Hearth Record

Fmc - Dialysis of Mayfield

A dialysis facility in Mayfield, Kentucky 42066

1029 Medical Center Circle Ste 301, Mayfield, Kentucky 42066. (270) 247-7291.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 30, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 18, 2024: complaint and standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx

    The inspectors’ words, 916 words

    “PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the individualized dialysis prescription as prescribed by the medical provider for 5 (Patients #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) of 5 sampled patients. Failure to follow the medical providers’ dialysis prescription had the potential to negatively impact the effectiveness of the prescribed dialysis treatments for the 42 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. The findings include: A facility policy titled, “Physician Order Documentation,” published 07/03/2023, indicated, “Nurse practice acts require nurses to carry out treatment care, medication administration, lab tests, procedures, and other treatments, based on physician orders.” 1. Patient #1’s treatment sheet dated 11/20/2024 revealed a prescribed blood flow rate (BFR) of 450 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and a prescribed dialysate flow rate (DFR) of 800 mL/min. Patient #1’s BFR was documented as 350 mL/min from 10:01 AM until the treatment was terminated at 1:43 PM, and the DFR was documented between 100 mL/min and 500 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed BFR and DFR were not achieved. Patient #1’s treatment sheet dated 11/24/2024 revealed a prescribed DFR of 800 mL/min. Patient #1’s DFR was documented as 700 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed DFR was not achieved. Patient #1’s treatment sheet dated 11/29/2024 revealed a prescribed DFR of 800 mL/min. Patient #1’s DFR was documented as 700 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed DFR was not achieved. 2. Patient #2’s treatment sheet dated 11/27/2024 revealed a prescribed blood flow rate (BFR) of 450 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and a prescribed dialysate flow rate (DFR) of 800 mL/min. Patient #2’s BFR was documented as 425 mL/min from 2:32 PM until 3:04 PM. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed BFR and DFR were not achieved. Patient #2’s treatment sheet dated 12/07/2024 revealed a prescribed DFR of 800 mL/min. Patient #2’s DFR was documented as 700 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed DFR was not achieved. Patient #2’s treatment sheet dated 12/10/2024 revealed a prescribed BFR of 450 mL/min. Patient #2’s BFR was documented as 260 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed BFR was not achieved. 3. Patient #3’s treatment sheet dated 11/26/2024 revealed a prescribed dialysate flow rate (DFR) of 800 mL/min. Patient #3’s DFR was documented as 700 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed DFR was not achieved. Patient #3’s treatment sheet dated 12/02/2024 revealed a prescribed blood flow rate (BFR) of 400 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and a prescribed DFR of 800 mL/min. Patient #3’s BFR was documented between 375 mL/min and 380 mL/min, and the DFR was documented as 700 mL/min the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed BFR and DFR were not achieved. 4. Patient #4’s treatment sheet dated 12/03/2024 revealed a prescribed dialysate flow rate (DFR) of 700 mL/min. Patient #4’s DFR was documented as 800 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed DFR was not achieved. Patient #4’s treatment sheet dated 12/07/2024 revealed a prescribed blood flow rate (BFR) of 450 milliliters per minute (mL/min). Patient #4’s BFR was documented as 400 mL/min from 7:05 AM until the treatment was terminated at 9:11 AM. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed BFR was not achieved. Patient #4’s treatment sheet dated 12/10/2024 revealed a prescribed BFR of 450 mL/min. Patient #4’s BFR was documented as 400 mL/min from 7:31 AM until the treatment was terminated at 9:01 AM. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed BFR was not achieved. 5. Patient #5’s treatment sheet dated 11/19/2024 revealed a prescribed blood flow rate (BFR) of 600 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and a prescribed dialysate flow rate (DFR) of 1.5 times the BFR (600 mL/min x 1.5 = 900 mL/min). Patient #5’s DFR was documented as 500 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed DFR was not achieved. Patient #5’s treatment sheet dated 11/21/2024 revealed a prescribed BFR of 600 mL/min. Patient #5’s BFR was documented as 565 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed BFR was not achieved. Patient #5’s treatment sheet dated 11/30/2024 revealed a prescribed BFR of 600 mL/min. Patient #5’s BFR was documented as 450 mL/min during the entire treatment. There was no rationale documented why the prescribed BFR was not achieved. During an interview on 12/17/2024 at 1:15 PM, the Clinical Manager stated, “We are supposed to” document reasons when the prescribed BFR and/or DFR were not achieved. During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 9:55 AM, Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician #4 stated she was expected to document the reason when the prescribed BFR and/or DFR were not achieved. During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 10:05 AM, Registered Nurse #3 stated she was expected to document a rationale when the prescribed BFR and/or DFR were not achieved. During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 11:17 AM, the Medical Director stated documentation was “very important,” and staff were expected to document reasons for changes to the prescribed BFR and/or DFR.”

