Hearth Record

Usrc Masonic Care Community Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Utica, New York 13501

2150 Bleecker St, Utica, New York 13501. (315) 724-3893.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 1, 2025: a standard inspection.

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 1, 2025: standard inspection8 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 205 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36617 Based on document review, observation, and interview, in 2 of 18 observations, dialysis unit staff did not perform hand hygiene and use gloves as required. This places patients and staff at risk for potential infection. Findings include: -- Review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled “Personal Protective Equipment (PPE),” revised 7/2023, indicated hand hygiene is performed before donning and after doffing PPE. -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 9:55 am, Staff A, Clinical Staff, removed their gloves and gown to get another staff member for patient assistance and did not perform hand hygiene after removing gloves. Staff A acknowledged the finding at the time of observation. -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 10:02 am, Staff B, Clinical Staff, did not remove gloves or perform hand hygeine upon completion of a patient assessment and before walking across the room to clean their stethoscope. -- During interview of Staff C, Clinical Staff, on 7/1/2025 at 12:30 pm, they acknowledged the above findings.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Handling Infectious Waste

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “IC-HANDLING INFECTIOUS WASTE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(i) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing-] (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the- (i) Handling, storage and disposal of potentially infectious waste; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36617 Based on document review, observation, and interview, dialysis unit staff did not handle potentially infectious waste appropriately. Specifically, a regulated medical waste container was not available in close proximity for staff to discard used bloodlines. This could lead to patients and staff being exposed to infectious waste. Findings include: -- Review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled “Guidelines for the Handling and Disposal of Infectious Medical Waste,” revised 4/2023, indicated the biohazard container should be brought to the point of use (e.g., near chairside) to dispose of biohazardous waste. -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 9:40 am, Staff D, Clinical Staff, disconnected used blood lines from the dialysis machine at Station #4 after treatment. Staff D then carried the used bloodlines for approximately 20 feet to dispose of them in a regulated medical waste container located outside Station #2. -- Per observation on 7/1/2025 at 8:30 am, Staff E, Clinical Staff, completed intravenous medication administration at Station #17. Staff E then carried the syringe approximately 20 feet to dispose of the it in a regulated medical waste container by the sink instead of using the regulated medical waste container at the patient’s chairside at Station #17. -- During interview of Staff C Clinical Staff, on 7/1/2025 at 12:30 pm, they acknowledged the above findings.”

    Rule V0121. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds

    The inspectors’ words, 312 words

    “IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36617 Based on document review, observation, and interview, dialysis unit staff did not ensure pre-drawn medications were appropriately labeled and administered per the dialysis unit’s policy and procedure (P&P). This could compromise patient/staff safety. Findings include: -- Review of the dialysis unit’s P&P titled “Guidelines for Administration of Medications,” revised 2/2025, indicated medications should only be administered by the person preparing the medication to avoid error in administration. Any medications that are not immediately administered, should be labeled with the patient’s name, medication name, dose, date, time, and preparer’s initials and will not be stored more than four hours prior to the anticipated administration time. -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 8:40 am, the medication cabinet contained multiple pre-drawn heparin syringes for patients scheduled for dialysis for the next shift at approximately 10:00 am (1 hour and 20 minutes later). The syringes lacked the time they were prepared and the initials of the person who had prepared the medication. -- Per interview of Staff F, Clinical Staff, on 6/30/2025 at 8:55 am, they prepared all intravenous heparin syringes earlier for the patients scheduled that afternoon. Staff F stated they did not document the time or their initials on the syringe labels when the medication was drawn up. -- Per observation of Staff G, Clinical Staff, on 6/30/2025 at 9:35 am, they obtained a syringe of heparin from the medication cabinet for a patient and administered it to a patient. The medication had been drawn up earlier in the day by another clinical staff member. -- During interview of Staff F, Clinical Staff, on 6/30/2025 at 12:45 pm, they acknowledged the above finding.”

    Rule V0143. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care

    The inspectors’ words, 333 words

    “IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36617 Based on document review, observation, and interview, in 1 of 2 observations, dialysis unit staff did not clean the cannulation site of an arterial venous (AV) fistula in accordance with the dialysis unit’s policy and procedure (P&P). This places patients at risk for potential exposure to infections. Findings include: -- Review of the dialysis unit’s P&P titled “Assessment and Cannulation of Arterial Venous (AV) Fistula/Graft and Patient Self Cannulation,” revised 10/2023, stated, “patient must wash access site with soap and water prior to disinfection and cannulation. If unable staff will wash the patient’s access site with soap and water (rinsing and drying afterwards), or with other approved skin cleansing agent or cleaning wipe...” -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 11:20 am, Staff D, Clinical Staff, removed the clear dressing from the patient’s AV fistula cannulation site and wiped off the ointment covering the AV fistula with a gauze pad. Staff D did not cleanse the access site with soap and water or other approved agent, prior to disinfection and cannulation. -- During interview of Staff D on 6/30/2025 at 11:30 am, they acknowledged the above finding.”

