Davita Pdi-Grand Rapids East
A dialysis facility in Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
1230 Ekhart St NE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503. (616) 742-8930.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 25 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 11, 2024: a standard inspection.
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 11, 2024: standard inspection5 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Infection Control
“CFC-INFECTION CONTROL CFR(s): 494.30 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 29955 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment, and failed to clean items within the dialysis treatment station inbetween patients resulting in the potential for the spread of infectious disease among the 126 patients receiving dialysis at the facility. Findings include: 1. Failure to maintain a sanitary environment (see tag V111) 2. Failure to clean items within the dialysis treatment station between patients (see tag V116)”
-
Ic - Sanitary Environment
The inspectors’ words, 789 words
“IC-SANITARY ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.30 The dialysis facility must provide and monitor a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents within and between the unit and any adjacent hospital or other public areas. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29955 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep a sanitary environment in the dialysis treatment area resulting in the potential for the spread of infectious disease amongst all 126 patient receiving dialysis treatment at the facility. Findings include: On 7/9/2024 at 1030 during initial tour of the dialysis treatment area it was revealed the treatment floor was filthy, and causing footwear to stick to the floor. On 7/9/2024 at 1035 during initial tour of the dialysis treatment area observation of clean privacy screens and the clean emergency cart revealed they were adjacent to and touching the handwashing sink. On 7/9/2024 at 1037 during initial tour of the dialysis treatment area, the window in station 24 and station 25 were observed to be cloudy and smeared with unknown substance. On 7/9/2024 at 1039 during initial tour of the dialysis treatment area at station 24 and station 25 computers used for charting treatment were placed above the dirty sink area with no splash guards. On 7/9/2024 at 1040 during initial tour of the dialysis treatment area behind station 2 a white dried substance was observed across the window blind. On 7/9/2024 at 1045 during initial tour of the dialysis treatment area dead insects were observed in window sills along the back wall behind stations 2, 3, and 4. On 7/9/2024 at 1050 during the initial tour of the dialysis treatment area at the south nurse’s station an accumulation of a dry gray substance was noted around an electrical outlet area. On 7/9/2024 at 1052 during the initial tour of the dialysis treatment area handwashing sink area at the south and north nursing stations a water pitcher and small cups for providing water to patients was observed. On 7/9/2024 at 1100 an interview was conducted with the Regional Operations Director, staff M. Staff M was queried about the concerns of an unsanitary environment within the dialysis unit specifically the dialysis treatment area. Staff M stated that the company was in the process of replacing the current cleaning service due to failure to meet contractual agreement. Staff M stated termination of the company had been an ongoing process. Staff M also stated that dialysis employees were staying over to clean the facility as best they could. Staff M was queried how long the current cleaning company had been in place at the facility. Staff M stated since January of 2024. 28042 On 07/09/2024 at 1045 during observations on the treatment floor, the surveyor observed a sink in the south pod, marked “clean sink”. During the observation a black insect was seen crawling along the front edge of the sink. There was a black substance observed behind the faucet along the entire back splash of the sink. An approximately 5 centimeter (cm) circular black stain was observed on the bottom of the clean sink along with a wet paper towel in the drain. Also observed on the south pod: The splash guard between the dirty sink and the medication administration area was observed to have a white substance which had appeared to have dripped down and dried onto the splash guard. On 07/09/2024 at 1150 during observations of the north pod treatment area, the counter near the dirty sink was observed to have a gray electrical box without a cover and a gray dusty substance surrounding the box. Needle covers were observed in the bottom of the dirty sink. 38905 During a tour of the water room, with Bio-med “G”, on 7/11/24 at 0944, it was observed that about 20 linear feet of vinyl coving was missing from behind the acid tanks and perimeter portions of the water room, glue was visibly left behind where it used to be. Further evaluation found a small puddle and drip in the back right corner of the water room. When pointed out to Bio-med “G”, she was unaware of the drip and had not noticed the missing vinyl coving. Observation behind the middle acid bulk tank found a large brown splash on the wall. When asked if cleaners come back and clean the water or if staff are supposed to maintain its upkeep, Bio-med “G” stated staff should be helping with its upkeep. During a tour of the utility storage room, on 7/11/24 at 1004, it was observed that the two middle racks would move back and forth in the room, but the outside perimeter racks were stationary. Observation under the perimeter stationary racks found accumulation of dust and debris.”
