Hearth Record

Center for Dialysis Care, Warrensville

A dialysis facility in Warrensville Heights, Ohio 44128

4877 Galaxy Parkway Suite A, Warrensville Heights, Ohio 44128. (216) 378-5050.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 13, 2023: a complaint inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 13, 2023: complaint inspection7 deficiencies
  • Cfc - Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “CFC-INFECTION CONTROL CFR(s): 494.30 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 29732 Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff removed gloves and wash hands between each patient or station (V113). The facility failed to ensure staff wore face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur, and the facility failed to ensure staff did not drink in the dialysis treatment area (V115). The facility failed to ensure portable equipment was cleaned and disinfected between patients (V116). The facility failed to ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules (V143).”

    Rule V0110. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29732 Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff removed gloves and wash hands between each patient or station for one staff person observed on the treatment floor providing care (Staff N). This could affect all patients receiving services from the facility. The census was 117. Findings include Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Personal Protective Equipment,” effective 12/13/2013, revealed staff were to change gloves after touching a patient or their machine and before arriving to care for another patient or touch another patient’s machine. On 11/13/23 at 6:05 AM Staff N was observed to touch the dialysis machine at station 23, then go to the dialysis machine at station 25, and then return back to the dialysis machine at station 23 without changing her gloves or performing hand hygiene. Interview on 11/13/23 at 6:15 AM with Staff N confirmed this finding. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Substantial Allegation OH00147039.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area

    The inspectors’ words, 558 words

    “IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29732 Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff wore face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur, and the facility failed to ensure staff did not drink in the dialysis treatment area. This could affect all patients receiving services from the facility. The census was 117. Findings include: Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Personal Protective Equipment,” effective 12/13/2013, revealed protective eyewear is defined as goggles or a face shield that provides shielding from top, bottom, and side as well as front of the eyes. Wear protective eyewear whenever splashes, sprays or droplets may come in contact with the eyes. Change gloves after touching a patient or their machine and before arriving to care for another patient or touch another patient’s machine. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Universal Precautions,” effective 12/30/2013, revealed eating and drinking is prohibited in the patient care units and nursing stations. 1. Observations were made on 11/08/23 from 5:27 AM to 7:30 AM. At 5:27 AM Staff J was observed to start the dialysis treatment for the patient in Station 14 without a face shield or goggles on. At 5:29 AM Staff L was observed to start the dialysis treatment for the patient in Station 26 without a face shield or goggles on. At 5:30 AM Staff K was observed to start the dialysis treatment for the patient in Station 24 without a face shield or goggles on. At 5:40 AM Staff I was observed to start the dialysis treatment for the patient in Station 4 without a face shield or goggles on. At 5:45 AM it was observed that when staff saw the State Surveyor, they all put their face shields or goggles on. Interview on 11/08/23 at 6:30 AM with Staff B confirmed the staff were not wearing face shields or goggles when putting patients on the dialysis machine. 2. On 11/08/23 at 11:40 AM Staff N was observed to wear a mask below her nose. Staff N confirmed this in an interview at 11:45 AM. At 11:55 AM Staff N was again observed wearing her mask below her nose. Staff N confirmed this in an interview at 12:05 PM. 3. On 11/08/23 at 5:30 AM three drinks were observed to be at the nurses’ station by a computer. Interview on 11/08/23 at 6:30 AM with Staff B confirmed there were three drinks at the nurses’ station. Interview on 11/13/23 at 8:00 AM with Staff G revealed a walk through was made at this facility in July and coffee and food was found at the nurses’ station at that time. Further interview revealed staff did not wear a face shield or goggles or wear their mask over their nose. The Facility Manager was notified several times. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Substantial Allegation OH00147039.”

    Rule V0115. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Ic - Items Taken To Station Disposed/Dedicated Or Disinfected

    The inspectors’ words, 468 words

    “IC-IF TO STATION=DISP/DEDICATE OR DISINFECT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Items taken into the dialysis station should either be disposed of, dedicated for use only on a single patient, or cleaned and disinfected before being taken to a common clean area or used on another patient. -- Nondisposable items that cannot be cleaned and disinfected (e.g., adhesive tape, cloth covered blood pressure cuffs) should be dedicated for use only on a single patient. -- Unused medications (including multiple dose vials containing diluents) or supplies (syringes, alcohol swabs, etc.) taken to the patient’s station should be used only for that patient and should not be returned to a common clean area or used on other patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29732 Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure items taken into the dialysis station should either be disposed of, dedicated for use only on a single patient, or cleaned and disinfected before being taken to a common clean area or used on another patient. This could affect all patients receiving services from the facility. The census was 117. Findings include: Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Cleaning and Disinfection of External Surfaces and Movable Equipment,” effective 12/30/2013, revealed cleaning and disinfection of any portable equipment (thermometers, stethoscopes) must be performed between patient treatments to prevent cross contamination. On 11/08/23 at 7:07 AM Staff C was observed taking a large blood pressure cuff from station 17, where a patient was receiving treatment, and then use it on the patient in station 7 without cleaning it first. Interview on 11/08/23 at 7:15 AM with Staff C confirmed this finding. On 11/08/23 at 11:50 AM Staff N was observed to use the thermometer on the patient in station 16 and then return it to the clean area without cleaning it. Interview on 11/08/23 at 12:00 PM with Staff N confirmed this finding. On 11/08/23 at 11:56 AM Staff P was observed to use a stethoscope on the patient in station 16 and then on the patient in station 18 without cleaning it between the patients. On 11/08/23 at 12:10 PM Staff B was observed to use a stethoscope on the patient in station 21 and then at 12:25 PM use it on the patient in station 8 without cleaning it between the patients. Interview on 11/08/23 at 12:27 PM with Staff B confirmed this finding. A review of Infection Control audits dated 07/29/23 revealed in eight of eight observations the thermometers and stethoscopes were not disinfected between patients. Interview on 11/08/23 at 1:47 PM with Staff A and Staff F revealed there were no infection control plan of actions currently in place and no follow up plan of action was done from the audit dated 07/29/23. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Substantial Allegation OH00147039.”

