Hearth Record

Davita Ellicott City Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Ellicott City, Maryland 21042

3419 Plum Tree Drive, Ste 103, Ellicott City, Maryland 21042. (410) 750-8071.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 16, 2024: a standard inspection.

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 16, 2024: standard inspection8 deficiencies
  • Ic - Sanitary Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 305 words

    “IC-SANITARY ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.30 The dialysis facility must provide and monitor a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents within and between the unit and any adjacent hospital or other public areas. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on observations and review of the facility’s policies and procedure, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure a sanitary environment at all times. This failure placed the patients and the staff at potential risk for exposure to infectious diseases through cross contamination. Findings Included: On 05/16/2024 at 07:30 a.m., during review of the facility’s policies and procedures titled “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities (Policy 1-05-01) page 1 number 1 letter b and d states, “all teammates will perform hand hygiene prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves. All teammates will perform hand hygiene after patient and dialysis delivery system contact “Page 5 number 19 letter b states “Clean supplies or equipment will not be placed adjacent to a sink unless a splash guard is in place.” On 05/14/2024, during observation of the treatment floor, the surveyor observed the following: 1. At 10:15 a.m., Staff #2 (1) did not practice hand hygiene after direct patient care and after removal of gloves (2) did not wear gloves prior to touching machine number 6, a machine that was currently being used and therefore considered contaminated and (3) did not practice hand hygiene prior to gloves being put on. 2. At 12:07 p.m., a partially opened jug, which according to Staff #2 was drinking water for the patients, was observed located in the “clean sink” area where staff members were observed washing their hands and where cross contamination may occur. 3. At 12:08 p.m., a sink was observed located approximately 1 ft away from the medication preparation area where cross contamination may occur.”

    Rule V0111. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area

    The inspectors’ words, 308 words

    “IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on observations and review of the facility’s policies and procedure, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure that personal protective equipment (PPE)s are (1) worn in the treatment area and removed prior to leaving the treatment areas and (2) followed as to protect facility staff members from needle stick injuries. This failure posed a risk of exposure to infectious diseases and blood borne pathogens to other staff members, as well as patients. Findings Included: On 05/16/2024 at 07:30a.m., during record review of the facility ’ s policy titled “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities” (Policy 1-05-01) page 2 number 5 states “Appropriate PPE will be worn whenever there is the potential for contact with body fluids, hazardous chemicals, contaminated equipment and environmental surfaces .... PPE is to be: a. Removed prior to leaving the treatment area.” According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, in an environment where an employee is at risk for foot injuries, employees must wear footwear that protects them from foot injuries. 1. On 05/14/2024 at 11:09 a.m. during observations of the clinical treatment floor, the surveyor observed holes in Staff #5’s footwear exposing the employee’s feet to injury from dropped contaminated needles and sharps. 2. On 05/14/2024 at 09:44 a.m., during observations of the clinical treatment floor, the surveyor observed Staff #6 with a white/lab coat which was not removed prior to leaving the treatment floor.”

    Rule V0115. Standard-level.

  • Environment: Access To Ports/Meters

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “ENVIRONMENT-ACCESS TO PORTS/METERS CFR(s): 494.40(a) 8 Environment: access to ports/meters The layout of the water purification system should provide easy access to all components of the system, including all meters, gauges, and sampling ports used for monitoring system performance. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on observations, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure easy access to all components of the system such as: (1) meter and (2) water valves. This failure placed the water system at risk for possible damage that may affect patient care. Findings Included: According to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI/AAMI RD52:2004), the layout of the water purification system should provide easy access to all components of the system, including all meters, gauges and sampling ports used for monitoring system performance. On 05/14/2024 at 01:16 p.m., during observations of the water room, the surveyor observed that several jugs of Naturalyte 2K 2.5 Ca jugs were piled on top of a black pellet that was blocking the back flow preventer valve, 2 meter gauges, and the D.I. monitoring system. This observation was observed and confirmed by Staff #1.”

    Rule V0185. Standard-level.

