Hearth Record

Davita Dialysis Care of Rutherford County

A dialysis facility in Forest City, North Carolina 28043

226 Commercial Drive, Forest City, North Carolina 28043. (828) 248-3660.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 7, 2024: a standard inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 7, 2024: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 1,778 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35306 Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility patient care staff failed to notify the nurse of elevated blood pressure readings in 4 of 6 ICHD sampled records (Patient #2, #3, #4, and #6) and the licensed nurse failed to administer Clonidine and to notify the MD/FNP [Medical Doctor/Family Nurse Practitioner] per the facility’s Blood Pressure Protocol for 1 of 1 ICHD records sampled that met the facility’s established parameters for the administration of Clonidine (Patient #3). Findings included: 1. Review on 03/06/2024 of the facility’s policy titled, “PRE-INTRA-POST TREATMENT DATA COLLECTION, MONITORING AND NURSING ASSESSMENT” Revision Date: October 2023, revealed “...INTRADIALYTIC DATA COLLECTION /ASSESSMENT ... Any abnormal findings or findings outside of any patient specific physician ordered parameters discovered during pre, intra, or post treatment data collection will be documented and immediately reported to the licensed nurse. An assessment by the nurse prior to initiation of dialysis, during dialysis, and/or prior to discharge will be triggered by an abnormal finding. The medical record should indicate the finding, the intervention, physician notification, physician orders, and the patient response... 11. Abnormal findings or findings outside of any patient specific physician ordered parameters will be reported to the licensed nurse immediately (refer to “Abnormal Findings” section in this policy) ... ABNORMAL FINDINGS ... the following are considered abnormal findings and should be reported to the licensed nurse and documented in the patient’s medical record ... Blood pressure: Pre-dialysis: * Systolic greater than 180 ... or less than 90 ... * Diastolic greater than or equal to 100 ... Blood Pressure-Intradialytic: * Difference of 20 ... increase or decrease from patient’s last intradialytic treatment BP reading ... Blood Pressure Post Treatment: * If the patient can stand: - Standing systolic BP greater than 140 ....or less than 90 - Standing diastolic BP greater than 90 ....or less than 50 ... * Sitting BP of patient’s that cannot stand: * Sitting systolic BP greater than 140 ....or less than 90 * Sitting diastolic BP greater than 90 ....or less than 50 ...” a. Medical record review on 03/05/2024 for Patient #2 (ICHD #2) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 05/12/2018 for ICHD treatment. Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 02/17/2024 revealed the patient dialyzed from 0709-1115. Review of the treatment flowsheet revealed Patient #2’s blood pressures were as follows: At 0901, BP of 131/76, 152/84 at 0931 (30 minutes later with an increased difference of 20 in SBP from last reading), and 134/108 at 1001 (30 minutes later with a, increased difference of 20 in DBP from last reading). Further review of the treatment flowsheet revealed at 1031, the patient’s BP was 112/65, 94/54 at 1101, 68/43 at 1114, and 80/40 at 1115 and 153/136 at 1420. Review of the medical record revealed no documented nursing notification by the patient care staff of the patient’s intradialytic blood pressure readings per policy. Interview on 03/05/2024 at 0945 revealed the facility’s Medical Director was out of country and unavailable for interview. Interview on 03/07/2024 at 1715 with the FA revealed the staff were expected to notify the nurse of any changes in the patient’s condition, including blood pressure readings, and to document nursing notification in the medical record. Interview revealed, “The Pre, Post and Intradialytic note should include any abnormal symptoms (hypotension, hypertension, cramping, etc.). Anything abnormal to [the patient’s] baseline, SBP less than 100, greater than 180, or a difference of 20 mmHg should be reported.” b. Medical record review on 03/05/2024 for Patient #3 (ICHD #3) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 03/12/2020 for ICHD treatment. Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 03/02/2024 revealed the patient dialyzed from 0909-1314 with a pre-treatment BPs of 213/94 standing and 249/99 sitting. Review of the treatment flowsheet revealed the pre-treatment nursing assessment was completed by RN #1 at 0845. Further review of the treatment flowsheet revealed Patient #3’s blood pressures were as follows: At 0909, BP of 221/98, 242/103 at 0931, and 202/89 at 1001. Review of the medical record revealed no documented nursing notification by the patient care staff of the patient’s elevated blood pressure readings per policy. Interview on 03/05/2024 at 0945 revealed the facility’s Medical Director was out of country and unavailable for interview. Interview on 03/07/2024 at 1715 with the FA revealed the staff were expected to notify the nurse of any changes in the patient’s condition, including blood pressure readings, and to document nursing notification in the medical record. Interview revealed, “The Pre, Post and Intradialytic note should include any abnormal symptoms (hypotension, hypertension, cramping, etc.). Anything abnormal to [the patient’s] baseline, SBP less than 100, greater than 180, or a difference of 20 mmHg should be reported.” c. Medical record review on 03/06/2024 for Patient #4 (ICHD #4) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 10/17/2023 for ICHD treatment. Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 03/02/2024 revealed the patient dialyzed from 1135-1536. Review of the treatment flowsheet revealed the post-treatment BPs at 1539 were 167/102 standing and 173/101 sitting. Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 02/27/2024 revealed the patient dialyzed from 1106-1503. Review of the treatment flowsheet revealed the post-treatment BPs at 1504 were 185/105 standing and 171/101 sitting. Review of the medical record revealed no documented nursing notification by the patient care staff of the patient’s elevated blood pressure readings post-treatment per policy. Interview on 03/05/2024 at 0945 revealed the facility’s Medical Director was out of country and unavailable for interview. Interview on 03/07/2024 at 1715 with the FA revealed the staff were expected to notify the nurse of any changes in the patient’s condition, including blood pressure readings, and to document nursing notification in the medical record. Interview revealed, “The Pre, Post and Intradialytic note should include any abnormal symptoms (hypotension, hypertension, cramping, etc.). Anything abnormal to [the patient’s] baseline, SBP less than 100, greater than 180, or a difference of 20 mmHg should be reported.” d. Medical record review on 03/06/2024 for Patient #6 (ICHD #6) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 02/12/2024 for ICHD treatment. Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 02/21/2024 revealed the patient dialyzed from 1142-1552. Review of the treatment flowsheet revealed the patient’s blood pressures as follows: BP of 131/74 at 1404 and 164/116 at 1432 (with an increased difference of 20 in SBP and DBP from last reading). Review of the medical record revealed no documented nursing notification by the patient care staff of the patient’s intradialytic elevated blood pressure reading per policy. Interview on 03/05/2024 at 0945 revealed the facility’s Medical Director was out of country and unavailable for interview. Interview on 03/07/2024 at 1715 with the FA revealed the staff were expected to notify the nurse of any changes in the patient’s condition, including blood pressure readings, and to document nursing notification in the medical record. Interview revealed, “The Pre, Post and Intradialytic note should include any abnormal symptoms (hypotension, hypertension, cramping, etc.). Anything abnormal to [the patient’s] baseline, SBP less than 100, greater than 180, or a difference of 20 mmHg should be reported.” 2. Review on 03/06/2024 of the facility’s “Blood Pressure Protocol” Effective: 08/09/2023, revealed “Hypertension SBP >200 and or DBP >110 Pre Treatment 1. Initiate treatment and monitor vitals every 30 minutes. 2. At 60 minutes if over parameters administer clonidine [used to treat high blood pressure] 0.1mg [milligram] 3. Monitor vital signs every 30 minutes. 4. At 60 minutes after administration of Clonidine if BP continues over parameters notify MD/FNP [Medical Doctor/Family Nurse Practitioner] Intradialytic 1. Repeat above steps beginning at #2 ... *IF AT ANYTIME THE PATIENT BECOMES SYMPTOMATIC TREAT SYMPTOMS AND NOFITY RN/MD/FNP.” a. Medical record review on 03/05/2024 for Patient #3 (ICHD #3) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 03/12/2020 for ICHD treatment. Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 02/27/2024 revealed the patient dialyzed from 0908-1200 with pre-treatment BPs of 155/83 standing and 105/66 sitting. Review of the treatment flowsheet revealed the nursing pre-treatment assessment was completed by RN #1 at 0908. Further review of the treatment flowsheet revealed Patient #3’s blood pressures were as follows: At 0909, BP of 229/88, 191/94 at 0931, 220/178 with “rechecking bp” noted by PCT #1 at 1001. At 1002, BP 222/178, 206/80 at 1003 with “RN @ chairside” noted by PCT #1. Further review revealed at 1031, the patient’s BP was recorded as 217/101, 226/112 at 1101, 194/91 at 1131, and 138/112 at 1200. Review of the post-treatment BPs revealed a BP of 163/87 standing and 210/102 sitting. Review of the treatment flowsheet dated 02/24/2024 revealed the patient dialyzed from 0913-1142 with a pre-treatment BP of 232/208 sitting. Review of the treatment flowsheet revealed the nursing pre-treatment assessment was completed by RN #1 at 0905. Further review of the treatment flowsheet revealed at 1010, the patient’s BP was 102/59 with a note from PCT #2 stating, “UF [Ultrafiltration] turned off due to pt complaints of being dizzy; RN aware; BFR [Blood Flow rate] to 280 Due to ap [arterial pressure] alarm.” Review of the intradialytic BP readings following the patient’s report of dizziness revealed the following: At 1031, a BP of 130/62, 1101 BP 113/91, 1132 BP 201/87, and 1142 BP 194/96. Review of the post-treatment vital signs revealed a post-treatment BP of 163/87 standing and 204/84 sitting. Review of the medical record revealed no documented nursing assessment of the patient’s elevated BPs on 02/27/2024 or 02/24/2024 by RN #1, administration of Clonidine, or notification of the MD/FNP for orders prior to discharge for BP over parameters per facility policy. Interview on 03/05/2024 at 0945 revealed the facility’s Medical Director was out of country and unavailable for interview. Interview on 03/07/2024 at 1230 with the FA revealed the Patient’s assigned nurse (RN #1) on 02/27/2024 and 02/24/2024, the patient’s assigned PCT (PCT #1) on 02/27/2024 and assigned PCT (PCT #2) were not available for interview. Interview on 03/07/2024 at 1715 with the FA revealed nursing staff should assess any reported abnormal findings, document the assessment, administer Clonidine to hypertensive patients meeting parameters outlined in the facility’s Blood Pressure Protocol with prn Clonidine orders, and notify the MD/FNP prior to the patient’s discharge if the patient’s BP is over parameters post-treatment per the facility’s protocol. Interview revealed that in review of the patient’s treatment flowsheet, the facility nursing staff failed to follow the facility’s Hypertension [elevated blood pressure] protocol.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 7, 2024Standard inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Feb 9, 1994.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 30 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (38 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 62% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Rutherford County.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.