Hearth Record

Fmc - Pikeville

A dialysis facility in Pikeville, Kentucky 41501

146 Adams Lane, Pikeville, Kentucky 41501. (606) 432-1707.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 29, 2024: a standard inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 29, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 725 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 4 (Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technicians [CCHT] #6, #7, and #9, and Registered Nurse [RN] #3) of 7 observed staff performed hand hygiene after removing gloves and before touching patient care equipment (dialysis machine, blood pressure cuff). Failure to perform hand hygiene provided a mode of cross contamination with the potential spread of pathogens, which could negatively impact the health and well-being of the 63 patients who received dialysis treatments and/or home therapy oversight at the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, “Hand Hygiene,” published 11/06/2023, indicated, “The table below identifies when hands shall be washed specifically with soap and water or when alcohol-based hand rubs can be used.” In part, the table identified that, immediately after removing gloves and/or when entering and leaving the treatment area, hands were to be “Decontaminated using alcohol-based hand rub or by washing hands with antimicrobial soap and water.” Observations of the dialysis treatment area on 08/28/2024 with the Clinical Manager (CM) revealed the following: - At 10:02 AM, CCHT #7 was observed exiting Station 3 while wearing a pair of gloves. CCHT #7 removed the pair of gloves and adjusted her personal protective equipment (PPE) face shield. - At 10:09 AM, CCHT #7 was observed obtaining patient care supplies from a common storage area while wearing a pair of gloves. CCHT #7 entered Station 3, placed the supplies on the chairside table, and touched the dialysis machine. - At 10:22 AM, CCHT #6 was observed in a designated dirty area while wearing a pair of gloves. CCHT #6 exited the designated dirty area, entered Station 14, and touched the dialysis machine. - At 10:24 AM, CCHT #9 was observed exiting Station 10 while wearing a pair of gloves. CCHT #9 removed the pair of gloves and obtained and applied a new pair of gloves. CCHT #9 entered Station 10 and touched the dialysis machine. - At 11:05 AM, CCHT #9 was observed obtaining a cup from a common storage area while wearing a pair of gloves. CCHT #9 entered Station 1 and touched the dialysis machine. - At 11:07 AM, CCHT #9 was observed exiting Station 2 while wearing a pair of gloves. CCHT #9 removed the pair of gloves and obtained and applied a new pair of gloves. CCHT #9 entered Station 1 and touched the blood pressure cuff. Observation of the water purification and storage area on 08/28/2024 with the Biomedical Technician revealed the following: - At 3:55 PM, CCHT #6 and RN #3 were observed performing a water test while each wore a pair of gloves. After performing the water test, CCHT #6 and RN #3 removed their gloves and prepared to leave the area. When interviewed immediately after performing the water test, CCHT #6 and RN #3 confirmed there was no hand hygiene (sanitizer and/or hand washing sink) available for use in the water purification and storage area. During an interview on 08/28/2024 at 11:08 AM, CCHT #6 confirmed he did not remove his pair of gloves and perform hand hygiene after exiting the designated dirty area before entering Station 14 and before touching the dialysis machine. CCHT #6 confirmed he was trained and expected to perform hand hygiene before touching patient care equipment. During an interview on 08/28/2024 at 11:17 AM, CCHT #9 confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene after removing her pair of gloves and before touching the dialysis machine. CCHT #9 confirmed she was trained and expected to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and before touching patient care equipment. During an interview on 08/28/2024 at 12:00 PM, the CM confirmed staff were trained and expected to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and before touching patient care equipment. During an interview on 08/28/2024 at 6:29 PM, CCHT #7 confirmed she was trained and expected to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and before touching patient care equipment. During an interview on 08/29/2024 at 10:05 AM, the Medical Director confirmed staff should perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and before touching patient care equipment.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Hbv - Isolation Of Machines/Equipment/Supplies

