Hearth Record

Fmc - Lawrence County

A dialysis facility in Bedford, Indiana 47421

3253 Shawnee Dr S, Bedford, Indiana 47421. (812) 275-1084.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 10, 2024: a standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 10, 2024: standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 513 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48658 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain the physician-ordered BFR (Blood Flow Rate) for 2 of 5 in-center hemodialysis patient records reviewed (Patient #2 & #5). Findings include: 1. A policy titled “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” indicated but was not limited to: “Check prescribed blood flow is being achieved or reason is documented in the medical record if unable to meet prescribed blood flow ...” 2. The hemodialysis treatment orders for Patient #5 for 06/28/2024 through 07/06/2024 indicated a physician-ordered BFR of 400. A treatment record dated 06/27/2024 indicated a BFR of 370 30 minutes after the initiation of dialysis treatment and remained unchanged for 26 minutes; the BFR was then changed from 370 to 380 and remained unchanged for 1 hour; the BFR was then changed to the ordered rate of 400. The changes to the BFR were made without a documented reason for the change in the physician-ordered prescription. A treatment record dated 07/02/2024 indicated a BFR of 320 34 minutes after the initiation of dialysis treatment and remained unchanged for 30 minutes; the BFR was then changed from 320 to 300 and remained unchanged for the remaining duration of the treatment. 3. The hemodialysis treatment orders for Patient #2 for 06/24/2024 through 07/04/2024 indicated a Physician-ordered BFR of 400 A treatment record dated 06/24/2024 indicated a BFR change from 400 to 0, 49 minutes after the initiation of dialysis treatment. The BFR was changed from 0 to 300 after the first 1 hour and 18 minutes of initiation of dialysis treatment and remained unchanged for 56 minutes. The record failed to indicate the reason and/or intervention related to the change in the physician-ordered BFR. A treatment record dated 07/03/2024 indicated a BFR of 350 first 36 minutes after the initiation of dialysis treatment and remained unchanged for 29 minutes; the BFR was then changed from 350 to 345 and remained unchanged for 29 minutes. The record failed to indicate the reason and/or intervention related to the change in the physician-ordered BFR. 4. During an interview on 07/09/2024 at 1:25 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 indicated that if a patient is not meeting a physician-ordered BFR the Patient Care Technician (PCT) is to notify the nurse, document the reason for the change in BFR, and the physician is made aware. 5. During an interview on 07/09/2024 at 1:33 PM, PCT 2 indicated that if a BFR is changed, it should be reported to the nurse and documented in Chairside (electronic medical record system). 6. During an interview on 07/09/2024 at 10:55 AM, the Administrator indicated if a patient’s BFR is changed from the ordered rate during dialysis treatment, there should be documentation specifically about why the rate was changed, in the patient record.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 307 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48658 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow policy ensuring that the Registered Nurse (RN) assessment was completed prior to the start of dialysis treatment for 1 of 1 New Admission, in-center hemodialysis patient records reviewed (Patient #2). Findings include: 1. A policy titled, “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care” indicated but was not limited to: “Prior to Initiation of the Patients First Treatment for Patients New to Dialysis: A registered nurse must perform an assessment on patients NEW to dialysis BEFORE initiation of their first treatment to determine immediate needs”. 2. A document titled, “Patient Transfer” for Patient #2 indicated an admission date of 03/04/2024. A treatment sheet for Patient #2, dated 03/04/2024 indicated a treatment start time of 12:37 PM with an initial assessment completed by the Registered Nurse (RN) at 1:40 PM. 3. During an interview on 07/09/2024 at 12:05 PM, the Home Area Team Lead indicated that the RN assessment for a new patient starting dialysis must be completed before the patient’s first treatment. The Administrator was present during this interview. 4. During an interview on 07/09/2024 at 1:25 PM, RN 1 indicated that for a new patient admission, the RN Assessment must be completed before the patient starts treatment. 5. During an interview on 07/10/2024 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator indicated that the issue with the RN Assessment failing to record the accurate time of completion within the Electronic Medical Record had been identified and is working to remedy this concern.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 10, 2024Standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 1, 1988.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 15 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (47 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 97% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 55 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Lawrence County.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.