Davita Sedc Burgaw Dialysis Center
A dialysis facility in Burgaw, North Carolina 28425
704 South Dickerson Street, Burgaw, North Carolina 28425. (910) 259-9925.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 18 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 9, 2025: a standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 9, 2025: standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care
The inspectors’ words, 560 words
“IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26622 Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to prevent potential cross contamination by failing to place a clean field under the CVC (Central Venous Catheter) limbs and disinfect the CVC hubs per facility policy in one of two observation during a hemodialysis treatment discontinuation using a CVC (PCT #4, Station #8). Findings include: Review on 07/09/2025 of the facility policy titled “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) with Clearguard HD Antimicrobial End Caps Procedure” revised April 2025 revealed “... 16. Verify both catheter clamps are closed. Using aseptic technique, remove each cap. One at a time, disinfect each CVC hub with a new alcohol prep pad. Scrub each CVC hub for 15 seconds including the sides, threads and end of hub thoroughly with friction making sure to remove any residue, for example blood. Hold the limbs until the antiseptic has dried. Upon Completion of Dialysis ... 28. Discard used barrier that was used during treatment and place a new clean, moisture proof barrier under catheter to prevent contamination. ...” Observation on 07/09/2025 at 1145 in the patient treatment area revealed PCT #4 entered Station #8 and initiated termination of a Central Venous Catheter (CVC). Observation revealed PCT #4 performed hand hygiene and applied clean gloves. The PCT disconnected the extracorporeal lines from the CVC without placing a new clean moisture barrier pad under the CVC limbs. Observation revealed PCT #4 cleansed the arterial catheter hub and the venous catheter hubs for 5 seconds each. The observation revealed that PCT #4 failed to cleanse each catheter hub for 15 seconds per facility policy. Observation revealed the facility policy was not followed. Interview on 07/09/2025 at 1200 with PCT #4 revealed the PCT did not place a clean field under the catheter limbs prior to removing the dialysis lines. The PCT stated “was not aware that a clean field had to be placed.” The PCT stated that the hubs were disinfected for 15 seconds. Interview revealed that PCT #4 did not watch the clock above the station while disinfecting the catheter hubs. Interview on 07/09/2025 at 1615 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed that the staff should place a clean moisture barrier pad underneath the catheter limbs to prevent contamination and anytime a barrier pad became soiled. Interview revealed that the staff were expected to scrub each catheter hub with an alcohol pad for fifteen (15) seconds per facility policy. Interview revealed the staff failed to follow the facility policy.”
-
Manage Volume Status
The inspectors’ words, 1,073 words
“POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26622 Based on facility policy review, medical record reviews, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure machine prescription verifications were performed by a nurse within one hour of initiation of hemodialysis treatment in 2 of 5 (Patients #2 and #4, ) sampled in-center hemodialysis records reviewed and failed to monitor a patient at a minimum of every 30 minutes during hemodialysis treatments for 4 of 5 sampled in-center hemodialysis records reviewed (Pt. #1, #2, #3 and #5) Findings include: Review on 07/09/2025 of the facility policy titled “PRE-INTRA-POST TREATMENT DATA COLLECTION, MONITORING AND NURSING ASSESSMENT” revised April 2024 revealed “Policy .... 3. Patient identity, prescription and machine settings are verified by teammate prior to initiation of treatment ... The prescription components are confirmed by a licensed nurse within one (1) hour of treatment initiation ...” 1. Review of the medical record for Patient #2 revealed a 70-year-old male admitted for In-Center Hemodialysis treatments on 05/06/2025. Review of the Treatment Flowsheet dated 06/24/2025 revealed Patient #2’s treatment was initiated at 1119. Review of the Flowsheet revealed the Registered Nurse Machine Verification was performed at 1302 (1 hour and 43 minutes after initiation of treatment). Review of the Treatment Flowsheet dated 06/26/2025 revealed Patient #2’s treatment was initiated at 1046. Review of the Flowsheet revealed the Registered Nurse Machine Verification was performed at 1322 (2 hours and 36 minutes after initiation of treatment). Review of the Treatment Flowsheet dated 07/05/2025 revealed Patient #2’s treatment was initiated at 1119. Review of the Flowsheet revealed the Registered Nurse Machine Verification was performed at 1234 (75 minutes after initiation of treatment). Interview on 07/09/2025 at 1615 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the Registered Nurse was expected to document the machine verification within one (1) hour of the patient dialysis treatment initiation time. Interview revealed the Registered Nurse failed to follow the facility policy. 