Davita Frederick Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Frederick, Maryland 21702
140 Thomas Johnson Dr, Ste 100, Frederick, Maryland 21702. (301) 695-0900.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 27 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 3, 2024: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 18, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
-
Environment: Access To Ports/Meters
The inspectors’ words, 200 words
“ENVIRONMENT-ACCESS TO PORTS/METERS CFR(s): 494.40(a) 8 Environment: access to ports/meters The layout of the water purification system should provide easy access to all components of the system, including all meters, gauges, and sampling ports used for monitoring system performance. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure easy access to all components of the system such as: (1) water pressure gauges and (2) water valves. This failure placed the water system at risk for possible damage that may affect patient care. Findings Included: According to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI/AAMI RD52:2004), the layout of the water purification system should provide easy access to all components of the system, including all meters, gauges, and sampling ports used for monitoring system performance. On 01/12/2024, at 02:42 p.m., during observations of the water room, the surveyor observed stacks of water softener pellets adjacent to the secondary carbon tank blocking the G1, H1, and H2 valve as well as the P4 pressure gauge. At 02:45 p.m., during interviews, the Facility Administrator corroborated that all components of the water system should be easily accessible and not blocked by any items.”
-
Pe - Building - Constructed/Maintained To Ensure Safety
The inspectors’ words, 374 words
“PE-BUILDING-CONSTRUCT/MAINTAIN FOR SAFETY CFR(s): 494.60(a) The building in which dialysis services are furnished must be constructed and maintained to ensure the safety of the patients, the staff and the public. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on observations and staff interviews, the governing body failed to ensure an environment free from defects or hazards in order to maintain safety and functionality. This failure placed the patients, staff and visitors at potential risk of harm including injury or infection. Findings included: On 01/19/2024 at 10:30 a.m., during review of the facility’s policies and procedures titled “Physical Environment” (Policy: 08-04-01) page 1 number 1 states “The dialysis facility will be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, teammates, and the public safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment.” Number 2 states “The building in which dialysis services are furnished will be constructed and maintained for the safety of the patients, the teammates, and the public.” On 01/12/2024, at 11:45 a.m.-12:00 p.m., during inspection of the treatment floor, the surveyor observed the following: 1.Blue, black, white residues surrounding the strainer assembly of the faucet as well as brown residues surrounding the basin of the sink located at the back portion of the treatment floor near stations #22 and #23. During interviews, the Facility Administrator (FA) corroborated that the sink does need to be replaced. 2. One part of the cabinet handle dangling and unattached located across station #16. During interviews, Staff #1 corroborated that the cabinet needs an upgrade. 3. Peeling laminate countertop across Station #3 as well as peeling laminate countertop near stations #22 and #23. During interviews, the Facility Administrator (FA) corroborated that the countertop needs to be fixed as it poses an infection control concern. On 01/12/2024, at 02:42 p.m., during inspection of the water room, the surveyor observed the following: 1. Brown and white crystallization surrounding the pipe on the wall connected to the storage tank. 2. Brown residue surrounding the floor near the water heater. 3. White crystallization surrounding the granuflo dissolution unit. 4. Gross amount of black and gray residue all throughout the floor of the water room 5. Gross amount of white crystallization underneath the sink located between the water room and the storage room.”
-
Va Monitor To Prevent Failure/Stenosis
The inspectors’ words, 241 words
“POC-VA MONITOR/PREVENT FAILURE/STENOSIS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(5) The patient’s vascular access must be monitored to prevent access failure, including monitoring of arteriovenous grafts and fistulae for symptoms of stenosis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on observations and review of the facility’s policies and procedures, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure that the clinical staff complied with the facility’s implemented infection control protocol. This failure placed the safety and wellbeing of the patients at potential risk of harm in maintaining their vascular access. Staff: # 5 Findings included: According to the facility’s policies and procedures titled “AV Fistula or Graft Cannulation with Nipro Or Medsystems Safety Fistula Needles (SFN) And Administration of Heparin Loading Dose” page 3 number 13 states “Once the access site has been prepped, touching it will contaminate the site and possibly allow for the introduction of bacteria during cannulation.” On 01/12/2024, during observations of the treatment floor, the surveyor observed the following: 1. At 10:18 a.m., during observation of the clinical staffs’ practice, the surveyor observed Staff #5 cleansed the access site of patient at station #12 [Patient J], then touched the patient’s skin prior to cannulation without disinfecting the access site again. 2. At 10:43 a.m., during observation of the clinical staff’s practice, the surveyor observed Staff #5 cleansed the access site of patient at station #13 [Patient K], then touched the patient’s skin prior to cannulation without disinfecting the access site again.”
-
Staff # & Ratio Meet Patient Needs
The inspectors’ words, 309 words
“GOV-STAFF # & RATIO MEET PT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.180(b)(1) The governing body or designated person responsible must ensure that- (1) An adequate number of qualified personnel are present whenever patients are undergoing dialysis so that the patient/staff ratio is appropriate to the level of dialysis care given and meets the needs of patients; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on record review and staff interviews, the governing body failed to ensure an adequate number of qualified and trained staff to meet the needs of the patients. This failure placed the patients at potential risk and denied their rights to a minimum standard of medical care. Findings Include: The Code of Maryland Regulations 10.05.04.06C (Dialysis Monitoring for Freestanding Kidney Dialysis Centers) states: (a) In-Center Daytime Hemodialysis. When in-center daytime hemodialysis is performed, the monitoring individual-to-patient ratio at each center shall be: (i) A minimum of one staff member to three participants; and (ii) Sufficient to meet the needs of patients. ... (c) The center shall establish provisions for back-up staff coverage during unexpected illnesses, vacations, and holidays. (d) The charge nurse may not be included in the staffing ratio except: (i) When there are nine or fewer patients; or (ii) In the event of an emergency. 1.On 01/18/2023 at 09:45 a.m., a review of the facility’s staffing exception report from December through January 2024 revealed that staffing ratios did not meet the requirements on the following dates: a. December 2023: 11, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28 b. January 2024: 2, 8, 9, and 10 In all instances, the charge nurse was either included in the staffing ratio or had to monitor patients. 2. On 01/18/2023, interviews with the Facility Administrator revealed that despite the inadequate staffing for December, the facility recently accepted two additional patients for the month of January.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 18, 2024 | Standard inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 1, 1989.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 27 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (49 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 79% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Frederick County, 4 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Fresenius Kidney Care Frederick | 3 |
| Davita Ballenger Creek Dialysis | 4 |
| Davita Ridge Road Dialysis | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.