-
Ic - Items Taken To Station Disposed/Dedicated Or Disinfected
The inspectors’ words, 375 words
“IC-IF TO STATION=DISP/DEDICATE OR DISINFECT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Items taken into the dialysis station should either be disposed of, dedicated for use only on a single patient, or cleaned and disinfected before being taken to a common clean area or used on another patient. -- Nondisposable items that cannot be cleaned and disinfected (e.g., adhesive tape, cloth covered blood pressure cuffs) should be dedicated for use only on a single patient. -- Unused medications (including multiple dose vials containing diluents) or supplies (syringes, alcohol swabs, etc.) taken to the patient’s station should be used only for that patient and should not be returned to a common clean area or used on other patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 28042 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that items taken into the dialysis station were disinfected prior to being returned to a common clean area resulting in the potential to spread infectious agents to the 25 patients dialyzing on the treatment floor. Findings include: During an observation on 07/10/2024 at 0935, Staff J was observed bringing a large sharps container on wheels from the common area into patient station #10, using it while removing a patient from treatment, and returning it back to the common area without wiping it or cleaning it in any way. During an observation on 07/10/2024 at 0945, Staff L was observed bringing a large sharps container on wheels from the common area into patient station #12, using it while removing a patient from treatment, and returning it back to the common area without wiping it or cleaning it in any way. Staff Staff J (PCT) was queried on 07/10/2024 at 0950 as to the observations above. Staff J stated he should have cleaned the sharps container before taking it out of the station and that all items should be cleaned before being taken into the clean area. Review of facility, “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities” policy dated April 2023, revealed #12. Cleaning and/or disinfection of equipment and work surfaces will be performed as soon as possible following exposures to blood or other potentially infectious materials (i.e. used or brought into the station) and prior to returning to clean/designated area or removal from treatment area.”
-
Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu
The inspectors’ words, 340 words
“PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38905 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform required preventative maintenance for the facilities 2008T premium hemodialysis machines for two out of the three machines sampled, resulting in an increased risk for machine pumps and motors to fall out of proper calibration. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all patients in the facility. Findings Include: During a review of the facility’s annual preventative maintenance (APM) logs, of their 2008T premium hemodialysis machines, with Biomed “G”, starting on 7/10/24 at 1045, the following was found: Machine number seven was logged at 41,342 hours during its APM on 2/13/23 and then 45,573 hours on its last performed APM. This puts machine number seven’s operating hours at 4,231 hours between APM. Further review of machine 17 found hours logged were 40,171 on its APM performed on 1/16/23 and 44,590 hours logged on its APM performed on 1/4/24. This puts machine number 17’s operating hours at 4,419 hours between APM. An interview with Biomed “G” found that with the clinic being nocturnal and operating late into the night with machines, they can get a lot of use and make it hard to get the APM in time. Biomed “G” further stated, some machines they have to end up doing the APM for the semi-annual because the parts don’t last the full year. A review of the facilities “Preventative Maintenance Schedules for Equipment” policy, dated 2/1/2009, found that “Preventative Maintenance schedules must be made in accordance with the manufactures recommendation used to perform a patient treatment”. A review of the manufacturer’s directions for use section 3.0 “Annual (4000 hour) Preventative Maintenance” states: Perform the following preventative maintenance procedures every 12 months or 4000 hours of machine operation, whichever comes first.”
-
Assess Current Health Status Inc Comorbids
The inspectors’ words, 290 words
“PA-ASSESS CURRENT HEALTH STATUS/COMORBIDS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(1) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (1) Evaluation of current health status and medical condition, including co-morbid conditions. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 28042 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a registered nurse (RN) perform an assessment over an eight (8) month period for 1 (P-3) of 10 patients, out of a total sample of 10 patients reviewed, resulting in the potential for a poor patient outcome. Findings include: On 07/10/2024 at 1300, review of medical record for P-3 revealed she was a 78-year-old female admitted to the facility for in-center hemodialysis treatment on 09/08/2023 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. Review of monthly nursing progress notes for P-3 revealed monthly nursing progress notes dated 10/31/2023 and 11/25/2023 which documented a medication reconciliation, assessment of laboratory values, access, target weight, fluid, and modality. There were no monthly nursing progress notes after 11/25/2023 for P-3. In an interview on 07/10/2024 at 1345, Staff A stated he had reviewed the record for P-3 and did not locate any further monthly nursing progress notes or nursing assessments of P-3 that would count as the monthly progress note. Staff A stated it was the expectation that patients be assessed monthly by an RN and it be documented in their medical records. On 07/11/2024 at 1145, Review of the facility policy, “Progress Note Policy” dated October 2023 revealed, Nurse: Nurses are required to record patient progress notes at least monthly and for any clinical event, which must be recorded in a time frame that provides other disciplinary team members with an up-to-date picture of the status of the patient at all times.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2024 | Standard inspection | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 25, 2001.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- 25 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (66 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 77% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 9 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Kent County, 8 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 3 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.