Davita Coastal Plain Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Goldsboro, North Carolina 27534
209 NC Hwy 111 S, Goldsboro, North Carolina 27534. (919) 778-5766.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 12 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 28, 2024: a standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jun 28, 2024: standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care
The inspectors’ words, 1,099 words
“IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26622 Based on policy review, observation and interview, the patient care staff failed to disinfect the Central Venous Catheter (CVC) hubs per facility policy for 2 of 3 observed initiation of hemodialysis treatment with a CVC (PCT #5, Station #14, Station #13) and failed to disinfect a CVC exit site with ExSept Plus (hypochlorite) and allow to dry for two (2) minutes per facility policy for 2 of 2 observed CVC exit sites disinfected with ExSept Plus (PCT #5, Station #14, Station #13). Findings include: A. Review on 06/27/2024 of the facility policy titled “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) With Clearguard HD Antimicrobial End Caps” effective October 2023 revealed “ ... 16. Using aseptic technique, remove each cap. One at a time disinfect each CVC hub with a new alcohol prep pad. Scrub each CVC hub for 15 seconds including the sides, threads and end of hub thoroughly with friction making sure to remove any residue, for example blood. Hold the limbs until the antiseptic has dried.” 1. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 1143 in the patient treatment area revealed PCT #5 entered Station #14 and initiated access of a Central Venous Catheter (CVC). Observation revealed PCT #5 performed hand hygiene, applied clean gloves. Observation revealed PCT #5 cleansed the arterial and venous catheter hubs for 10 seconds. Observation revealed the PCT failed to disinfect the catheter hubs per facility policy. Observation revealed PCT #5 failed to cleanse each catheter hub for 15 seconds per facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1150 with PCT #5 revealed “I thought I cleaned the catheter hubs for 15 seconds.” Interview revealed each CVC hub should be cleansed for 15 seconds. Interview revealed PCT #5 did not disinfect the catheter hubs per facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1530 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to scrub each catheter hub with an alcohol pad for fifteen (15) seconds per facility policy. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy. 2. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 1225 in the patient treatment area revealed PCT #5 entered Station #13 and initiated access of a Central Venous Catheter (CVC). Observation revealed PCT #5 performed hand hygiene, applied clean gloves. Observation revealed PCT #5 cleansed the arterial and venous catheter hubs for 10 seconds. Observation revealed the PCT failed to disinfect the catheter hubs per facility policy. Observation revealed PCT #5 failed to cleanse each catheter hub for 15 seconds per facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1230 with PCT #5 revealed each CVC hub should be cleansed for 15 seconds. Interview revealed PCT #5 did not disinfect the catheter hubs per facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1530 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to scrub each catheter hub with an alcohol pad for fifteen (15) seconds per facility policy. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy. B. Review on 06/27/2024 of the facility policy titled “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) With Clearguard HD Antimicrobial End Caps” effective October 2023 revealed “... NOTES: ...first choice for CVC care is 2% Chlorhexidine/70% Alcohol swab. If these agents are contraindicated for a patient, the physician will prescribe an agent for the individual patient and individual supplies will be used in place of the CVC kit, per manufacturer’s recommendations.” Review of policy documentation on use of ExSept Plus (Hypochlorite) revealed saturate 2x2 gauze with 3-5 milliliters and use at least two sterile gauze for site for 60 seconds and allow site to dry for 2 minutes. 1. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 1143 in the patient treatment area revealed PCT #5 entered Station #14 and initiated CVC exit site care for dialysis treatment with a CVC. PCT #5 cleansed the CVC exit site and area around site with ExSept Plus for 30 seconds and allowed to dry for fifteen (15) seconds. Observation revealed that the PCT failed to disinfect the CVC exit site for sixty (60) seconds and allow the exit site to dry for two (2) minutes per facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1150 with PCT #5 revealed that the technician did not know that when using ExSept Plus, the site had to be disinfected for 60 seconds and allowed to dry for 2 minutes. The interview confirmed that PCT #5 did not follow the facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1530 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to disinfect the CVC catheter exit site for 60 seconds and allow to dry for 2 minutes when using ExSept Plus antiseptic per facility policy. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy. 2. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 1225 in the patient treatment area revealed PCT #5 entered Station #13 and initiated CVC exit site care for dialysis treatment with a CVC. PCT #5 cleansed the CVC exit site and area around site with ExSept Plus for 30 seconds and allowed to dry for thirty (30) seconds. Observation revealed that the PCT failed to disinfect the CVC exit site for sixty (60) seconds and allow the exit site to dry for two (2) minutes per facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1230 with PCT #5 revealed that the technician did not know that when using ExSept Plus, the site had to be disinfected for 60 seconds and allowed to dry for 2 minutes. The interview confirmed that PCT #5 did not follow the facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1530 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to disinfect the CVC catheter exit site for 60 seconds and allow to dry for 2 minutes when using ExSept Plus antiseptic per facility policy. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy.”
