Fmc Fairview
A dialysis facility in Fairview, New Jersey 07022
155-161 Bergen Blvd, Fairview, New Jersey 07022. (201) 941-6601.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 19 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 2, 2024: a standard inspection.
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 2, 2024: standard inspection6 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Physical Environment
The inspectors’ words, 272 words
“CFC-PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 49828 Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1) a defect free environment is maintained at all times. (V-401); and 2) “Dummy” drip chambers (DDC’s) are not available for use in the hemodialysis treatment room. “Dummy” drip chambers (DDC) are fluid-filled chambers that are used to bypass the dialysis machine’s air detectors. (V-403) This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), posing serious risk of harm to the patients. Findings include: On 7/31/24 at 10:25 AM an IJ was identified for the facility’s failure to ensure that a DDC was not available for use in the hemodialysis treatment room (V-403). On 7/31/24 at 12:02 PM, the Clinic Manager and Director of Operations were informed of the IJ findings, and a copy of the IJ template was provided. An immediate Removal Plan was requested at that time. On 7/31/24 at 3:09 PM, an acceptable Removal Plan was received, and the facility implemented the following: the Medical Director was informed, a Governing Body meeting was held to execute a Removal Plan for the immediacy of the IJ, and staff re-education. On 8/1/24 at 10:27 AM, the surveyors were able to verify implementation of the Removal Plan through facility tour of the hemodialysis treatment room, facility document review, staff interviews, and review of the staff education documentation. The IJ was removed on 8/1/24 at 10:27 AM and Condition level non-compliance remains. Cross Reference: 494.60 - Physical Environment: Safe/Functional/Comfortable Environment 494.60(b) - Physical Environment: Equipment maintenance - manufacturer’s DFU (Directions for Use)”
-
Ic - Clean/Dirty Areas, Med Prep Area, No Common Med Carts
The inspectors’ words, 271 words
“IC-CLEAN/DIRTY;MED PREP AREA;NO COMMON CARTS CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Clean areas should be clearly designated for the preparation, handling and storage of medications and unused supplies and equipment. Clean areas should be clearly separated from contaminated areas where used supplies and equipment are handled. Do not handle and store medications or clean supplies in the same or an adjacent area to that where used equipment or blood samples are handled. When multiple dose medication vials are used (including vials containing diluents), prepare individual patient doses in a clean (centralized) area away from dialysis stations and deliver separately to each patient. Do not carry multiple dose medication vials from station to station. Do not use common medication carts to deliver medications to patients. If trays are used to deliver medications to individual patients, they must be cleaned between patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39228 3. On 7/31/24 at 11:33 AM, during a tour of the treatment floor, a pair of blue gloves, the type that are worn by staff members for patient care on the dialysis unit, were laying on a countertop area located between a designated clean handwashing sink and the patient scale. The gloves appeared to have been used and were turned inside out. There was no waste receptacle readily accessible in the area of the sink. At 11:34 AM, an interview was conducted with S2, the Charge Nurse, who confirmed that the gloves were dirty and stated, “We had a trash can here, but it has been gone for a couple of weeks and I’ll have to ask our cleaning company what happened to it.” N.J.A.C 8:43A-24.8(b)”
-
Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu
The inspectors’ words, 256 words
“PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49828 Based on one of one observation of a “Dummy” drip chamber (DDC) on the treatment floor, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that DDCs are not available for use on the hemodialysis treatment floor. “Dummy” drip chambers (DDC) are fluid-filled chambers that are used to bypass the dialysis machine’s air detectors. The presence of a DDC in the hemodialysis treatment room is considered an immediate and serious threat to patient health and safety. Findings include: On 7/31/24 at 10:25 AM, during tour of the hemodialysis treatment floor, a DDC that contained a clear solution was present in the top right drawer of Clean Sink 19. During an interview at 11:02 AM, the Biomedical Technicians, Staff (S) 3, and S4, stated they were unsure why the DDC was present on the floor, that the staff does not use DDCs, and that it should not be present on the treatment floor. S3 further stated, “the DDCs are used only in the water room to test the dialysis machines”. Review of facility policy titled, “Use of “Dummy” Drip Chambers,” revised 3/28/18, stated “... Security of Dummy Drip Chambers: DDCs may never be stored in the dialysis treatment area ...””