  • Softeners - Automatically Regenerated/Timers/Salt/Salt Level

    The inspectors’ words, 393 words

    “SOFTENERS-AUTO REGENERATE/TIMERS/SALT LVL CFR(s): 494.40(a) 5.2.4 Softeners: auto regen/timers/salt/salt level Prior to exhaustion, softeners should be restored; that is, new exchangeable sodium ions are placed on the resin by a process known as “regeneration,” which involves exposure of the resin bed to a saturated sodium chloride solution. 5.2.4 Softeners Refer to RD62:2001, 4.3.10 Automatically regenerated water softeners: Automatically regenerated water softeners shall be fitted with a mechanism to prevent water containing the high concentrations of sodium chloride used during regeneration from entering the product water line during regeneration. The face of the timers used to control the regeneration cycle should be visible to the user. 6.2.4 Softeners Timers should be checked at the beginning of each day and should be interlocked with the RO system so that the RO is stopped when a softener regeneration cycle is initiated. The softener brine tank should be monitored daily to ensure that a saturated salt solution exists in the brine tank. Salt pellets should fill at least half the tank. Salt designated as rock salt should not be used for softener regeneration since it is not refined and typically contains sediments and other impurities that may damage O-rings and pistons and clog orifices in the softener control head. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure that enough sodium chloride is inside the brine tank. This failure placed the patients at potential risk of harm by potentially causing damage in the reverse osmosis (RO) machine. Findings Included: The major purpose of softeners in hemodialysis water systems is to keep hard water deposits from damaging delicate reverse osmosis membranes. A reverse osmosis (RO) system is the primary method for purifying water for dialysis treatments, ensuring patients receive safe, clean water. According to the manufacturer’s Directions for Use (DFU) posted on the facility’s brine tank, the staff must “verify salt level is above water level in the brine tank. As needed, add salt to the brine tank & record salt addition on daily log.” On 05/14/2024, during observations of the water room, the surveyor observed that (1) the salt level was filled less than 1/2 of the brine tank and (2) was below water level. Staff #1 corroborated that the salt level should be above the water level as stated on the DFU.”

    Rule V0190. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 511 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on observations and review of the facility’s policies and procedures, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure an environment free from defects or hazards in order to maintain safety and functionality.This failure placed the patients, staff and visitors at potential risk of harm including injury or infection. Findings included: On 05/16/2024 at 07:30 a.m., during review of the facility’s policies and procedures titled “Physical Environment” (Policy: 08-04-01) page 1 number 1 states, “The dialysis facility will be designed, constructed, equipped and maintained to provide dialysis patients, teammates and the public safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment.” Number 2 states “The building in which dialysis services are furnished will be constructed and maintained for the safety of the patients, the teammates, and the public.” On 05/14/2024, during inspection of the treatment floor, the surveyor observed the following: 1. At 11:40 a.m., the surveyor observed tears on the dialysis chairs located in stations #1, #5, #9, and the isolation room. 2. At 11:45 a.m.,the surveyor observed peeling wallpaper adjacent to Station #17. 3. At 11:50 a.m., the surveyor observed: a. A non functional sink adjacent to the weighing scale. b. Loose handle bar located at the bottom cabinet of the lab area. On 05/14/2024, interviews with staff and patients revealed the following: 1. Interviews with 4 out of the 6 patients 67% [G, C, H, and K] revealed that there are problems with the patients’ chairside television a. As an example, according to Patient H “TV does not work. It sucks. The TV is not clear. TV needs to be replaced or be maintenanced. If you’re sitting here a long time, you’ve got to do something.” i. To follow up on this complaint, staff #4 was interviewed and it was revealed that this issue was a known issue by the facility. According to Staff #4, TV monitors in stations #4, #6, #7, #11, #13, #15, and #16 malfunction frequently. 2. Interviews with patients [G and C] states that machine tests fail and cause delay in treatment. a. As an example, according to Patient C, “Sometimes I have to miss some or part of my treatment because machine tests fail and I have to be out on time due to transportation.” i. To follow up on this complaint, 4 staff members were interviewed. 4 out of 4 staff members [Staff #4, #6, #7, and #8] corroborated that machines have been problematic in which the test fails the first time almost all the time and at times cause delay in treatment. This problem according to the staff members have been brought up to Staff #1. ii. Interview with Staff #1 revealed that he/she was aware of the problem that staff members were claiming, and corroborated that no investigation or inquiry to the manufacturer about the known problem has been discussed or documented until the surveyor’s arrival.”

