Fmc - Nephrology - Elkhart
A dialysis facility in Elkhart, Indiana 46517
700 Waterbury Park Drive, Elkhart, Indiana 46517. (574) 294-4444.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 24 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Sep 9, 2025: a standard inspection.
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Sep 9, 2025: standard inspection6 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 257 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44714 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the agency failed to ensure employees followed standards of practice for hand hygiene to reduce the spread of infections for 1of 2 PCTs who worked on 09/04/2025 (PCT 1). Findings include: The agency Hand Hygiene policy, dated 11/06/2023, indicated hand hygiene with alcohol-based hand rub was required after touching a potentially soiled area in the treatment area, removal of a soiled dressing, and moving from a dirty site to a clean area. During an observation on 09/04/2025 at 11:37 AM, PCT 1 prepared to discontinue Patient #8’s dialysis. PCT 1 adjusted the dialysis machine, then used antiseptic to disinfect the CVC hubs. PCT 1 failed to complete hand hygiene after touching the dialysis machine and before completing a clean procedure. After dialysis was discontinued, PCT 1 performed care to Patient #8’s CVC (provides access to a large vein near the heart) exit site. PCT 1 failed to change gloves and complete hand hygiene after removing the soiled dressing and prior to disinfecting the CVC exit site. During an interview on 09/09/2025 beginning at 10:15 AM, PCT 1 indicated hand hygiene was required after touching the dialysis machine and after removing a soiled dressing. PCT 1 did not recall that they had not completed hand hygiene per policy.”
-
Ic - Sinks Available
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“IC-SINKS AVAILABLE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) A sufficient number of sinks with warm water and soap should be available to facilitate hand washing. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44714 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure patient restrooms contained soap for handwashing for 1 of 2 patient restrooms. Findings include: The facility “Hand Hygiene” policy, dated 11/06/2023, indicated sinks would have soap and hot and cold running water. During an observation on 09/04/2025 at 01:30 PM, one patient restroom soap dispenser failed to provide soap when a hand was under the dispenser. During an interview on 09/04/2025 at 03:14 PM, the Administrator indicated there was soap in the dispenser, but the batteries did not work so the soap was not dispensed.”
-
Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds
The inspectors’ words, 142 words
“IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44714 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the agency failed to ensure emergency medications were available for use and were not expired for 1 of 1 emergency cart. Findings include: The facility “Storage of Supplies,” dated 04/05/2021, indicated staff must dispose of expired supplies. During a treatment floor observation on 09/04/2025 at 12:04 PM, observed one bottle of Nitroglycerin tablets with an expiration date of 07/2025 in the emergency cart. During an interview on 09/04/2025 beginning at 03:30 PM, the FA indicated the CM checked the contents of the emergency cart every month and there should not be any expired medication.”
-
Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu
The inspectors’ words, 156 words
“PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44714 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency supplies were available and were not expired for 1 of 1 emergency cart. Findings include: The facility “Storage of Supplies,” dated 04/05/2021, indicated staff must dispose of expired supplies. During a treatment floor observation on 09/04/2025 at 12:04 PM, observed Yankauer suction tip (used to suction secretions in the mouth and back of throat), with an expiration date of 08/2025. Three nasal cannulas (tubing for an oxygen face mask) expired 08/15/2025. During an interview on 09/04/2025 beginning at 03:30 PM, the FA indicated there should be no expired supplies in the emergency cart.”
-
Vascular Access - Monitor/Referrals
The inspectors’ words, 211 words
“POC-VASCULAR ACCESS-MONITOR/REFERRALS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(5) The interdisciplinary team must provide vascular access monitoring and appropriate, timely referrals to achieve and sustain vascular access. The hemodialysis patient must be evaluated for the appropriate vascular access type, taking into consideration co-morbid conditions, other risk factors, and whether the patient is a potential candidate for arteriovenous fistula placement. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44714 Based on record review and interview, the IDT failed to monitor and maintain Patient #1’s blood pressure to ensure the vascular access remained intact, for 1 of 1 patient with an arteriovenous graft of the thigh. Findings include: A review of Patient #1’s treatment sheets evidenced a section titled “Special Attentions,” which stated, “Patient must maintain systolic b/p >110 while on treatment to prevent access from clotting.” Treatment sheets for 09/03/2025, 08/29/2025, and 08/22/2025, included systolic blood pressures below 110. There was no documentation the PCT notified the nurse, and no action was taken by the nurse to address the systolic blood pressure. During an interview on 09/09/2025 beginning at 12:20 PM, the CM indicated Patient #1 had limited options for another access site and it was important to maintain the current access. The CM confirmed there was no action taken when systolic blood pressure was below 110.”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 445 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44714 Based on record review and interview, the Medical Director failed to ensure direct care staff followed policy and notified the nurse when blood pressure readings were outside the parameters for 4 of 7 patient records reviewed (Patients #2, 3, 5, and 7) and failed to ensure staff monitored and maintained blood pressure to ensure the vascular access remained intact, for 1 of 1 patient with an arteriovenous graft of the thigh. (Patient #1) Findings include: 1. The facility policy “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” dated 05/01/2023, identified blood pressure parameters that require notification to the nurse. Parameters are Systolic blood pressure more than 180 or equal to or less than 100; diastolic blood pressure greater than 100. 2. Patient #2’s treatment sheets dated 08/29/2025, 08/27/2025, 08/25/2025, and 08/22/2025, identified blood pressure readings over 180 systolic and over 100 diastolic. There was no documentation the PCT notified the nurse of the out-of-range blood pressure readings. 3. Patient #3’s treatment sheets dated 05/28/2025 and 05/07/2025 identified significantly high blood pressure readings, with both systolic and diastolic out of range. 4. Patient #5’s treatment sheet dated 08/29/2025 indicated a diastolic blood pressure reading over 100. There was no documentation the PCT notified the nurse. 5. Patient #7’s treatment sheets for 09/01/2025, 08/29/2025, 08/27/2025, 08/25/2025, and 08/13/2025 identified blood pressure readings over 180 systolic and over 100 diastolic. There was no documentation the PCT notified the nurse of the out-of-range blood pressure readings. 6. During an interview on 09/09/2025 beginning at 12:35 PM, the Clinical Manager indicated they were aware PCTs did not document when they spoke to the nurse about a patient issue, and they were auditing the notes for compliance. 7. A review of Patient #1’s treatment sheets evidenced a section titled “Special Attentions,” which stated, “Patient must maintain systolic b/p >110 while on treatment to prevent access from clotting.” Treatment sheets for 09/03/2025, 08/29/2025, and 08/22/2025, included systolic blood pressures below 110. There was no documentation the PCT notified the nurse, and no action was taken by the nurse to address the systolic blood pressure. During an interview on 09/09/2025 beginning at 12:20 PM, the CM indicated Patient #1 had limited options for another access site and it was important to maintain the current access. The CM confirmed there was no action taken when systolic blood pressure was below 110.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2025 | Standard inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 9, 1994.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- 24 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Elkhart County, 4 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 3 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Fmc - Nephrology - Goshen | 3 |
| Davita Elkhart Dialysis | 3 |
| Fresenius Kidney Care North Elkhart | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.