2. Review of the medical record for Patient #4 revealed a 56-year-old male admitted for In-Center Hemodialysis treatments on 01/14/2025. Review of the Treatment Flowsheet dated 06/26/2025 revealed Patient #4’s treatment was initiated at 0606. Review of the Flowsheet revealed the Registered Nurse Machine Verification was performed at 0716 (70 minutes after initiation of treatment). Interview on 07/09/2025 at 1615 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the Registered Nurse was expected to document the machine verification within one (1) hour of the patient dialysis treatment initiation time. Interview revealed the Registered Nurse failed to follow the facility policy. Review on 07/09/2025 of the facility policy titled “PRE-INTRA-POST TREATMENT DATA COLLECTION, MONITORING AND NURSING ASSESSMENT” revised April 2024 revealed “INTRADIALYTIC DATA COLLECTION/ASSESSMENT ...9. Intradialytic treatment monitoring and data collection ...includes: a. Vital signs and treatment monitoring iii. Non-nocturnal treatments are completed at least every thirty (30) minutes. ...b. At a minimum, obtain and document the following: i. Blood pressure. ii. Heart or pulse rate. iii. Blood and dialysate flows, arterial and venous pressures. iv. Fluid removal and/or replacement. v. Vascular access visible and line connections intact. vi. Patient subjective statement(s) i.e., patient report on overall health, any complaints.” 1. Review of the medical record for Patient #1 revealed a 61-year-old female admitted for In-Center Hemodialysis treatments on 01/24/2025. Review of the Treatment Flowsheet for 07/03/2025 revealed the staff documented monitoring at 1400 and the next monitoring documentation was at 1500 (60 minutes later). Interview on 07/09/2025 at 1615 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to monitor the patients every 30 minutes during treatments. Interview revealed the staff monitored vital signs, visualized the access sites and checked for wet transducers and machine parameters. Interview revealed the staff should have documented the monitoring in the patient’s treatment record. Interview revealed the staff failed to document the patient monitoring per policy. 2. Review of the medical record for Patient #2 revealed a 70-year-old male admitted for In-Center Hemodialysis treatments on 05/06/2025. Review of the Treatment Flowsheet for 06/24/2025 revealed the staff documented monitoring at 1119 and the next monitoring documentation was at 1201 (42 minutes later). Review revealed the staff documented monitoring at 1431 and the next monitoring documentation was at 1511 (40 minutes later). Interview on 07/09/2025 at 1615 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to monitor the patients every 30 minutes during treatments. Interview revealed the staff monitored vital signs, visualized the access sites and checked for wet transducers and machine parameters. Interview revealed the staff should have documented the monitoring in the patient’s treatment record. Interview revealed the staff failed to document the patient monitoring per policy. 3. Review of the medical record for Patient #3 revealed a 76-year-old male admitted for In-Center Hemodialysis treatments on 08/15/2024. Review of the Treatment Flowsheet for 07/01/2025 revealed the staff documented monitoring at 1105 and the next monitoring documentation was at 1204 (59 minutes later). Review revealed the staff documented monitoring at 1042 and the next monitoring documentation was at 1155 (73 minutes later). Interview on 07/09/2025 at 1615 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to monitor the patients every 30 minutes during treatments. Interview revealed the staff monitored vital signs, visualized the access sites and checked for wet transducers and machine parameters. Interview revealed the staff should have documented the monitoring in the patient’s treatment record. Interview revealed the staff failed to document the patient monitoring per policy. 4. Review of the medical record for Patient #5 revealed a 36-year-old female admitted for In-Center Hemodialysis treatments on 07/01/2025. Review of the Treatment Flowsheet for 07/03/2025 revealed the staff documented monitoring at 1442 and the next monitoring documentation was at 1526 (44 minutes later). Review revealed the staff documented monitoring at 1518 and the next monitoring documentation was at 1607 (51 minutes later). Interview on 07/09/2025 at 1615 with the Manager of Clinical Services revealed the staff were expected to monitor the patients every 30 minutes during treatments. Interview revealed the staff monitored vital signs, visualized the access sites and checked for wet transducers and machine parameters. Interview revealed the staff should have documented the monitoring in the patient’s treatment record. Interview revealed the staff failed to document the patient monitoring per policy.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2025 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Mar 1, 1992.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 18 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Pender County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Davita Surf City Dialysis | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.