    Rule V0147. Standard-level.

  • Environment: Secure And Restricted

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “ENVIRONMENT-SECURE & RESTRICTED CFR(s): 494.40(a) 8 Environment: secure & restricted The water purification and storage system should be located in a secure area that is readily accessible to authorized users. The location should be chosen with a view to minimizing the length and complexity of the distribution system. Access to the purification system should be restricted to those individuals responsible for monitoring and maintenance of the system. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46869 Based on observation and interview, the dialysis unit did not ensure that the water purification and storage area was restricted to only those individuals responsible for monitoring and maintenance of the system. Specifically, the door to the room did not fully self-latch and was at risk of being left open. Findings include: -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 11:00 am, the door between the basement corridor and the facility’s water purification and storage area did not fully self-close and latch to prevent unauthorized entry into the area. -- During interview of Staff H, Biomedical Technician, on 6/30/2025 at 11:00 am, they acknowledged the above findings.”

    Rule V0184. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 218 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46869 Based on observation and interview, the dialysis unit did not ensure that the facility was maintained to provide a safe and functional environment. Specifically, (1) the back door to the dialysis unit treatment area did not fully self-close and latch, which could allow unauthorized access into the unit and (2) the dialysis unit’s soiled workroom was not maintained and clean. Findings related to (1) include: -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 9:30 am, the door between the adjacent nursing home common corridor and the dialysis unit treatment area did not fully self-close and latch to prevent unauthorized entry into the treatment area. -- During interview of Staff H, Biomedical Technician, on 6/30/2025 at 10:45 am, they acknowledged the above findings. Findings related to (2) include: -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 9:40 am, the dialysis unit’s soiled workroom had built-up hard water stains and corrosion on the walls and floors in 5 different areas of the room, including the area around the flush-rim sink. -- During interview of Staff H, on 6/30/2025 at 10:45 am, they acknowledged the above findings.”

    Rule V0401. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 361 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36617 Based on document review, observation, and interview, the dialysis unit did not ensure that all equipment was maintained and operated in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions for use. Specifically, the test strips and control solutions (one to test high levels and one to test low levels) for the blood glucose meter (EvenCare G2 Blood Glucose Monitor) lacked the date they were opened. This could lead to adverse outcomes for patients. Findings include: -- Review of the dialysis unit’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled “Blood Glucose Testing,” revised 2/2023, indicated staff should “follow the manufacture’s guidance for proper storage, expiration and after use by dates of the control solutions and test strips. Document the date new control solution bottles and test strips are opened on each bottle or test strip container. Do not use control solution or test strips past manufacturer expiration date or after use by date.” -- Review of the EvenCare G2 Blood Glucose Monitor manufacturer’s instruction ( information obtained via the internet) indicated, to record the date opened on the test strip bottle label. Discard the bottle and any remaining test strip after 6 months from date of opening. Write down the date when the control solution is first opened. Discard any unused control solution 90 days after first opening or after expiration date. -- Per observation on 7/1/2025 at 9:00 am, Staff I, Clinical Staff, was performing the controls test (test to ensure accuracy of your blood glucose readings) of the EvenCare G2 Blood Glucose Monitor. The test strips and both vials of control solution lacked the date they were opened. There were no manufacturer’s instructions located with the control test kit. Staff I confirmed this finding at the time of observation. -- During interview of Staff J, Clinical Services Director, on 7/1/2025 at 12:30 pm, they acknowledged the above findings and indicated staff should follow the manufacturer’s instructions.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments

    The inspectors’ words, 170 words

    “PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36617 Based on document review, observation and interview, in 1 of 20 observations, dialysis unit staff did not ensure patients access sites were visible during hemodialysis treatment. This could lead to undetected needle dislodgement or line disconnection. Findings include: -- Review of the facilty’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled “Initiation of Dialysis Treatment,” revised 7/2024, indicated prior to walking away from the patient’s dialysis machine, “verify all prescribed orders are followed. Prescription orders and safety measures include, but are not limited to verifying the following: ... Access, bloodline connections, and face are visible ... “ -- Per observation on 6/30/2025 at 8:45 am, the patient receiving dialysis at Station #17, had their central venous catheter access site covered by their shirt. Staff F, Clinical Staff, acknowledged the finding at the time of observation.”

    Rule V0407. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 1, 2025Standard inspection8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 1, 2023.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: US Renal Care, Inc.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 20 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the US Renal Care, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Oneida County, 5 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 3 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.