Usrc New Carrollton Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Hyattsville, Maryland 20784
8317 Annapolis Rd, Hyattsville, Maryland 20784. (301) 459-1525.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 16 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 29, 2024: a standard inspection.
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 29, 2024: standard inspection6 deficiencies
-
Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols
The inspectors’ words, 315 words
“IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44367 Based on observations and a review of the facility’s policies and procedures, the governing body failed to ensure that the clinical staff followed the standard regulations in the cleaning and disinfection of contaminated equipment being used in the facility. This failure placed the patients at potential risk for exposure to blood-borne pathogens and infectious diseases. Staff: #1 Findings included: Review on 04/24/2024 of the facility’s policy # C-IC-0080 entitled “Disinfection and Cleaning of Dialysis Machine Equipment” states, “Complete surface disinfection at the end of each dialysis treatment after the patient has vacated the station.” The policy also states, “Clean all external surfaces of the dialysis machine to include top, sides, front, back, blood pressure cuffs and basket: dialysate connectors and lines; hand sanitizer and holder; IV pole, items hanging on pole, attached computer monitors and keyboard/mouse.” On 04/24/2024 at 11:10 a.m., the surveyor observed that during the termination process at Station #8 machine #6, Staff #1 did not clean the prime bucket or the items at the top of the hemodialysis machine which consist of two blue clamps, clear bag and a white laminated paper. On 04/26/2024 at 10:15 a.m., at station #12 machine #1, the surveyor noted that the machine was newly assembled and in test mode for the next patient’s treatment while the current patient was holding their vascular access in order to stop the bleeding. Staff #1 did not wait until the station was completely vacated before setting up for a new patient. The Facility Administrator was informed of the findings on 04/24/2024 and 04/26/2024.”
-
Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care
The inspectors’ words, 367 words
“IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44367 Based on observations and review of the facility’s policies and procedures, the governing body and the medical director failed to ensure that the clinical staff complied with the appropriate catheter care techniques and procedures. This failure placed patients at potential risk of infection or harm in maintaining their central venous catheter. Staff: #2 Findings include: According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), “A central venous catheter (CVC) is an indwelling device inserted into a large, central vein (most commonly the internal jugular, subclavian, or femoral) and advanced until the terminal lumen resides within the inferior vena cava, superior vena cava, or right atrium [parts of the heart].” Review on 04/25/20204 of the facility’s policy C-TI-0090 entitled “Accessing and De-Accessing the Dialysis Catheter” revealed, “Using aseptic technique, disconnect arterial bloodline from catheter...Disinfect the hub with an alcohol prep pad. Clean the sides (threads) and end of the hub thoroughly with friction, making sure to remove any residue (e.g. blood). Allow to dry.” During observation of the clinical treatment area on 04/25/2024 at 11:41 a.m., during treatment termination of a Central Venous Catheter (CVC) patient at station #1 machine #4, Staff #2 did not clean the venous hub immediately after disconnecting the arterial bloodline and before attaching the 10 ml syringe. The Facility Administrator was informed of the findings on 04/25/2024.”
-
Environment: Secure And Restricted
The inspectors’ words, 240 words
“ENVIRONMENT-SECURE & RESTRICTED CFR(s): 494.40(a) 8 Environment: secure & restricted The water purification and storage system should be located in a secure area that is readily accessible to authorized users. The location should be chosen with a view to minimizing the length and complexity of the distribution system. Access to the purification system should be restricted to those individuals responsible for monitoring and maintenance of the system. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44367 Based on observations and interviews with the facility’s staff, the Facility Administrator and Medical Director failed to ensure the water purification and storage systems was secure at all times. This failure had the potential to place all patients at potential risk of harm. Findings include: During the flash tour of the facility on 04/24/2024 at 10:15 a.m., the surveyor noted the water treatment room did not have a door, gate, or the ability to secure the water treatment system. The water treatment room and the supply room are separated by a wall with an opening which will allow unauthorized individuals, such as delivery personnel access to the water system. The Facility Administrator was asked by the surveyor if all delivery personnel is accompanied by the facility personnel for the duration of the delivery. The Facility Administrator corroborated that the delivery personnel is not supervised for the duration of the delivery. The Facility Administrator and Regional Operations Director were informed of the findings on 04/24/2024.”
