Hearth Record

Fmc - Burbank

A dialysis facility in Burbank, Illinois 60459

4811 W 77th St, Burbank, Illinois 60459. (708) 229-0584.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 11, 2024: a standard inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 11, 2024: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 537 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48264 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 2 (Pt. #4 and Pt. #5) of 7 in-center hemodialysis patients’ records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the prescribed DFR (Dialysis Flow Rate) was followed, to ensure adequacy of patient’s dialysis treatment. Findings include: 1. On 1/10/2024, the facility’s policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” (5/2023) was reviewed and included, “...The Registered Nurse will assess/reassess any findings addressed pre (before) or during treatment ...Follow the steps below for monitoring patient and machine parameters during treatment ...Step 3 ...Check dialysate flow rate setting is correct, and the prescribed flow is being delivered ...Step 4. Document any findings and interventions in the medical record...” 2. On 1/10/2024, the clinical record of Pt. #4 was reviewed. Pt. #4 was admitted on 9/01/2013 with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). The record contained a hemodialysis treatment order dated 11/02/2023 that required: “Hemodialysis Tue (Tuesday), Thu (Thursday), Sat (Saturday) ...Tx (treatment) Time: 3 (three) hours, 15 (fifteen) minutes ... Dialysate Flow Rate (DFR): 800 mL/min (milliliters/minute)”. The clinical record lacked documentation that staff provided treatments as ordered by the physician nor physician notification that Pt. #4 was unable to tolerate ordered DFR on the following days reviewed, between 12/27/2023 and 1/08/2024: - On 12/28/2023, the treatment record indicated that the staff provided treatment with a starting DFR of 150 and then adjusted to a DFR of 500 throughout session. - On 1/04/2024, the treatment record indicated that the staff provided treatment with a starting DFR of 800 and then adjusted the DFR to 600 for remainder of session. 3. On 1/10/2024, the clinical record of Pt. #5 was reviewed. Pt. #5 was admitted on 9/01/2013 with a diagnosis of ESRD. Pt. #5’s clinical record included a hemodialysis treatment order dated 10/16/2023 that required: “Hemodialysis M (Monday), W (Wednesday), F (Friday) ...Tx Time: 3 hours, 15 minutes ...DFR: 800 mL/min”. The clinical record lacked documentation that staff provided treatments as ordered by the physician nor physician notification that Pt. #5 was unable to tolerate ordered DFR on the following days reviewed, between 12/26/2023 and 1/09/2024: - On 12/31/2023, the treatment record indicated that the staff provided treatment with a DFR of 500 throughout session. - On 1/05/2024, the treatment record indicated that the staff provided treatment with a starting DFR of 100 and then adjusted to a DFR of 500 throughout session. 4. On 1/10/2024 at approximately 1:00 PM, the findings were discussed with the Facility Administrator (E #1) and the Charge Registered Nurse (E #2). E #1 stated that staff are expected to administer hemodialysis as ordered by the physician. E #2 stated that the Registered Nurse verifies that the patient’s prescription matches what is being delivered during the dialysis treatment and that if the dialysate flow rate cannot be maintained, the physician should be notified and documented within the patient’s clinical record.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 11, 2024Standard inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 8, 2003.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 26 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (33 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 69% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 150 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Cook County, 136 have a star rating from CMS: 10 rated 5 of 5, 28 rated 4 of 5, 41 rated 3 of 5, 37 rated 2 of 5, 20 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.