Hearth Record

Dialysis Clinic, Inc.

A dialysis facility in Bellevue, Nebraska 68123

4112 Twin Creek Dr, Bellevue, Nebraska 68123. (402) 934-9560.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 10, 2024: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 10, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Dialysis Emergency Equipment

    The inspectors’ words, 538 words

    “Dialysis Emergency Equipment CFR(s): §494.62(b)(9) Condition for Coverage: [(b) Policies and procedures. The dialysis facility must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (9) A process by which the staff can confirm that emergency equipment, including, but not limited to, oxygen, airways, suction, defibrillator or automated external defibrillator, artificial resuscitator, and emergency drugs, are on the premises at all times and immediately available. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48995 Based on review of facility policies, procedures, and checklists, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to identify and remove expired emergency medications/supplies from the Emergency Code cart (where emergency medications and supplies are stored) and the Emergency Preparedness tub (a kit containing emergency evacuation medications/supplies, including site dressings, saline, IV tubing, available to accommodate evacuated hemodialysis patients). This failed practice had the potential to expose all 46 patients on census to expired supplies/medications during an emergency. Findings are: A. Review of the policy and procedure titled Expiration Dates of Meds and Supplies, dated 12/2010, revealed expiration dates will be either the manufacturer’s expiration date or the number of days after opening, whichever is first. B. Observation of the facility Emergency Code cart, on 1/3/24 at 3:10 PM, revealed the following expired medications/supplies: 1. 6- 1 milligram (mg)/milliliter (mL) Epinephrine (a medication used to restore cardiac rhythm during a cardiac emergency) injectable vials with an expiration date of 12/2023. 2. 1- 1 mg/10 mL Epinephrine injectable vial with an expiration date of 1/1/24. 3. 3- 20 mL syringes (unopened) with an expiration date of 5/12/23. C. Review of the facility checklist, titled Monthly Emergency Code Cart Checklist, revealed the checklist failed to include the 20 mL disposable syringes, and the 1 mg/mL and 1 mg/10 mL Epinephrine injectable vials for expiration date review. D. During staff interview on 1/3/24 at 3:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the medications/supplies listed above, for the Emergency Code cart, were outdated and in need of replacement and confirmed the Emergency Code cart checklist did not include all supplies and medications requiring review for expiration dates. E. Observation of the facility Emergency Preparedness tub, on 1/8/24 at 8:25 AM, revealed the following expired supplies: 1. 1- unopened box of nitrile exam gloves with an expiration date of 9/25/23. 2. 1- unopened box of nitrile exam gloves with an expiration date of 3/15/23. 3. 1- unopened box of nitrile exam gloves with an expiration date of 5/17/23. F. Review of the facility checklist, titled Monthly Emergency Preparedness Tub Supply List, revealed the checklist failed to include the nitrile exam gloves for expiration date review. G. During staff interview on 1/8/24 at 02:20 PM, the DON confirmed the supplies listed above, located in the Emergency Preparedness tub, were outdated and in need of replacement and confirmed the Monthly Emergency Preparedness Tub Supply List failed to include the nitrile exam gloves for expiration date review.”

    Rule E0028. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care

    The inspectors’ words, 353 words

    “IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48995 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to document the provision of Central Venous Catheter (CVC-an indwelling device surgically placed into a large vein most commonly the internal jugular, subclavian, or femoral for venous access for the provision of hemodialysis) care and dressing changes for 1 of 2 patients (Patient 9) with a CVC. Total patient sample was 5 and facility census was 46. This failed practice provided the opportunity to expose Patient 9’s bloodstream to infectious pathogens. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Hemodialysis (HD) Vascular Access Catheter Disinfection, Exit Site Care, and Dressing Change, dated 11/2023, revealed CVC access site care and dressing changes are to be to be performed and documented in the patient’s HD record by a nurse at every HD treatment. B. Review of Patient 9’s HD record, on 1/4/24 at 9:30 AM, revealed no documentation of the patient’s CVC care and dressing changes for HD treatments dated 12/15/23 and 12/24/23. C. During staff interview on 1/4/24 at 4:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Patient 9’s HD records dated 12/15/23 and 12/24/23, did not contain documentation for the provision of CVC care and dressing changes.”

    Rule V0147. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 275 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to identify and remove expired Hemastix reagent (HR) strips (testing strips, used to assess for potential blood leaks in hemodialysis (HD) machines when the HD machine blood leak alarm sounds). Expired HR strips have the potential for reduced blood detection sensitivity. This failed practice of utilizing expired HR strips had the potential to expose all 46 patients on census to undetected blood leaks during HD treatments. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Management of a Blood Leak Utilizing Hemastix Reagent Strip, dated 12/2019, revealed HR strips are to be used to assess if a blood leak is suspected when the HD machine blood leak alarm sounds. The facility policy and procedure failed to ensure expired HR test strips were not available for use, or used, by staff. B. Observation of the patient HD treatment area on 1/3/24 at 3:45 PM, revealed a bottle of HR strips with an expiration date of 2/28/23. C. During staff interview on 1/3/24 at 3:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the HR strips located in the patient HD treatment area were expired and confirmed the HR strips are used by staff to assess for potential blood leaks in HD machines when the HD machine blood leak alarm sounds.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

  • Rights Posted With State/Nw Contact #S And Addresses

    The inspectors’ words, 273 words

    “PR-RIGHTS POSTED,STATE/NW ONTACT INFO CFR(s): 494.70(c) The dialysis facility must prominently display a copy of the patient’s rights in the facility, including the current State agency and ESRD network mailing addresses and telephone complaint numbers, where it can be easily seen and read by patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post the telephone complaint numbers for the End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Network (an external organization with which dialysis patients may file grievances and complaints anonymously) and the state survey agency with the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities poster. This failed practice had the potential to prevent all 46 patients on census from filing an anonymous complaint with the ESRD Network or the state survey agency. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policies and procedures titled Patient Rights & Responsibilities - Complaints and Grievances related to Health Care, Discrimination and Privacy, dated 10/1/22, and Dialysis Clinic Inc. (DCI) Patient Rights and Responsibilities, Rules and Regulations, dated 1/2021, revealed patients have the right to be informed of external grievance mechanisms and processes including how to contact the ESRD Network and the state survey agency. B. Observation of the facility’s patient lobby, on 1/3/24 at 9:00 AM, revealed the Patient Rights and Responsibilities poster did not include the ESRD Network or the state survey agency telephone complaint number. C. During staff interview on 1/3/24 at 4:15 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the Patient Rights and Responsibilities poster failed to include the telephone complaint numbers for the ESRD Network and the state survey agency.”

    Rule V0470. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 10, 2024Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 16, 2004.
  • Run as a non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 12 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Dialysis Clinic, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, worse than expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, worse than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Sarpy County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Davita Cornhusker Dialysis2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.