-
Vascular Access - Monitor/Referrals
The inspectors’ words, 564 words
“POC-VASCULAR ACCESS-MONITOR/REFERRALS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(5) The interdisciplinary team must provide vascular access monitoring and appropriate, timely referrals to achieve and sustain vascular access. The hemodialysis patient must be evaluated for the appropriate vascular access type, taking into consideration co-morbid conditions, other risk factors, and whether the patient is a potential candidate for arteriovenous fistula placement. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26622 Based on policy and procedure review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff performed skin antisepsis per policy before cannulation of 2 of 2 Arterio-venous fistula/graft (AVF/AVG) cannulation procedures observed (Station #21, PCT #3; Station #15,RN #4). Findings included: Review on 06/28/2024 of the facility policy titled “AV (Arterio-venous) Fistula or Graft Cannulation ...” revised October 2022 revealed “ ... Skin Antiseptic: Povidone Iodine; Effective Volume: At least 1 prep pad per site or 1 saturated sterile gauze pad per site; Effective Contact Time: 30 seconds; Air Drying Time: 2 minutes ...” 1. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 1210 in the patient treatment area revealed PCT #3 entered Station #21 and initiated access of an Arterio-venous fistula/graft (AVF/G) for hemodialysis treatment. PCT #3 performed hand hygiene and applied clean gloves. The PCT #3 cleansed the arterial access site with a Povidone Iodine pad for a total of 10 seconds. PCT #3 cleansed the venous access site with a Povidone Iodine pad for a total of 10 seconds. PCT #3 allowed the access sites to dry for 2 minutes before cannulation. Observation revealed PCT #3 failed to disinfect each access site for 30 seconds per the facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1220 with PCT #3 revealed that each site should be disinfected for 30 seconds. Interview revealed that PCT #3 thought she had cleaned each access site for 30 seconds. Interview revealed PCT #2 failed to disinfect the access sites per facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1530 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to disinfect each access site for 30 seconds when using Povidone Iodine pads and allow the site to dry for 2 minutes, prior to cannulating. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy. 2. Observation on 06/28/2024 at 1005 in the patient treatment area revealed RN #4 entered Station #15 and initiated access of an Arterio-venous fistula/graft (AVF/G) for hemodialysis treatment. RN #4 performed hand hygiene and applied clean gloves. RN #4 disinfected the arterial access site with a Povidone Iodine pad for a total of 20 seconds. RN #4 disinfected the venous access site with a Povidone Iodine pad for a total of 20 seconds. RN #4 allowed the access sites to dry for 2 minutes before cannulation. Observation revealed RN #4 failed to disinfect each access site for 30 seconds per the facility policy. Interview on 06/28/2024 at 1015 with RN #4 revealed that the disinfect contact time was 30 seconds to each access site. Interview revealed that RN #4 thought thought that she had cleaned each access site for 30 seconds. Interview revealed RN #4 failed to disinfect the access sites per facility policy. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 1530 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to clean each access site for 30 seconds when using Povidone Iodine pads and allow the site to dry for 2 minutes, prior to cannulating. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2024 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 10, 2018.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 12 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 7 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Wayne County, 6 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Davita Goldsboro Dialysis | 3 |
| Davita Mt Olive Dialysis | 3 |
| Fmc Rai Care Centers Goldsboro | 2 |
| Davita Goldsboro South Dialysis | 2 |
| Davita Rosewood Dialysis | 3 |
| Davita Eagles Nest Home Training | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.