Fmc Bma of Pamlico
A dialysis facility in Washington, North Carolina 27889
1983 West Fifth Street, Washington, North Carolina 27889. (252) 975-5950.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 25 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 21, 2025: a standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 21, 2025: standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care
The inspectors’ words, 389 words
“IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26622 Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to prevent potential cross contamination by failing to ensure a clean field was under the CVC limbs in one of two observation during a discontinuation using a CVC (PCT #3, Station #17) Findings included: Review on 03/21/2025 of the facility policy titled “Termination of Treatment Using a Central Venous Catheter and Optiflux Single Use Ebeam Dialyzer,” published 11/04/2024 revealed “... Prior to Termination: Preparation ... Step 5. Ensure that a clean underpad is below the catheter limbs to protect the work area and the clothing. ... Termination: Disinfection of of Catheter and Disconnecting the Patient ... Step 6 ...NOTE: Do not place uncapped catheter limbs on underpad to prevent contamination. 7. Hold the limb while allowing the antiseptic to dry. ...” Observation on 03/19/2025 at 1524 on the treatment floor revealed PCT #3 discontinued a hemodialysis treatment with Central Venous Catheter at Station #17. PCT #3 donned clean gloves, disconnected the extracorporeal lines from the CVC , without placing a new clean under pad under the CVC limbs. Observation revealed the facility policy was not followed. Interview on 03/19/2025 at 1530 with PCT #3 revealed that the PCT usually places a clean underpad under the catheter limbs but admitted that she did not place the clean pad under the catheter limbs during the observation. The facility staff failed to follow the facility policy for discontinuing a Central Venous Catheter.”
-
Vascular Access - Monitor/Referrals
The inspectors’ words, 534 words
“POC-VASCULAR ACCESS-MONITOR/REFERRALS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(5) The interdisciplinary team must provide vascular access monitoring and appropriate, timely referrals to achieve and sustain vascular access. The hemodialysis patient must be evaluated for the appropriate vascular access type, taking into consideration co-morbid conditions, other risk factors, and whether the patient is a potential candidate for arteriovenous fistula placement. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26622 Based on policy and procedure review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff performed skin antisepsis per policy before cannulation of 2 of 2 Arterio-venous fistula/graft (AVF/AVG) cannulation procedures observed (Station #19, PCT #2; Station #1, PCT #1). Findings include: Review on 03/21/2025 of the facility policy “Access Assessment and Cannulation,” Published: 05/06/2024, revealed “... Assessment of Vascular Access ... Skin Disinfection Step 1 Disinfect cannulation site as follows using any of the disinfectants below: 70% isopropyl alcohol pad: Using gentle friction, clean the access site beginning in the center and continuing outward 2 inches in a concentric circle for 30 seconds and allow to dry before cannulation. ...” 1. Observation on 03/19/2025 at 1145 in the patient treatment area, revealed PCT #2 entered Station #19 and prepared to access the patient’s AVF/AVG. Observation revealed PCT #2 donned clean gloves and applied antiseptic (70% isopropyl alcohol pad) to each access site over the skin in a concentric circle for 5 seconds. The observation revealed the PCT failed to clean each access site for 30 seconds per facility policy. Interview on 03/19/2025 at 1150 with PCT #2 revealed that PCT #2 verbalized the appropriate cleaning time for the cannulation of access sites. Interview revealed PCT #2 did not use the second hand on the available treatment floor clocks. Interview revealed PCT #2 failed to clean/disinfect each of the access sites for 30 seconds, prior to cannulation and securing the needles. Interview revealed PCT #2 failed to follow the facility policy. Interview on 03/21/2025 at 1600 with the Charge Nurse and Operations Director revealed the staff were expected to disinfect each access site for 30 seconds when using alcohol pads. Interview revealed the PCT did not follow the facility policy. 2. Observation on 03/21/2025 at 1045 in the patient treatment area, revealed PCT #1 entered Station #1 and prepared to access the patient’s AVF/AVG. Observation revealed PCT #1 donned clean gloves and applied antiseptic (70% isopropyl alcohol pad) to each access site over the skin in a concentric circle for less than 10 seconds. Observation revealed PCT #1 failed to clean each access site for 30 seconds per facility policy. Interview on 03/19/2025 at 1100 with PCT #1 revealed that PCT #1 verbalized the appropriate cleaning time for the cannulation of access sites. Interview revealed PCT #1 did not use the second hand on the available treatment floor clocks. Interview revealed PCT #1 failed to clean/disinfect each of the access sites for 30 seconds, prior to cannulation and securing the needles. Interview revealed PCT #1 failed to follow the facility policy. Interview on 03/21/2025 at 1600 with the Charge Nurse and Operations Director revealed the staff were expected to disinfect each access site for 30 seconds when using alcohol pads. Interview revealed the PCT did not follow the facility policy.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 12, 1993.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 25 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (42 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 59% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Beaufort County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.