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “IC-HBV-ISOLATION-MACHINES/EQUIP/SUPPLIES CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Isolation of HBV+ Patients To isolate HBsAg positive patients, ... dedicate machines, equipment, instruments, supplies, and medications that will not be used by HBV susceptible patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to dedicate and label all equipment and supplies used to care for dialysis patients positive for bloodborne pathogens in 1 of 1 isolation room. Failure to dedicate and label equipment and supplies used when treating dialysis patients requiring bloodborne pathogen isolation had the potential to provide a mode for cross-contamination and the potential spread of bloodborne pathogens and negatively impact the well-being of the 63 patients who received dialysis treatments and/or home therapy oversight at the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled “Dialyzing Patients with Positive Hepatitis B Antigen (HBsAg+),” published 11/06/2023, indicated, “All supplies used in the isolation room/area such as clamps, blood pressure cuffs, testing reagents, etc., should be labeled ‘isolation’ and not routinely removed.” An observation of the isolation room on 08/28/2024 at 7:55 PM with the Clinical Manager (CM) revealed the following unlabeled and undedicated items: two boxes of gloves, a dialysis chair, and a bottle of bleach. During an interview on 08/28/2024 at 7:55 PM, the CM confirmed the listed items in the isolation room were unlabeled and undedicated. The CM stated the items should be labeled and dedicated for use only in the isolation room. During an interview on 08/29/2024 at 10:05 AM, the Medical Director confirmed all items in the isolation room should be labeled and dedicated for use only in the isolation room.”

    Rule V0130. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 548 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, interview, manufacturer’s directions for use (DFU) review, and facility procedure review, the facility failed to follow the bloodline manufacturer’s DFU during dialysis treatments by not maintaining the arterial drip chamber fluid levels at 85% - 95% full and the venous drip chamber fluid levels at 65% - 75% full during 3 of 3 observations. Failure to follow the bloodline manufacturer’s DFU had the potential to result in equipment malfunction and/or failure and negatively impact the safety and wellbeing of the 49 patients who received in-center dialysis treatments at the facility. Findings included: A facility procedure titled, “Priming an Optiflux Single Use E-beam Dialyzer,” published 06/28/2024, indicated, “Fill the Pre-pump arterial chamber: Vent the chamber by loosening the cap and opening the clamp on the level adjust line. Fill chamber 85%-95% full and tighten cap. “ Further review indicated, “Fill the venous chamber: Vent the chamber by loosening the cap and opening the clamp on the level adjust line. Fill chamber 65%-75% full.” The manufacturer’s DFU titled, “CombiSet True Flow Series Hemodialysis Blood Tubing Set with Priming Set and Transducer Protectors,” indicated, “During Treatment a. Periodically check the extracorporeal circuit for any evidence of possible Separation [sic] or leaks. b. Maintain fluid level in pre-pump arterial chamber at 85 to 95% full, post-pump arterial and venous chambers at 65 to 75% full. Levels may rise or drop during the treatment due to changes in pressure or flow rate. Readjust levels as needed. Air Leaks [sic] will also cause the chamber levels to fluctuate.” Observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 08/26/2024 at 11:35 AM, revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were less than (<) 85% full in Stations 2, 6, 7, 9, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, and 21, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were greater than (>) 75% full in Stations 2, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 18, and 19. Observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 08/28/2024 at 10:01 AM, revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 85% full in Stations 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 21, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 75% full in Stations 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, and 21. Observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 08/28/2024 at 10:14 AM, revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 85% full in Stations 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 21, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 75% full in Stations 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 17, and 21. During an interview on 08/28/2024 at 10:14 AM, the CM reviewed the manufacturer’s DFU and acknowledged the arterial and venous drip chamber fluid levels were not maintained according to the bloodline manufacturer’s DFU. During an interview on 08/29/2024 at 10:05 AM, the Medical Director confirmed the staff should follow the manufacturer’s DFU.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 29, 2024Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 30, 1997.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 21 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (30 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 84% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Pike County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Davita Eastern Kentucky Dialysis4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.