Davita Hastings Dialysis Center
A dialysis facility in Hastings, Nebraska 68901
1900 N St Joseph Ave, Hastings, Nebraska 68901. (402) 463-4893.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 12 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 7, 2024: a standard inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 7, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Medical Records
“CFC-MEDICAL RECORDS CFR(s): 494.170 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 47269 V727 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure the room where 17 boxes of patient medical records were stored prior to shipment to an offsite storage facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect the privacy and confidentiality of past and current dialysis patients by not safeguarding patient medical records against unauthorized use. Census was 42 (30 in-center hemodialysis patients and 12 home peritoneal dialysis patients).”
-
Pe - Building - Constructed/Maintained To Ensure Safety
The inspectors’ words, 389 words
“PE-BUILDING-CONSTRUCT/MAINTAIN FOR SAFETY CFR(s): 494.60(a) The building in which dialysis services are furnished must be constructed and maintained to ensure the safety of the patients, the staff and the public. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48995 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain intact surface integrity of walls, floors, and equipment in the Water Room (a dedicated, secure room housing the facility water treatment system that has been fitted to provide source water, drains, and electric power needed to support the dialysis system) and Dialysate (a mixture of source water and chemicals used to clean hemodialysis (HD) patient’s blood during dialysis) Preparation Room. This failed practice did not allow for effective cleaning and disinfecting of the walls, floors, and equipment, which had the potential to expose all 30 in-center HD patients on census to microbial pathogens. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Physical Environment, dated April 2018, revealed the building in which dialysis services are furnished will be constructed and maintained for the safety of the patients, the teammates, and the public. B. During observation of the facility environment with the Charge Nurse (CN) on 3/4/24 at 11:15 AM, the following areas were identified and confirmed in need of repair, cleaning, and/or replacement: Water Room 1. The painted walls presented with gouges, chipped paint, and stains throughout. 2. The pipes were coated in a greenish residue throughout. 3. The electrical outlet adjacent to the acid mixing tank was covered in a rust-colored residue. 4. The metal floor drain covers presented with flaking and peeling paint throughout. 5. The floor presented with dirt and debris throughout. Dialysate Preparation Room 1. The utility cart located on the north wall presented with chipped paint and rust colored residue throughout. 2. The built in shelves located on the east wall presented with dirt and debris with rust colored residue to the metal supports throughout. 3. The floor presented with dirt and debris throughout. C. During staff interview on 3/7/24 at 9:45 AM, the Interim Facility Administrator (FA) confirmed the facility failed to maintain intact surface integrity of walls, floors, and equipment in the Water Room and Dialysate Preparation Room. The Interim FA also confirmed the areas identified were in need of repair, cleaning, and/or replacement.”
-
Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu
The inspectors’ words, 494 words
“PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48995 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the Reverse Osmosis (RO) machine (the primary method for purifying water for Hemodialysis (HD) treatments) in the Water Room (a dedicated, secure room housing the facility water treatment system that has been fitted to provide source water, drains, and electric power needed to support the dialysis system) to prevent leaks and corrosion of the RO outer metal covering. The facility also failed to maintain the B. Braun HD machines to prevent corrosion of the shelf which holds Peracetic acid (an organic peroxide based, colorless liquid with a low pH, used for disinfecting the HD machines) bottles, located on the back of the HD machines. This was found on all 14 HD machines in the facility, (12 located on the treatment floor and 2 in the Bio Med Room). This failed practice prevented the clean, safe, and functional working condition of the equipment. This had the potential to affect the facilities ability to provide uninterrupted HD treatments to all 30 in-center HD patients on census. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Physical Environment, dated April 2018, revealed the facility will implement and maintain a program to verify that all equipment is maintained and operated in accordance with manufactures recommendations. B. Observation of the facility Water Room, on 3/4/24 at 11:15 AM, revealed the RO machine had clear liquid draining from the back left bottom corner, into a nearby drain, and the RO’s bottom right metal panel had rust colored debris and corrosion noted. C. Observation of the B. Braun HD machines, on 3/6/24 at 9:00 AM, revealed the shelf, which holds the Peracetic acid bottles were located on the back of the HD machine, had rust colored areas throughout the shelf. D. During staff interview, on 3/5/24 at 9:30 AM, the facility BioMed Technician (BMT), confirmed the RO machine had been leaking for a couple of months, due to a problem with the membrane housing of the RO system and that the facility leadership was in discussions to either repair or replace the faulty part. The facility BMT further confirmed the prescence of rust-colored debris and the corrosion of the right bottom area of the RO machine, which needs repair and/or replacement. E. During staff interview, on 3/7/24 at 9:45 AM, the Interim Facility Administrator (FA), confirmed the the RO machine and the 14 HD machine shelves were in need of repairs and/or cleaning and confirmed the clean, safe, and functional working condition of the RO machine and the B. Braun HD machines is the responsibility of the Bio Med department and staff.”
-
Mr - Protect Patient Records From Loss/Keep Confidential
The inspectors’ words, 363 words
“MR-PROTECT PT RECORDS FM LOSS/CONFIDENTIAL CFR(s): 494.170(a) The dialysis facility must- (1)Safeguard patient records against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use; and (2) Keep confidential all information contained in the patient’s record, except when release is authorized pursuant to one of the following: (i) The transfer of the patient to another facility. (ii) Certain exceptions provided for in the law. (iii) Provisions allowed under third party payment contracts. (iv) Approval by the patient. (v) Inspection by authorized agents of the Secretary, as required for the administration of the dialysis program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure the room where 17 boxes of patient medical records were stored prior to shipment to an offsite storage facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect the privacy and confidentiality of past and current dialysis patients by not safeguarding patient medical records against unauthorized use. Census was 42 (30 in-center hemodialysis patients and 12 home peritoneal dialysis patients). A. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medical Records Custodian (MRC) and Maintenance, dated 10/2019, revealed the MRC is responsible for safeguarding the privacy and confidentiality of patient medical records against unauthorized use. B. During observation of the open, unsecured east office with the facility Administrative Assistant (AA), on 3/4/24 at 3:00 PM, 17 boxes labeled Iron Mountain were identified. C. During staff interview on 3/4/24 at 3:15 PM, the facility AA explained the 17 boxes labeled Iron Mountain contained past and current dialysis patient records designated for shipment to an offsite storage facility and the facility AA had not locked the east office as they were uncertain which facility key locked the door. The facility AA confirmed they are the designated facility MRC. D. During staff interview, on 3/4/24 at 4:30 PM, the Interim Facility Administrator (FA) confirmed it is the expectation of the MRC to safeguard the privacy and confidentiality of patient medical records against unauthorized use. The Interim FA further confirmed it is the expectation that patient medical records are stored in a secured room accessible to the MRC and the Interim FA only.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2024 | Standard inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 2, 1989.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 12 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Adams County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.