Davita Eastland Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Independence, Missouri 64055
19101 E Valley View Pkwy Ste E, Independence, Missouri 64055. (816) 795-6018.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 1of 5 patient survey rating
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 20 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 26, 2024: a complaint inspection.
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 10, 2024: complaint and standard inspection5 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 215 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 17026 Based on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to wear gloves when they adjusted the dialysis machines during four (station # 16 twice, # 18, and # 20) observations. This had the potential to effect all patients on dialysis and cause an increase in cross contamination and infection risk. The facility census was 85. Findings included: 1. Observation on 7/8/24 at 2:19 PM showed staff (M) adjusted dialysis machine at station # 16 without gloves on her hands. 2. Observation on 7/8/24 at 2:21 PM showed staff (M) adjusted dialysis machine at station # 16 without gloves on her hands again. 3. Observation on 7/8/24 at 2:30 PM showed staff (M) adjusted the dialysis machine at station # 20 without gloves on her hands. 4. Observation on 7/8/24 at 2:38 PM showed staff (B) adjusted the dialysis machine at station # 18 without gloves on her hands. 5. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 1:47 PM, the facility administrator said staff should wear gloves when they adjust the dialysis machines.”
-
Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds
The inspectors’ words, 191 words
“IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 17026 Based on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure six vials of Vancomycin (antibiotic medication) were not expired and failed to ensure one vial of Lidocaine (medication used to reduce pain) was initialed and dated when staff opened the vial. This had the potential to effect all patients on dialysis and cause an increase in complications. The facility census was 85. Findings included: 1. Observation on 7/8/24 at 11:50 AM of the medication area showed six 500 milligram vials of Vancomycin that expired 7/1/24. 2. Observation on 7/8/24 at 11:52 AM of the medication area showed an approximately half full 10 milliliter vial of Lidocaine that staff did not initial or date when they opened it. 3. During an interview on 7/8/24 at 11:59 AM, the facility administrator said staff should initial and date all vials when opened and staff need to ensure medications were not expired.”
-
Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments
The inspectors’ words, 343 words
“PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 17026 Based on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure the patients’ dialysis access remained visible to staff during the patient’s dialysis treatment at eight (station # 5, # 6, # 7, # 8, # 9, # 11, # 16, and # 18) out of 20 dialysis stations. This had the potential to effect all patients on dialysis and cause an increase in complications in the event of a needle dislodgment or tubing disconnection. The facility census was 85. Findings included: 1. Observation on 7/8/24 at 11:45 AM showed the patient had their dialysis access covered with a blanket and not visible to staff at dialysis stations # 5, # 6, and # 8. 2. Observation on 7/8/24 at 12:32 PM showed the patient had their dialysis access covered with a blanket and not visible to staff at dialysis stations # 5 and # 18. 3. Observation on 7/8/24 at 1:01 PM showed the patient had their dialysis access covered with a blanket and not visible to staff at dialysis stations # 6 and # 18. 4. Observation on 7/8/24 at 1:54 PM showed the patient had their dialysis access covered with a blanket and not visible to staff at dialysis stations # 9 and # 18. 5. Observation on 7/9/24 at 8:31 AM showed the patient had their dialysis access covered with a blanket and not visible to staff at dialysis stations # 7 and # 16. 6. Observation on 7/9/24 at 1:03 PM showed the patient had their dialysis access covered with a blanket and not visible to staff at dialysis stations # 11 and # 16. 7. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 1:47 PM, the facility administrator said staff need to ensure the dialysis access is visible or document if the patient refuses to keep the dialysis access visible.”
-
Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx
The inspectors’ words, 235 words
“PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 17026 Based on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide dialysis treatment for the physician prescribed time for two (Patient # 6 and # 10) out of nine clinical records reviewed. This had the potential to effect all patients on dialysis and cause an increase in complications. The facility census was 85. Findings included: 1. Review of the treatment flow sheet dated 7/3/24 for Patient # 6 showed the patient’s physician directed staff to provide the patient with three hours of dialysis treatment. The treatment flow sheet showed staff stopped the patient’s dialysis treatment 29 minutes early and did not document the reason for stopping dialysis treatment early. 2. Review of the treatment flow sheet dated 7/3/24 for Patient # 10 showed the patient’s physician directed staff to provide the patient with four hours of dialysis treatment. The treatment flow sheet showed staff stopped the patient’s dialysis treatment 30 minutes early and did not document the reason for stopping dialysis treatment early. 3. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 1:47 PM, the facility administrator said staff should follow the physician order for the dialysis treatment time or document a reason for stopping dialysis treatment early.”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 319 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 17026 Based on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to conduct an initial nursing assessment within one hour of a patient starting on dialysis treatment for four (Patient # 18, # 35, # 46, and # 74) patients out of nine clinical records reviewed. This had the potential to effect all patients on dialysis treatment and cause an increase in complications. The facility census was 85. Findings included: 1. Review of the treatment flow sheet dated 7/1/24 for Patient # 74 showed staff started the patient on dialysis treatment at 11:36 AM but did not conduct the initial nursing assessment for the patient until 1:10 PM. 2. Review of the treatment flow sheet dated 7/6/24 for Patient # 46 showed staff started the patient on dialysis treatment at 6:29 AM but did not conduct the initial nursing assessment for the patient until 7:59 AM. 3. Review of the treatment flow sheet dated 7/5/24 for Patient # 35 showed staff started the patient on dialysis treatment at 12:02 PM but did not conduct the initial nursing assessment for the patient until 1:19 PM. 4. Review of the treatment flow sheet dated 7/3/24 for Patient # 18 showed staff started the patient on dialysis treatment at 11:15 AM but did not conduct the initial nursing assessment for the patient until 12:23 PM. 5. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 1:47 PM, the facility administrator said staff should conduct the initial nursing assessment within one hour of a patient starting on dialysis treatment or document a late entry note if they document late.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jul 10, 2024 | Complaint and standard inspection | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 22, 2008.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 20 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 1 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (34 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 52% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 1 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 19 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Jackson County, 17 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 4 of 5, 8 rated 3 of 5, 4 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.