Hearth Record

Davita Dialysis Care of Hoke County

A dialysis facility in Raeford, North Carolina 28376

403 South Main Street, Raeford, North Carolina 28376. (910) 875-6561.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 3, 2025: a standard inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 3, 2025: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 1,065 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51294 Based on facility policy review, medical record reviews, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to monitor a patient at a minimum of every 30 minutes during hemodialysis treatments for 4 of 6 sampled in-center hemodialysis records reviewed (Patients #1, #2, #3, and #4). Findings included: Review on 12/03/2025 of the facility policy titled, “PRE-INTRA-POST TREATMENT DATA COLLECTION, MONITORING AND NURSING ASSESSMENT” revised April 2024 revealed, “INTRADIALYTIC DATA COLLECTION/ASSESSMENT ...9. Intradialytic treatment monitoring and data collection...includes: a. Vital signs and treatment monitoring...iii. For non-nocturnal treatments are completed at least every thirty (30) minutes. b. At a minimum, obtain and document the following: i. Blood pressure ii. Heart or pulse rate iii. Blood and dialysate flows, arterial and venous pressures iv. Fluid removal and/or replacement v. Vascular access visible and line connections intact vi. Patient subjective statement(s) i.e., patient report on overall health, any complaints.” 1. Open medical record review on 12/03/2025 for Patient #1 revealed a 47-year-old male admitted to the facility for ICHD (In Center Hemodialysis) treatments on 11/13/2023. Review of the treatment sheet dated 11/17/2025 revealed the treatment started at 0936 and ended at 1254 for a duration of 193 minutes. Review of the monitoring documentation dated 11/17/2025 revealed Patient #1’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters were monitored by staff at 1033 and monitored next by staff at 1119 (46 minutes later). Review revealed the facility staff failed to monitor the patient’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters at least every 30-45 minutes during the hemodialysis treatments on 11/17/2025. Interview on 12/03/2025 at 1600 with the Clinical Manager revealed the staff were expected to monitor the patients every 30 minutes during treatments. Interview revealed the staff should have documented the monitoring in the patient’s treatment record. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy on 11/17/2025 for Patient #1. 2. Open medical record review on 12/03/2025 for Patient #2 revealed a 56-year-old patient admitted to the facility for ICHD (In Center Hemodialysis) treatments on 09/08/2025. Review of the treatment sheet dated 11/10/2025 revealed the treatment started at 1143 and ended at 1559 for a duration of 235 minutes. Review of the monitoring documentation dated 11/10/2025 revealed Patient #2’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters were monitored by staff at 1153 and monitored next by staff at 1253 (60 minutes later). Review of the treatment sheet dated 11/12/2025 revealed the treatment started at 1147 and ended at 1534 for a duration of 217 minutes. Review of the monitoring documentation dated 11/12/2025 revealed Patient #2’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters were monitored by staff at 1205 and monitored next by staff at 1243 (38 minutes later). Review of the treatment sheet dated 11/14/2025 revealed the treatment started at 1103 and ended at 1535 for a duration of 233 minutes. Review of the monitoring documentation dated 11/14/2025 revealed Patient #2’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters were monitored by staff at 1235 and monitored next by staff at 1327 (52 minutes later). Review revealed the facility staff failed to monitor the patient’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters at least every 30-45 minutes during the hemodialysis treatments on 11/10/2025, 11/12/2025, and 11/14/2025. Interview on 12/03/2025 at 1600 with the Clinical Manager revealed the staff were expected to monitor the patients every 30-45 minutes during treatments. Interview revealed the staff should have documented the monitoring in the patient’s treatment record. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy on 11/10/2025, 11/12/2025, and 11/14/2025 for Patient #2. 3. Open medical record review on 12/03/2025 for Patient #3 revealed a 60-year-old female admitted to the facility for ICHD (In Center Hemodialysis) treatments on 02/28/2025. Review of the treatment sheet dated 11/14/2025 revealed the treatment started at 1126 and ended at 1427 for a duration of 178 minutes. Review of the monitoring documentation dated 11/14/2025 revealed Patient #3’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters were monitored by staff at 1230 and monitored next by staff at 1306 (36 minutes later). Review of the treatment sheet dated 11/19/2025 revealed the treatment started at 1101 and ended at 1520 for a duration of 259 minutes. Review of the monitoring documentation dated 11/19/2025 revealed Patient #3’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters were monitored by staff at 1405 and monitored next by staff at 1520 (75 minutes later). Review revealed the facility staff failed to monitor the patient’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters at least every 30-45 minutes during the hemodialysis treatments on 11/14/2025 and 11/19/2025. Interview on 12/03/2025 at 1600 with the Clinical Manager revealed the staff were expected to monitor the patients every 30-45 minutes during treatments. Interview revealed the staff should have documented the monitoring in the patient’s treatment record. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy on 11/14/2025 and 11/19/2025 for Patient #3. 4. Open medical record review on 12/03/2025 for Patient #4 revealed an 86-year-old male admitted to the facility for ICHD (In Center Hemodialysis) treatments on 09/08/2025. Review of the treatment sheet dated 11/12/2025 revealed the treatment started at 1050 and ended at 1409 for a duration of 178 minutes. Review of the monitoring documentation dated 11/12/2025 revealed Patient #4’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters were monitored by staff at 1254 and monitored next by staff at 1354 (60 minutes later). Review of the treatment sheet dated 11/21/2025 revealed the treatment started at 1051 and ended at 1430 for a duration of 186 minutes. Review of the monitoring documentation dated 11/21/2025 revealed Patient #4’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters were monitored by staff at 1153 and monitored next by staff at 1243 (47 minutes later). Review revealed the facility staff failed to monitor the patient’s blood pressure, pulse and machine parameters at least every 30-45 minutes during the hemodialysis treatments on 11/12/2025 and 11/21/2025. Interview on 12/03/2025 at 1600 with the Clinical Manager revealed the staff were expected to monitor the patients every 30-45 minutes during treatments. Interview revealed the staff should have documented the monitoring in the patient’s treatment record. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy on 11/12/2025 and 11/21/2025 for Patient #4.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 3, 2025Standard inspection1 deficiency cited
Dec 5, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 5, 1995.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 24 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (30 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 60% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Hoke County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Davita Fayetteville Road Dialysis3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.