-
Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx
The inspectors’ words, 359 words
“PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49828 Based on review of one of three medical records (Patient (P) 5), staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff followed the physician’s hemodialysis prescription orders for the dialysis machine temperature in six of nine hemodialysis treatments reviewed. Findings include: On 8/1/24, a review of P5’s medical record revealed the following: The “Current Orders” portion of the “Patient transfer” section of the medical record stated the hemodialysis prescription: “In Ctr HD [In-center hemodialysis], MonWedFri [Monday, Wednesday, Friday], 3 hrs [hours] and 30 min [minutes] ... Machine Temp [temperature]: 37 [Celsius]...”. A review of hemodialysis treatment sheets from 7/8/24 to 7/26/24 indicated that the prescribed temperature of 37 degrees Celsius (C) was not administered in accordance with the physician order above on the following treatment dates: On 7/8/24, the machine temp was documented as 36 C. On 7/17/24, the machine temp was documented as 36 C. On 7/19/24, the machine temp was documented as 36 C. On 7/22/24, the machine temp was documented as 36 C. On 7/24/24, the machine temp was documented as 36.5 C. On 7/26/24, the machine temp was documented as 36.5 C. On 8/2/14 at 9:58 AM, Staff (S) 2, Charge Nurse, stated, “The patient complains of being too hot and the staff adjusts the temperature to keep the patient comfortable.” S2 continued, “The staff should follow the machine temperature that is ordered.” S2 confirmed that if there is a variation between the order and delivered treatment, the physician should be made aware. The medical record did not contain documented evidence that the physician was aware of the changes in temperatures on the above dates. Review of facility policy titled, “Physician Order Documentation,” revised 7/3/23, stated the following: “ ... General Policy: Nurses practice acts requires nurses to carry out treatment care, medication administration, lab tests, procedures, and other treatments, based on physician orders ...”. N.J.A.C. 8:43A-24.6(d)(4)”
-
Patient/Family Education & Training
The inspectors’ words, 318 words
“POC-PT/FAMILY EDUCATION & TRAINING CFR(s): 494.90(d) The patient care plan must include, as applicable, education and training for patients and family members or caregivers or both, in aspects of the dialysis experience, dialysis management, infection prevention and personal care, home dialysis and self-care, quality of life, rehabilitation, transplantation, and the benefits and risks of various vascular access types. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39228 Based on review of one of two medical records for a newly admitted patient, (Patient (P) 7), staff interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that education and training for a newly admitted patient are provided within a specified time frame in accordance with the facility’s policy and procedure. Findings include: On 8/2/24, a review of P7’s medical record revealed the following: P7 was admitted to the facility on 5/23/24 for in-center hemodialysis. The patient’s plan of care (POC) was dated 6/24/24. The POC stated that the patient had a CVC (central venous catheter) and a maturing AV (arteriovenous) fistula. P7’s medical record did not contain documentation that he/she was educated within the first month of admission on fire/emergency evacuation and take off procedures. On 8/3/24 at 10:42 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff (S) 1, the Clinic Manager. S1 stated that P7’s education on fire/emergency evacuation and take off procedures had not been completed per the facility’s policy. Review of facility policy and procedure titled, “Patient Education,” published 2/6/23, stated, “... Policy Refer to the information below on the education topics and time frame specific to a new patient admission. Topic ...Fire/Emergency Evacuation and Take Off Procedures ... Time Frame ... Within the 1st month for new patients ... Document Patient Education, Patient Education must be documented in the patient’s medical record. This may occur through the use of: Patient education assessment, Other interdisciplinary specific assessments, Clinical/progress notes ...” N.J.A.C. 8.43A-24.14(a)(3)(iv)”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 265 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49828 3. On 7/21/24 at 10:10 AM, two medication storage cabinets located above the clean sink area across from Station 1 were unlocked and easily opened. Affixed to each medication storage cabinet was a number combination lock which was not utilized to prevent the storage cabinets from opening. Inspection of the two unlocked cabinets revealed the following contents: Cabinet 1, labeled “IV Medications” (Intravenous medications), contained the following IV medications: Heparin Sodium, Doxercalciferol, Venofer, and Cryodose Anesthetic Spray. Cabinet 2, labeled “Oral Medications,” contained the following oral medications: Cinacalcet, Clonidine, Tamiflu, Midodrine Hydrochloride, Loperamide, and Glucose 15 gel. During an interview at 10:15 AM, Staff (S) 2, the Charge Nurse, stated, “Yes, they [the medication cabinets] must be locked at all times. We use a lock number combination.” S2 stated, “I don’t know why it [the medication storage cabinets] was left unlocked, these are usually locked at all times.” S2 then locked medication storage Cabinet 1 and Cabinet 2 using the number combination lock affixed to each cabinet doors. Review of facility policy titled, “Medication Preparation and Administration,” revised 2/6/23, stated the following: “... Securement: The following steps must be taken for the securement: All medications will be kept in a locked cabinet except when in use...”. N.J.A.C. 8:43A-9.5(a)”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2024 | Standard inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Nov 30, 2009.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 19 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (30 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 72% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 16 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Bergen County, 15 have a star rating from CMS: 9 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.