Hearth Record

Sanford Tom and Frances Leach Bismarck Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Bismarck, North Dakota 58501

209 N 7th St, Bismarck, North Dakota 58501. (701) 323-2800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 18, 2024: a standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 18, 2024: standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Bacteriology Of Water-Maximum And Action Levels

    The inspectors’ words, 423 words

    “BACT OF H20-MAXIMUM & ACTION LEVELS CFR(s): 494.40(a) 4.1.2 Bacteriology of water: max & action levels Product water used to prepare dialysate or concentrates from powder at a dialysis facility, or to process dialyzers for reuse, shall contain a total viable microbial count lower than 200 CFU/mL and an endotoxin concentration lower than 2 EU/mL The action level for the total viable microbial count in the product water shall be 50 CFU/mL, and the action level for the endotoxin concentration shall be 1 EU/mL. If those action levels are observed in the product water, corrective measures shall promptly be taken to reduce the levels. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20497 Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to repeat culture testing for 1 of 4 months (November) in 2024 when the product water culture exceeded allowable levels. Failure to repeat culture testing when reaching the action level limited the facility’s ability to ensure safe product water for use in dialysis treatments. Findings include: Review of the policy “Water System Testing - Dialysis Enterprise” occurred on 12/17/24. This policy, dated 03/07/24, stated, “. . . Testing for Bacterial Contamination of the Water System 1. Allowable levels: Compoment [sic] . . . Total viable bacteria count . . . Action Level . . . 50 CFU/ml [colony forming units per milliliter] . . . 5. Assessment of Results: Utilize the algorithm to assess the results of the testing. . . .” The undated algorithm stated, “Review dialysate and water culture results > Results 50-199 CFU/ml > Notify Manager > Review culture and disinfection logs > disinfect machine or water system > Redraw sample . . .” Review of 2024 water system culture records occurred on 12/17/24. The 11/06/24 report for Pre Loop 2 TP11, collected 11/04/24, stated, “. . . Culture Result 50 cfu/ml Action limit reached - action required . . .” Review of the 2024 culture tracking records occurred on 12/17/24. The 11/04/24 record showed an entry of <50 cfu/ml for Pre Loop 2 (TP11). The facility failed to accurately document the culture result for Pre Loop 2 (TP11) in November 2024. Upon request on 12/17/24, the facility failed to provide evidence of redrawing a sample for a follow up culture of Pre Loop 2 (TP11). During interview on 12/17/24 at 4:10 p.m., an administrative staff member (#1) confirmed the facility failed to recognize the action limit was reached for Pre Loop 2 (TP11) in November 2024 and failed to re-culture Pre Loop 2 (TP11).”

    Rule V0178. Standard-level.

  • Carbon Adsorption - Monitoring, Testing Frequency

    The inspectors’ words, 386 words

    “CARBON ADSORP-MONITOR, TEST FREQUENCY CFR(s): 494.40(a) 6.2.5 Carbon adsorption: monitoring, testing freq Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be performed at the beginning of each treatment day prior to patients initiating treatment and again prior to the beginning of each patient shift. If there are no set patient shifts, testing should be performed approximately every 4 hours. Results of monitoring of free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be recorded in a log sheet. Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine can be accomplished using the N.N-diethyl-p-phenylene-diamine (DPD) based test kits or dip-and-read test strips. On-line monitors can be used to measure chloramine concentrations. Whichever test system is used, it must have sufficient sensitivity and specificity to resolve the maximum levels described in [AAMI] 4.1.1 (Table 1) [which is a maximum level of 0.1 mg/L]. Samples should be drawn when the system has been operating for at least 15 minutes. The analysis should be performed on-site, since chloramine levels will decrease if the sample is not assayed promptly. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20497 Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to test the dialysis treatment water for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine at least every four hours each patient treatment day for 1 of 26 treatment days (11/04/24) reviewed in November 2024. Failure to test for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine every four hours each day of patient treatments limited the facility’s ability to ensure safe dialysis treatment water. Findings include: Review of the policy “Water Testing Chlorine - Dialysis Enterprise” occurred on 12/17/24. This policy, dated 12/14/21, stated, “. . . Policy: . . . Total chlorine is checked before each patient shift or minimum of every four hours. . . .” Reviewed on 12/17/24, the November 2024 chlorine testing record showed the facility tested for chlorine on 11/04/24 at 1105 (11:05 a.m.) and next at 1640 (4:40 p.m.) - 5 hours and 35 minutes after the last test. The bottom of the form included instructions stating, “. . . (Chlorine MUST be checked a minimum of every 4 hours) . . .” During interview on 12/17/24 at 4:10 p.m., an administrative staff member (#1) confirmed staff had not checked the water system for chlorine every four hours on 11/04/24.”

    Rule V0196. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 18, 2024Standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 26, 1988.
  • Run as a non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 24 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (31 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 86% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 55 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Burleigh County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Chi St Alexius Health - Bismarck Dialysis2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.