    Rule V0503. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 786 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor patients’ vital signs and/or machine parameters according to the expectations in their policy for 5 (Patients #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) of 5 sampled patients. Failure to monitor patients’ vitals and/or machine parameters according to the facility’s policy provided an opportunity for changes to the patients’ condition during dialysis treatments to be unrecognized and unaddressed and negatively impact the care provided to the 42 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. The findings include: A facility policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” published 05/01/2023, indicated, “During Treatment * Obtain blood pressure and pulse rate every 30 minutes or more as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations. * Document machine parameters and safety checks every 30 minutes or more often as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations.” 1. Patient #1’s treatment sheet, dated 11/20/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 152 minutes, from 10:01 AM until 12:33 PM. Patient #1’s treatment sheet, dated 11/22/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 66 minutes, from 11:04 AM until 12:10 PM. Patient #1’s treatment sheet, dated 11/24/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 63 minutes, from 10:03 AM until 12:06 PM. 2. Patient #2’s treatment sheet, dated 11/30/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 66 minutes, from 10:31 AM until 11:37 AM and for 61 minutes from 12:31 PM until 1:32 PM. Patient #2’s treatment sheet, dated 12/07/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 59 minutes, from 10:38 AM until 11:37 AM. Patient #2’s treatment sheet, dated 12/10/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 69 minutes, from 12:32 PM until 1:41 PM. Patient #2’s treatment sheet, dated 12/12/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 59 minutes, from 10:38 AM until 11:37 AM and for 93 minutes from 12:37 PM until the treatment was terminated at 2:10 PM. Patient #2’s treatment sheet, dated 12/14/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 52 minutes, from 11:09 AM until 12:01 PM and for 59 minutes from 1:04 PM until 2:03 PM. 3. Patient #3’s treatment sheet, dated 11/29/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 63 minutes, from 12:02 PM until 1:05 PM. Patient #3’s treatment sheet, dated 12/02/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 66 minutes, from 1:30 PM until 2:36 PM. Patient #3’s treatment sheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed monitoring for vitals was not documented for 61 minutes, from 11:27 AM until 12:38 PM and for machine parameters for 51 minutes, from 11:47 AM until 12:38 PM. Patient #3’s treatment sheet, dated 12/06/2024, revealed monitoring for vitals was not documented for 60 minutes, from 1:03 PM until 2:03 PM, for machine parameters for 53 minutes from 1:03 PM until 1:56 PM, and for both vitals and machine parameters for 50 minutes from 2:03 PM until the treatment was terminated at 2:53 PM. Patient #3’s treatment sheet, dated 12/13/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 51 minutes, from 11:48 AM until 12:39 PM and for another 51 minutes from 2:08 PM until 2:59 PM. 4. Patient #4’s treatment sheet, dated 11/30/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 48 minutes, from 8:04 AM until 8:52 AM. Patient #4’s treatment sheet, dated 12/05/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 48 minutes, from 6:14 AM until 7:02 AM. Patient #4’s treatment sheet, dated 12/12/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 48 minutes, from 6:26 AM until 7:14 AM and for 57 minutes from 7:40 AM until 8:37 AM. Patient #4’s treatment sheet, dated 12/14/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 70 minutes, from 8:08 AM until the treatment was terminated at 9:18 AM. 5. Patient #5’s treatment sheet, dated 11/30/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 60 minutes, from 8:05 AM until 9:05 AM. Patient #5’s treatment sheet, dated 12/11/2024, revealed monitoring was not documented for 52 minutes, from 8:31 AM until 9:23 AM. During an interview on 12/17/2024 at 1:30 PM, the Clinical Manager stated documentation of patient monitoring was expected “every half hour.” During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 9:55 AM, Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician #4 stated she was expected to document patient monitoring “every 30 minutes.” During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 10:05 AM, Registered Nurse #3 stated she was expected to document patient monitoring every 30 minutes. During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 11:17 AM, the Medical Director confirmed documentation of patient monitoring was expected “every 30 minutes or more [frequently].””

    Rule V0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 30, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 18, 2024Complaint and standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 23, 1996.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 13 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Graves County.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.