    Rule V0116. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29732 Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules. This could affect all patients receiving services from the facility. The census was 117. Findings include: Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Medication Preparation and Administration,” effective 01/22/2014, revealed all medications must be prepared just prior to administration and labeled with the name of the medication, dose, date, and time prepared and initials of who prepared the medication. During observations on 11/08/23 at 6:02 AM three syringes containing Heparin were found to be drawn up with no initials, or date or time when drawn up. A syringe was observed to contain a clear liquid, but was not labeled with the name of the medication, date, time or initials of who drew it up. Interview on 11/08/23 at 6:03 AM with Staff K confirmed these findings.”

    Rule V0143. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments

    The inspectors’ words, 575 words

    “PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29732 Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure patients were in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety for five of five patients observed with covered sites (Patient #5, #7, #8, #9 and #10). This could affect all patients receiving services from this facility. The census was 117. Findings include: Review of the facility’s policy titled, “AV Access Cannulation,” effective 11/13/2012, revealed always keep the access uncovered. When monitoring a patient that refuses to uncover their access, educate the patient on the risks of a covered access at least once during the dialysis treatment and document the education and notify the RN. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Routine Intradialytic Monitoring,” effective 03/17/23, revealed the patient care technician will go to the chair side at least every 30 minutes to monitor the access site is uncovered and secure. Observations were made on 11/08/23 from 7:00 AM to 12:00 PM. 1. At 7:15 AM Patient #7 was observed to have a covered access site. Interview on 11/08/23 at 7:15 AM with Staff I revealed Patient #7 would not keep it uncovered. Review of Patient #7’s medical record and treatment sheet dated 11/08/23 revealed Staff I documented the access was covered and the patient was re-educated; however, no observations were made of Staff I re-educating Patient #7 between 7:00 AM and 12:00 PM. 2. At 7:20 AM Staff I was observed putting oxygen on Patient #8 and then covering the patient and the access site. Interview on 11/08/23 at 7:28 AM with Staff I confirmed this finding. Review of Patient #8’s medical record and treatment sheet dated 11/08/23 revealed Staff I documented at 6:56 AM and 7:26 AM that Patient #8’s access site was visible. 3. At 11:20 AM Patient #9 was observed to have a covered access site. Staff J was observed to answer the machine alarm for Patient #9 and then walk away leaving Patient #9 with a covered site. Review of Patient #9’s medical record and treatment sheet dated 11/08/23 revealed Staff J documented at 11:01 AM and 11:30 AM that the access was visible. 4. At 11:20 AM Patient #5 was observed to have a covered access site. Staff B was observed to talk with Patient #5 and then walk away leaving the access site covered. Review of Patient #5’s medical record and treatment sheet dated 11/08/23 revealed Staff J documented at 10:53 AM and 11:23 AM that the patient’s access site was visible. 5. At 11:40 AM Patient #10 was observed to have a covered site. Staff L looked at the patient and walked away. Review of Patient #10’s medical record and treatment sheet dated 11/08/23 revealed Staff L documented Patient #10 had a covered site and was re-educated; however, no observations were made of Staff L re-educating Patient #10 between 7:00 AM and 12:00 PM. Review of the audits for covered sites dated 09/18/23 revealed five of six patients observed did not have visible access nor was it documented. Four of six patients with covered sites were not re-educated. Interview on 11/08/23 at 2:10 PM with Staff A revealed there was no plan of action documented. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Substantial Allegation OH00147039.”

    Rule V0407. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29732 Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the medical director failed to ensure all policies and procedures relative to patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility for three of eight stations observed with specialty bath containers (station #1, #2 and #8). The census was 117. Findings include: Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Non-Refillable Specialty Bath Cleaning and Storage,” effective 06/26/2019, revealed upon opening a new specialty bath, date, time and initial the container. Do not use if the bath has been opened for >30 days or if the container is opened but not dated or initialed. On 11/08/23 at 12:15 PM dialysate bottles observed at stations 1, 2 and 8 were not labeled with the date and time opened. Interview on 11/08/23 at 12:28 PM with Staff B confirmed this finding.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 13, 2023Complaint inspection7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 23, 1997.
  • Run for profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
  • Chain: Centers for Dialysis Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • 30 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Centers for Dialysis Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, worse than expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, worse than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (36 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 58% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 35 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Cuyahoga County, 31 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 4 of 5, 14 rated 3 of 5, 5 rated 2 of 5, 10 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.