322507 Silver City Dialysis (Dci)
A dialysis facility in Silver City, New Mexico 88061
1310 Sunset Ln, Silver City, New Mexico 88061. (575) 538-0208.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 16 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 23, 2024: a standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 23, 2024: standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 348 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 28297 Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure patients washed or sanitized hands after holding access sites (A vascular access is created so that blood can be drawn from the body and run through a dialysis machine, where excess fluid and toxins are removed from the blood. (i) The filtered blood then flows back through the access into the body) for one of three survey days. The failure for patients to wash or sanitize hands after holding access site had the potential for cross contamination and could affect 27 in-center patients. Findings include: Observation on 08/21/24 at 10:15 AM revealed Patient (P) 4 at Station 16 applied pressure to the left lower arm access site until bleeding had stopped. When finished the patient walked to the scale to retrieve his/her weight. Certified Hemodialysis Technician (CHT) 1 assisted the patient to the scale to retrieve his/her weight and escorted the patient to the lobby. The patient did not wash or sanitize hands and CHT1 did not instruct or encourage the patient to wash or sanitize hands. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 10:30 AM, CHT1 acknowledged P4 did not wash or sanitize hands after holding access site and he/she did not instruct or encourage the patient to prevent cross contamination. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:45 AM the Charge Nurse stated patients should wash or sanitize hands after holding access sites at the end of treatment to prevent cross contamination of blood borne pathogens. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:55 AM the Nurse Manager confirmed the expectation was for patients to wash or sanitize hands after holding access sites to prevent cross contamination. Review of the facility policy titled, “Post-Dialysis Care of the Fistula/Graft.” Revised December 31, 2019, indicated, “ ...Patients is to remove glove and perform hand hygiene ...””
-
Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu
The inspectors’ words, 441 words
“PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 28297 Based on observations, interview, review of facility policy, and Manufacture Directions for Use, the facility failed to follow the recommendations for dialysis (an artificial means of kidney function that removes the waste and excess fluid from the blood by passing it through a filter) treatments by not maintaining the arterial drip chambers (a pressure and air monitoring component of the dialysis bloodline tubing) fluid levels at 85-95% full for one of three survey days. Failure to follow the Manufacture Directions for Use (DFU) had the potential to result in equipment malfunction and/or failure and negatively impact the safety and wellbeing of the 27 patients receiving dialysis treatments in this facility. Findings include: 1. Observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 08/21/24 revealed the following: At 10:20 AM, the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were less than 25% full at Station 4. At 10:25 AM, the arterial drip chamber fluid level was less than 25 % at Station 9. At 2:10 PM, the arterial drip chamber fluid level was less than 10 % at Station 3, and less than 25% at Station 4 and Station 11. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 2:15 PM the Charge Nurse confirmed the arterial drip chamber fluid level was not at the appropriate level at Stations 3, 4, 9, and 11 and should be at ¾ full to prevent air from getting into the extracorporeal system (dialysis lines and dialyzer). During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:55 AM PM the Nurse Manager confirmed the expectation was for the arterial drip chambers to be 75% to 85% full to prevent air from getting into the extracorporeal system. Review of the facility’s policy “Set-Up, Priming and Treatment Initiation with a Single Use Dialyzer Utilizing Fresenius 2008 K, K2 and T Dialysis Delivery System with Combiset Bloodlines,” indicated, “ ...Fill arterial drip chamber 90% full using level adjust key ...” Review of the manufacture directions for use (DFU) provided by the facility for “Combi Set True Flow Series Hemodialysis Blood Tubing Set with Priming Set and Transducer Protectors,” indicated, “ ...Prime pre-pump, arterial chamber 85-95% full, post pump arterial and venous chamber 65-75% full ...During Treatment Periodically check the extracorporeal circuit for any evidence of possible Separation or leak. Maintain fluid level in pre-pump arterial chamber at 85%-95% full, post pump arterial and venous chambers at 65-75% full ...””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2024 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 8, 1987.
- Run as a non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 16 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Dialysis Clinic, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Grant County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.