-
Pe - Building - Constructed/Maintained To Ensure Safety
The inspectors’ words, 163 words
“PE-BUILDING-CONSTRUCT/MAINTAIN FOR SAFETY CFR(s): 494.60(a) The building in which dialysis services are furnished must be constructed and maintained to ensure the safety of the patients, the staff and the public. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44367 Based on observations and interviews with the facility’s administration, the governing body failed to ensure that the water treatment room and supply room were kept clean at all times. This failure placed the patients, staff and visitors at potential risk of harm including injury or infection. Findings included: On 05/24/202 at 10:20 a.m., during the flash tour of the water room and supply room area, the surveyor observed the following: A gross amount of white colored crystallization build up at the base and the black spout of the 2.0 K 2.5 CA and the 3.0 K 2.5 CA holding tanks and gross amount of small in size debris throughout the supply room floor. The Facility Administrator was informed and observed the findings on 04/24/2024.”
-
Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu
The inspectors’ words, 233 words
“PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44367 Based on observations and a review of the facility’s policies and procedures, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure that all ancillary equipment checks were performed as required and the facility was free of expired supplies. This failure placed the patients at potential risk of harm. Findings include: On 09/24/2024, observation of the laboratory area revealed, nineteen (19) navy blue Vacuette Tubes blood tubes, lot number B22103HY expired 04/10/2024. Review on 04/25/2024 of the facility’s policy #C-Forms-0401 entitled “Medication and Laboratory Refrigerator Temperature Log” states, “Monitoring frequently: 1) Medication Refrigerator: twice daily.” Inspection of the medication refrigeration logs on 05/25/2024 revealed the refrigerators temperature is to be checked in the morning and the evening. When no documentation is present, it is an indication that the refrigerators temperatures were not monitored on the following days: Refrigerator labeled “Med #1” the section “PM” was blank on 02/02/2024, 02/16/2024, 02/22/2024 and 03/25/2024. Refrigerator labeled “Med #2” the section “PM” was blank on 02/16/2024. On 02/03/2024 and 04/13/2024, both sections labeled “AM” and “PM” were left blank. The Facility Administrator was informed of the findings on 04/25/2024”
-
Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx
The inspectors’ words, 365 words
“PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44367 Based on review of the dialysis patients’ treatment flowsheets, the facility’s administration and clinical staff failed to ensure that the dialysis prescriptions were the same as what the patients received. Failure to ensure that the dialysis prescription was implemented according to the Nephrologist’s orders placed the patients at potential risk of harm, injury and denied the patients their rights. Patients: #2 Findings included: In order to have an effective dialysis treatment, the Blood Flow Rate (BFR) and the Dialysate Flow Rate (DFR) must be accurate and reflect the doctor’s prescription. The staff member must verify that the rate on the readout is correct. The BFR and DFR are part of the order for treatment; there could be a “sliding scale” guide or protocol for adjusting the BFR. If not, there would need to be an order for the change. If the staff is not able to achieve the ordered BFR or DFR, the record should address this issue, including the date and time that this problem was communicated to the physician. Review on 04/15/2024 of the facility’s policy #C-Tl-0010 entitled “Initiation of Dialysis Treatment” revealed that “Prior to walking away from patient’s machine, verify all prescribed orders are followed. If unable to follow any part of the patient’s prescription after troubleshooting, notify the charge nurse and document notification. Charge nurse will notify the physician if indicated and document any follow up or new orders.” A review of four (4) selected patients’ treatment flowsheets on 04/24/2024 revealed that one (1) out of the four (4) or 25% of the selected patients did not receive the correct dialysis prescription, as ordered by the Nephrologist. 1. On treatment date 04/15/2024, Patient #2’s BFR was prescribed for 450 ml/min.; however, the BFR was set at 400 ml/min from 10:33 a.m. to 02:24 p.m. There was no documentation found explaining why Patient #2’s BFR was not set on the dialysis machine as prescribed. The Facility Administrator was informed of the findings on 04/24/2024.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2024 | Standard inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Aug 22, 2014.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: US Renal Care, Inc.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 16 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the US Renal Care, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 46 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Prince Georges County, 42 have a star rating from CMS: 6 rated 5 of 5, 10 rated 4 of 5, 18 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.