    Rule V0401. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility’s governing body failed to have the preventative maintenance completed prior to the due date thereby failing to ensure that all equipment were in functional working condition. This failure placed the patients and staff at potential risk of harm Findings included: On 05/14/2024 at 12:00 p.m., during inspection of the facility ’ s ancillary equipment, the surveyor observed that the following have not had their preventative maintenance due 05/10/2024. 1. Weighing scale serial number (SN) H1301 2. Lab Centrifuge: SN: P1438 and GM140 3. IV Pumps: SN: D15000, SN: A16563, and SN: B11349 4. Concentrators: SN: GD4054, GD4053, A16667, and P1010 5. AED: SN: G2675”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

  • Va Monitor To Prevent Failure/Stenosis

    The inspectors’ words, 342 words

    “POC-VA MONITOR/PREVENT FAILURE/STENOSIS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(5) The patient’s vascular access must be monitored to prevent access failure, including monitoring of arteriovenous grafts and fistulae for symptoms of stenosis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on observations and review of the facility’s policies and procedures, the facility’s governing body failed to ensure that the clinical staff complied with the facility’s implemented infection control protocol. This failure placed the safety and wellbeing of the patients at potential risk of harm in maintaining their vascular access. Findings included: On 05/16/2024 at 07:30 a.m., during review of the facility’s policies and procedures titled “Cannulation of Fistula or Graft”, (Procedure 01-04-01E) Page 3 number 12 states “apply alcohol using a circular rubbing motion, center out for 60 seconds and allow to dry for 15 seconds prior to cannulation.” Page 3 number 13 states: “Do not palpate insertion site once area has been prepped. Rationale: Once the access site has been prepped, touching it will contaminate the site and possibly allow for the introduction of bacteria during cannulation.” On 05/14/2024, during observation of the treatment floor, the surveyor observed the following: 1. At 10:53 a.m., during AVF/AVG treatment initiation, the surveyor observed Staff #2 disinfect the access site of [Patient in station #12] for 10 seconds and then touched the access site several times prior to cannulation without disinfecting the access site again. 2. At 11:18 a.m., during AVF/AVG treatment initiation, the surveyor observed Staff #3 disinfect the access site of [Patient in station #16], placed his/her stethoscope to auscultate, and then touched the access site several times prior to cannulation without disinfecting the access site again. 3. At 11:30 a.m., during AVF/AVG treatment initiation, the surveyor observed Staff #2 disinfect the access site of [Patient in station #10] for 9 seconds and then touched the access site several times prior to cannulation without disinfecting the access site again. On 05/15/2024, during AVF/AVG treatment initiation, the surveyor observed Staff #4 disinfect the access site of [Patient in station #14] for 7 seconds total and cannulated.”

    Rule V0551. Standard-level.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 495 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47759 Based on a review of the facility’s policies and procedures, the medical director and the facility’s administration failed to ensure that the staff adhered to their own policies and procedures. This failure posed a potential risk of safety to the patients, and denied patients their rights to a minimum standard of medical care. Findings included: 1. “Machine Start Up and Priming a Single Use Dialyzer Utilizing Fresenius 2008 Series Dialysis Delivery Systems and Streamline BloodLines for First Shift of the Day” (Policy 1-03-06Q) indicates that the pH has to be checked before the connection of hansen lines to the dialysate lines. See step by step procedure below: a. page 9 number 43 states, “Check independent pH with approved test method for final dialysate” number 44 states, “document these numeric values in the patient ’ s electronic treatment record or flowsheet.” Number 45 states, “Open shunt door and attach dialysate lines to dialyzer verifying that the red colored hansen is connected to the arterial end of the dialyzer and the blue colored hansen is connected to the venous end of the dialyzer, Close shunt door. 2. “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities (Policy 1-05-01) page 1 number 1 letter b and d states, “all teammates will perform hand hygiene prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves. All teammates will perform hand hygiene after patient and dialysis delivery system contact “Page 5 number 19 letter b states “Clean supplies or equipment will not be placed adjacent to a sink unless a splash guard is in place.” 3. “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities” (Policy 1-05-01) page 2 number 5 states “Appropriate PPE will be worn whenever there is the potential for contact with body fluids, hazardous chemicals, contaminated equipment and environmental surfaces .... PPE is to be: a. Removed prior to leaving the treatment area.” 4. “Physical Environment” (Policy: 08-04-01) page 1 number 1 states, “The dialysis facility will be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, teammates, and the public safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment.” Number 2 states “The building in which dialysis services are furnished will be constructed and maintained for the safety of the patients, the teammates, and the public.” 5. “Cannulation of Fistula or Graft”, (Procedure 01-04-01E) Page 3 number 12 states “apply alcohol using a circular rubbing motion, center out for 60 seconds and allow to dry for 15 seconds prior to cannulation.” Page 3 number 13 states: “Do not palpate insertion site once area has been prepped. Rationale: Once the access site has been prepped, touching it will contaminate the site and possibly allow for the introduction of bacteria during cannulation.””

    Rule V0715. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 16, 2024Standard inspection8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 25, 1995.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 18 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (31 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 73% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Howard County, 4 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.