Hearth Record

Fmc - Glenview Dialysis Center

A dialysis facility in Glenview, Illinois 60025

4248 Commercial Way, Glenview, Illinois 60025. (847) 824-2006.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 30, 2023: a standard inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 30, 2023: standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care

    The inspectors’ words, 402 words

    “IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27125 Based on document review, observation and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 2 technicians (E#1), the facility failed to ensure the catheter exit site was kept uncovered while drying to apply new dressing to prevent potential contamination. Findings include: 1. The Facility’s policy titled, “Changing the Catheter Dressing Procedure (5/2/2022)” was reviewed on 11/29/2023 and included, “Inspect and remove the old dressing. ... Cleaning the site: ... Remove swabstick from package by stick end without touching foam applicator. ... Using aseptic technique, apply the catheter dressing over dry exit site, being careful not to touch the patient side of the dressing.” 2. During a tour of the dialysis unit on 11/29/2023 from 9:30 AM to 11:30 AM the following was observed: - 10:00 AM, E#1 removed the old dressing from the catheter site of the patient at station #18. E#1 pulled back the patients shirt, cleaned the area around the catheter and walked away to allow to dry. The shirt went back over the open catheter site and remained there for approximately 2 minutes. The nurse (E#2) then took tape and taped the shirt away from the open catheter exit site. E#1 then placed a sterile dressing over the catheter exit site 3. During an interview on 11/29/2023 at 10:10 AM, the nurse (E#2) stated, “The shirt should not have been allowed to cover and touch the open catheter exit site after clearing. Since it did, we should have recleaned the area.” E#2 stated that patients are instructed to wear button down shirts.”

    Rule V0147. Standard-level.

  • Assess B/P & Fluid Management Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 512 words

    “PA-ASSESS B/P, FLUID MANAGEMENT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Blood pressure, and fluid management needs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27125 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 1 (Pt. #2) patients reviewed with labile (unstable) blood pressure readings, the facility failed to monitor the blood pressure when administering PRN (as needed) medications, as required. Findings include: 1. The Facility’s policy titled, “Intradialytic Hypotension (7/3/2023)” was reviewed on 11/29/2023 and included, “Ensure that blood pressure [BP] has returned to a comfortable level for the patient. Monitor and record the BP at least every 5 minutes until any symptoms related to hypotension have resolved.” 2. The Facility’s policy titled, “Medication Preparation and Administration (2/6/2023)” was reviewed on 11/29/2023 and required, “Document reason for PRN drug administration and effectiveness of medication post administration in the patient’s medical record.” 3. The clinical record of Pt. #2 was reviewed on 11/28/2023. Pt. #2 was admitted on 6/3/2019 with the diagnosis of end stage renal disease. A physician’s order, dated 9/8/2023 included, “Midodrine 5 mg [milligrams] [treat low blood pressure that causes severe dizziness and fainting] oral PRN - may repeat one time for hypotension [low blood pressure]. The following are examples of treatment sheets included in the clinical record that indicated when a PRN medication was administered and the BP was not monitored as required: - 11/24/2023 - Treatment ended at 11:23 AM with vital signs documented as 136/76 (sitting) and 125/61 (standing). Midodrine PRN, administered at 12:00 PM. The record lacked documentation of any symptoms (reason for administering) or any repeat blood pressure prior to discharge to ensure effectiveness. - 11/20/2023 - Treatment ended at 11:36 AM with vital signs documented as 142/68 (sitting) and 105/50 (standing). Midodrine PRN was administered at 12:37 PM. A nurse’s note (E#2) at 12:37 PM, “Post tx [treatment] sit to stand BP’s 50 mmHg [millimeters mercury] drop, patient dizzy standing, Midodrine PRN given.” An additional note at 1:05 PM included, “Discharged ambulatory, no complaints, vital signs stable.” The clinical record lacked documentation of any other blood pressure, before or after, administration of the medication prior to discharge to ensure effectiveness. - 11/17/2023 - Treatment ended at 11:30 AM with vital signs documented as 102/55 (sitting) and 101/55 (standing). Midodrine PRN was administered at 1:12 PM. A nurse’s note (E#2) at 1:13 PM included, “1:00 PM sit BP 102/50; patient dizzy standing up; Midodrine 5 mg [milligram] given.” A nurse’s note at 1:28 PM included, “Discharged ambulatory, no complaints, vital signs stable. The clinical record lacked documentation of blood pressure after administration of medication prior to discharge to ensure effectiveness. 4. During an interview on 11/29/2023 at approximately 1:30 PM, the registered nurse (E#2) stated that the staff know the patient very well and know when [Pt. #2] needs the medication. 5. During an interview on 11/29/2023 at 1:40 PM, the clinic manager stated, “The blood pressure should be documented when a PRN is given until the patient is stable.””

    Rule V0504. Standard-level.

  • Poc Completed/Signed By Idt & Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “POC-COMPLETED/SIGNED BY IDT & PT CFR(s): 494.90(b)(1) The patient’s plan of care must- (i) Be completed by the interdisciplinary team, including the patient if the patient desires; and (ii) Be signed by the team members, including the patient or the patient’s designee; or, if the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice must be documented on the plan of care, along with the reason the signature was not provided. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27125 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 5 (Pt. #5) patients care plan, the physician did not sign the care plan within 30 days of care plan meeting as required. Findings include: 1. The Facility’s policy titled, “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment [CIA] and Plan of Care (7/3/2023)” was reviewed on 11/29/2023 and requires, “The attending Physician reviews the CIA and indicates with his/her signature on the plan of care their oversight of the patient’s Plan of Care within 30 days.” 2. The clinical record of Pt. #5 was reviewed on 11/29/2023. Pt. #5 was admitted on 4/21/2023 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. The care plan dated 8/11/2023 was signed by the attending physician on 9/22/2023 (42 days later). 3. During an interview on 11/29/2023 at approximately 1:00 PM, the clinic manager (E#3) stated that the plan of care should be signed within 30 days.”

    Rule V0556. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 30, 2023Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Nov 28, 1990.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 20 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 150 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Cook County, 136 have a star rating from CMS: 10 rated 5 of 5, 28 rated 4 of 5, 41 rated 3 of 5, 37 rated 2 of 5, 20 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.