Hearth Record

Aurora Dialysis LLC

A dialysis facility in Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201

1451 44th Ave S, Suite 104d, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201. (701) 757-5700.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 19, 2024: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 19, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Patient Assessment - Interdisciplinary Team Mbrs/Resp.

    The inspectors’ words, 565 words

    “PA-IDT MEMBERS/RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 494.80 The facility’s interdisciplinary team consists of, at a minimum, the patient or the patient’s designee (if the patient chooses), a registered nurse, a physician treating the patient for ESRD, a social worker, and a dietitian. The interdisciplinary team is responsible for providing each patient with an individualized and comprehensive assessment of his or her needs. The comprehensive assessment must be used to develop the patient’s treatment plan and expectations for care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19410 Based on policy review, document review, record review, and patient and staff interview, the ESRD (end stage renal disease) facility failed to include 1 of 4 required members on the interdisciplinary team (licensed dietitian). Failure to have a licensed dietitian as part of the interdisciplinary team limited the facility’s ability to provide individualized and comprehensive assessments of the patients’ nutritional needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, “Multidisciplinary Re-Assessment,” dated March 2024, stated, “PURPOSE: To assure appropriate care based on the nature of the patient’s illness, the treatment prescribed and an ongoing assessment of the patient’s needs. . . . POLICY STATEMENTS: 1. The Multidisciplinary Re-assessment is individualized for each patient. It will address the psychosocial, dietary, medical and functional needs of the patient. 2. The Multidisciplinary Re-assessment is developed by a multi-disciplinary team including, but not limited to the attending physician, clinical manager an/or nursing designees, dietitian and social worker. . . . 5. The re-assessment for patients whose medical condition is stabilized is reviewed yearly. 6. The Multidisciplinary initial assessment will be completed within thirty (30) [days] of admission. . . .” Review of the facility’s current list of personnel occurred on 03/18/24. This list failed to include a licensed dietitian. Interviews with patients on March 18-19, 2024, identified the following: 03/18/24 at 2:12 p.m., Patient A stated he does not see a dietitian about his diet and the nurse, or the physician will give him the lab results. 03/18/24 at 2:20 p.m., Patient B stated the facility does not have a dietitian and the nurse talks to him about his labs and diet. 03/18/24 at 2:30 p.m., Patient C stated, “They don’t have a dietitian.” The patient stated she does not have any fluid restrictions and the nurse talks to her about her diet. 03/19/24 at 7:42 a.m., Patient D stated, “There is no dietitian here,” and the nurse will go over lab results each month. 03/19/23 at 7:48 a.m., Patient E stated “There was a dietitian when I first started on dialysis, but they don’t have one now.” - Review of patient medical records occurred on March 18-19, 2024. Review of the comprehensive assessments identified the following: Patient #1 - Annual Interdisciplinary Re-Assessment, dated 01/02/24 - Nutritional assessment lacked completion by a licensed dietitian. Patient #2 - Annual Interdisciplinary Re-Assessment, dated 01/03/24 - Nutritional assessment lacked completion by a licensed dietitian. Patient #3 - Initial Interdisciplinary Assessment, dated 12/13/24 - Nutritional assessment lacked completion by a licensed dietitian. Patient #4 - Annual Interdisciplinary Re-Assessment, dated 01/04/24 - Nutritional assessment lacked completion by a licensed dietitian. During interview on the morning of 03/19/24, an administrative staff member (#1) stated the facility has not had a dietitian on staff for “over six months,” and they have not been successful in hiring a new dietitian. The staff member (#1) stated the nursing staff provide dietary services to the patients.”

    Rule V0501. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rd - Nutritional Status

    The inspectors’ words, 382 words

    “PA-RD-NUTRITIONAL STATUS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(6) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (6) Evaluation of nutritional status by a dietitian This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19410 Based on record review, policy review, document review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each patients’ comprehensive assessment included an evaluation of nutritional status by a registered dietitian for 4 of 4 patient initial and re-assessments reviewed (Patients #1, #2, #3, and #4). Failure to have a licensed dietitian on staff limited the facility’s ability to evaluate and meet the patients’ nutritional needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, “Multidisciplinary Re-Assessment,” dated March 2024, stated, “PURPOSE: To assure appropriate care based on the nature of the patient’s illness, the treatment prescribed and an ongoing assessment of the patient’s needs. . . . POLICY STATEMENTS: 1. The Multidisciplinary Re-assessment is individualized for each patient. It will address the psychosocial, dietary, medical and functional needs of the patient. 2. The Multidisciplinary Re-assessment is developed by a multi-disciplinary team including, but not limited to the attending physician, clinical manager an/or nursing designees, dietitian and social worker. . . . 5. The re-assessment for patients whose medical condition is stabilized is reviewed yearly. 6. The Multidisciplinary initial assessment will be completed within thirty (30) [days] of admission. . . .” Review of the facility’s current list of personnel occurred on 03/18/24. This list failed to include a licensed dietitian. - Review of patient medical records occurred on March 18-19, 2024. Review of the comprehensive assessments identified the following: Patient #1 - Annual Interdisciplinary Re-Assessment, dated 01/02/24 - Nutritional assessment lacked completion by a licensed dietitian. Patient #2 - Annual Interdisciplinary Re-Assessment, dated 01/03/24 - Nutritional assessment lacked completion by a licensed dietitian. Patient #3 - Initial Interdisciplinary Assessment, dated 12/23/23 - Nutritional assessment lacked completion by a licensed dietitian. Patient #4 - Annual Interdisciplinary Re-Assessment, dated 01/04/24 - Nutritional assessment lacked completion by a licensed dietitian. During interview on the morning of 03/19/24, an administrative staff member (#1) stated the facility has not had a dietitian on staff for over six months and they have not been successful in hiring a new dietitian. The staff member (#1) stated she and the nursing staff provide dietary services to the patients.”

    Rule V0509. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn, Msw, & Rd Available To Meet Patient Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “GOV-RN, MSW, & RD AVAIL TO MEET PT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.180(b)(1) The governing body or designated person responsible must ensure that- The registered nurse, social worker and dietitian members of the interdisciplinary team are available to meet patient clinical needs; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19410 Based on record review, policy review, document review, and patient and staff interview, the governing body or designated responsible person failed to ensure 1 of 4 required members of the multidisciplinary team (licensed dietitian) was available to meet the patients’ clinical needs. Failure to have a licensed dietitian on staff limited the facility’s ability to meet the patients’ nutritional needs. Findings include: Review of the facility’s current list of personnel occurred on 03/18/24. This list failed to include a licensed dietitian. During an interview the morning of 03/19/24, an administrative staff member (#1) stated the facility has not had a dietitian on staff for “over six months.” Refer to V501 and V509.”

    Rule V0758. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 19, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Apr 22, 2008.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 18 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, worse than expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Grand Forks County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.