Hearth Record

Fmc - Bloomington Monroe

A dialysis facility in Bloomington, Indiana 47403

575 South Patterson Drive, Bloomington, Indiana 47403. (812) 333-5600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 19, 2024: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 19, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Ic - Oversight: Monitor Activities & Implement Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “IC-O-SIGHT-MONITOR ACTIVITY/IMPLEMENT P&P CFR(s): 494.30(b)(1) The facility must- (1) Monitor and implement biohazard and infection control policies and activities within the dialysis unit; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44230 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a two-step TST (tuberculin skin test) (a test used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection) was administered in 1 of 3 personnel records reviewed (Facility Administrator). Findings include: 1. A policy titled “Employee Tuberculosis Testing” indicated, but was not limited to: “TB testing using the two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) method is required upon hire...” 2. The personnel record for the Facility Administrator was reviewed on 06/19/2024. The record failed to include documentation of a two-step TST upon hire. 3. During an interview on 06/19/2024 at 10:56 AM, the Director of Operations (DOO) indicated new staff are required to have the two-step TST upon hire. He indicated the Facility Administrator only received one dose of the TST upon hire and that he had restarted the two-step TST process for the Facility Administrator at this time.”

    Rule V0142. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care

    The inspectors’ words, 256 words

    “IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44230 Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure aseptic technique was maintained when initiating a Central Venous Catheter (CVC) at the start of treatment for 1 of 2 CVC’s observed. (Patient #4) Findings Include: 1. A policy titled, “Apply mask to patient and caregiver to help prevent contamination by airborne nasal bacteria”. 2. During an observation on 06/17/2024 at 10:11 AM, RN 1 performed a dessing change for Patient #4. RN 1 failed to wear a mask when performing exit site care. 3. During an interview on 06/17/2024 at 10:32 AM, RN 1 indicated that she should have worn a mask during exit site care.”

    Rule V0147. Standard-level.

  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 584 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44230 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain the physician-ordered BFR (Blood Flow Rate) and DFR (Dialysate Flow Rate) aiding in maintaining the Kt/V (adequacy of hemodialysis) for 4 of 5 in-center hemodialysis patient record reviews (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4). Findings include: 1. A policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” indicated but was not limited to, “Check prescribed blood flow is being achieved or reason is documented in medical record if unable to meet prescribed blood flow. Check dialysate flow rate setting is correct, and the prescribed flow is being delivered. 2. The treatment record for Patient #4 indicated a Physician ordered BFR of 450 and a DFR of Auto 2x (twice the blood flow rate). A treatment record dated 06/10/2024 indicated a BFR of 350 and 700 during the entire 4 hour and 30 minute treatment without a documented reason of change in the physician ordered prescription. A treatment record dated 06/12/2024 indicated a BFR of 350 & 400 and a DFR of 700 & 800 for the entire 4 hour and 30 minute treatment without a documented reason of change in the physician ordered prescription. 3. The treatment record for Patient #3 indicated a Physician ordered BFR of 450. A treatment record dated 06/04/2024 indicated a BFR of 300 for the first 1 hour and 40 minutes of treatment and a BFR of 400 after the first 1 hour and 40 minutes of treatment, throughout the remaining treatment, without a documented reason of change in the physician ordered prescription. A treatment record dated 06/07/2024 indicated a BFR of 400 throughout the treatment, without a documented reason of change in the physician ordered prescription. A treatment record dated 06/14/2024 indicated a BFR of 400 after 1 hour and 30 minutes of treatment, without a documented reason of change in the physician ordered prescription. 4. The treatment record for Patient #2 indicated a Physician ordered BFR of 350. A treatment record dated 06/03/2024 indicated a BFR of 300 for the first 34 minutes of treatment, without a documented reason of change in the physician ordered prescription. A treatment record dated 06/05/2024 indicated a BFR of 300 for the first 47 minutes of treatment, a BFR of 250 after the first 1 hour and 17 minutes of treatment and a BFR of 200 for the last 1 hour and 17 minutes of treatment, without a documented reason of change in the physician ordered prescription. 5. The treatment record for Patient #1 indicated a Physician ordered BFR of 400. A treatment record dated 06/03/2024 indicated a BFR of 300 for the first 45 minutes of treatment, without a documented reason of change in the physician ordered prescription. 6. During an interview on 06/18/2024 at 12:30 PM, PCT (Patient Care Tech) 1 indicated if a patient’s BFR or DFR are changed to anything other than the physician’s order, it should be documented why and what interventions were put in place. 7. During an interview on 06/18/2024 at 10:20 AM, the Home Area Team Lead indicated when staff make changes to the BFR and DFR that differ from the physician’s order, it should be documented in the patient’s clinical record.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 518 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44230 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow policy ensuring expired medications and supplies were discarded and medications were properly secured for 1 of 1 ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease) facility. Findings include: 1. A policy titled “Storage of Supplies” indicated but was not limited to, “Supplies must be rotated First in-First out (FIFO) to ensure products maintain quality and do not expire. Appropriately dispose of items that have reached the expiration date”. 2. A policy titled, “Medication Preparation and Administration” indicated but was not limited to, “Expiration dates for all stored medications are to be monitored on a monthly basis. Expired medications are to be discarded via Fresenius Kidney Care off-site return program or in accordance with local and/or state law” ... “All medications will be kept in a locked cabinet except when in use. One key to the medication cabinet will be kept by the charge nurse/team leader. The Clinical Manager will retain a spare key, kept in a secure location”. 3. During an observation on 06/17/2024 at 9:36 AM, the following supplies were found to be expired: 2 bottles of Aniosgel hand sanitizer in the “dirty lab area” of the in-center treatment unit with an expiration date of 11/2023 and an additional 7 bottles of Aniosgel hand sanitizer on the supply carts on the in-center treatment unit in the patient care area with an expiration date of 11/2023. 4. During an observation on 06/17/2024 at 9:51 AM, the bottom drawer of the in-center treatment unit medication station at the front of the unit was found unlocked. Inside the drawer were the following medications: 2 boxes of Nitroglycerin (medication to treat and prevent chest pain) 0.4 mg tablets, 3 boxes of diphenhydramine hydrochloride (medication used to treat allergic reactions) 50mg/ml single-dose vials, 1 box of Solu-Medrol (medication used to treat allergic reactions) 40 mg single dose vials, and 3 boxes of Naloxone (medication used to rapidly reverse an opioid overdose) 0.4mg/ml single dose injections. 5. . During an observation on 06/17/2024 at 9:51 AM, the following expired medication was found in the in-center dialysis unit: 3 unopened bottles of Acetaminophen (medication used to treat pain and/or fever) 325 mg tablets indicated an expiration date of 04/2024. 6. During an interview on 06/17/2024 at 10:24 AM, RN 2 indicated that facility expectation is to lock any drawers used to store medications, and expired medications and supplies should be appropriately discarded. 7. During an interview on 06/17/2024 at 4:10 PM, the Director of Operations (DOO) indicated that medications are to be secured and further indicated that the medication doors are to be locked and the key with the nurse. The DOO indicated that all expired hand sanitizers found during the flash tour have been discarded and replaced.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 19, 2024Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 15, 1986.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 24 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Monroe County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Davita Hoosier Hills Dialysis3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.