Magic Valley Kidney Center
A dialysis facility in Twin Falls, Idaho 83301
350 N Haven Dr Ste 100, Twin Falls, Idaho 83301. (208) 735-3914.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.
- 5of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years
- 18 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jan 26, 2024: a standard inspection.
1 deficiency cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 26, 2024: standard inspection1 deficiency
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 926 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39430 Based on record review, treatment sheet review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all policies and procedures were adhered to by facility staff. This affected 3 of 5 ICHD patients (Patient #1, #3, and #4) whose treatment records were reviewed. This resulted in patients going over 45 minutes without vital signs during ICHD, and had the potential for negative outcomes for all patients receiving ICHD. Findings include: A facility policy titled “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” effective 5/01/23 stated the following: - “Obtain blood pressure and pulse rate every 30 minutes or more as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes.” Blood pressures were not obtained per policy. Examples include but are not limited to: 1. Patient #3 was a 49 year old male who received ICHD. Patient #3’s medical record included the following treatment sheets that included blood pressure checks not being completed every 30 minutes per policy: - Patient #3’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/03/24. At 2:40 PM, Patient #3’s blood pressure was documented as 168/86 mmHg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #3 until 3:32 PM, 52 minutes later. - Patient #3’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/03/24. At 4:06 PM, Patient #3’s blood pressure was documented as 166/86 mmHg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #3 until 5:06 PM, 60 minutes later. - Patient #3’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/04/24. Patient #3 was started on treatment at 7:34 AM. There was no starting blood pressure documented and the next blood pressure was at 8:30 AM. 56 minutes after he started treatment. - Patient #3’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/04/24. At 8:30 AM, Patient #3’s blood pressure was documented as 169/96 mmHg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #3 until his treatment was discontinued at 10:31 AM, 2 hours and 1 minute later. - Patient #3’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/09/24. At 9:31 AM, Patient #3’s blood pressure was documented as 189/95 mmHg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #3 until 10:37 AM, 1 hour and 6 minutes later. The DO was interviewed on 1/26/24 beginning at 9:00 AM and Patient #3’s record was reviewed in her presence. She confirmed that greater than 45 minutes had passed between blood pressure readings for Patient #3 on the above days. She confirmed this did not follow facility policy. 2. Patient #1 was a 47 year old male who received ICHD. Patient #1’s medical record included the following treatment sheets that included blood pressure checks not being completed every 30 minutes per policy: - Patient #1’s record included a treatment sheet dated 12/20/23. At 9:07 AM, Patient #1’s blood pressure was documented as 143/78 mmHg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #1 until 10:06 AM, 59 minutes later. - Patient #1’s record included a treatment sheet dated 12/22/23. At 10:08 AM, Patient #1’s blood pressure was documented as 121/65 mmHg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #1 until 12:02 PM, 1 hour and 54 minutes later. - Patient #1’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/12/24. At 10:37 AM, Patient #1’s blood pressure was documented as 139/77 mmHg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #1 until 11:34 AM, 57 minutes later. - Patient #1’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/12/24. At 10:37 AM, Patient #1’s blood pressure was documented as 139/77 mmHg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #1 until 11:34 AM, 57 minutes later. The DO was interviewed on 1/26/24 beginning at 9:00 AM and Patient #1’s record was reviewed in her presence. She confirmed that greater than 45 minutes had passed between blood pressure readings for Patient #3 on the above days. She confirmed this did not follow facility policy. 3. Patient #4 was a 75 year old male who received ICHD. Patient #4’s medical record included the following treatment sheets that included blood pressure checks not being completed every 30 minutes per policy: - Patient #4’s record included a treatment sheet dated 12/29/23. At 10:05 AM, Patient #4’s blood pressure was documented as 99/64 mm/Hg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #4 until his treatment had ended at 11:10 AM, 1 hour and 5 minutes later. - Patient #4’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/03/24. At 9:39 AM, Patient #4’s blood pressure was documented as 117/71 mm/Hg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #4 until his treatment had ended at 10:58 AM, 1 hour and 19 minutes later. - Patient #4’s record included a treatment sheet dated 1/19/24. At 8:32 AM, Patient #4’s blood pressure was documented as 107/64 mm/Hg. There was not another blood pressure check for Patient #4 until 11:08 AM, 2 hours and 36 minutes later. The DO was interviewed on 1/26/24 beginning at 9:00 AM and Patient #4’s record was reviewed in her presence. She confirmed that greater than 45 minutes had passed between blood pressure readings for Patient #4 on the above days. She confirmed this did not follow facility policy. The facility failed to follow their policy regarding patient monitoring during dialysis treatment.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2024 | Standard inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Feb 21, 2014.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 18 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 5 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Twin Falls County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 4 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 5 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Davita Twin Falls Dialysis Center | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.