #4’s dialysis machine. Staff C did not uncover or assess Patient #4’s dialysis access. Patient #4 remained covered with a blanket and dialysis was not visible. Staff C then moved on to the next dialysis patient. During an interview on 02/28/24 at 12:10 P.M. Staff C confirmed that Patient #4’s dialysis access was not visible. Staff Confirmed she had not assessed Patient #4’s dialysis access when performing the safety check at 12:06 P.M. Staff C confirmed patient’s dialysis access should be visible at all times during treatment. Review of the facility’s policy titled “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” dated 05/01/23 revealed patient safety checks are completed eery 30 minutes. During safety checks staff will ensure connections are secure and visible, ensure access remains uncovered throughout the treatment, observe tape is secure and needles are intact, and there is no bleeding or infiltration noted.”

    Rule V0407. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 28, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Apr 15, 2014.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 18 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (37 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 66% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Montgomery County, 16 have a star rating from CMS: 3 rated 4 of 5, 8 rated 3 of 5, 3 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.