Southeastern Renal Dialysis, Lc - W Burlington
A dialysis facility in West Burlington, Iowa 52655
1213 S. Gear, West Burlington, Iowa 52655. (319) 758-0691.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 12 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Dec 3, 2025: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Dec 3, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Nurse Manager - 12 Mo Rn + 6 Mo Dialysis
The inspectors’ words, 206 words
“PQ-NURSE MANAGER-12 MO RN+6 MO DIALYSIS CFR(s): 494.140(b)(1) (1) Nurse manager. The facility must have a nurse manager responsible for nursing services in the facility who must- (i) Be a full time employee of the facility; (ii) Be a registered nurse; and (iii) Have at least 12 months of experience in clinical nursing, and an additional 6 months of experience in providing nursing care to patients on maintenance dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51639 Based on document review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nurse manager position, which oversees the nursing services of the facility, was filled by a registered nurse (RN). At the time of the survey, the facility reported a census of 59 dialysis patients. Findings include: 1) Review of the Nurse Manager’s nursing license revealed the individual was licensed as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). 2) During an interview on 12/2/25 at 2:38 PM, the Administrator confirmed the nurse manager position was filled by an LPN. The Administrator indicated the facility will need to make immediate changes to ensure compliance. 3) During an interview on 12/2/25 at 4:17 PM, the Medical Director confirmed the nurse manager position was filled by an LPN and not an RN.”
Aug 15, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds
The inspectors’ words, 291 words
“IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44475 Based on review of policy, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the facility and/or discarded to prevent future use. Failure to remove expired medications could potentially result in staff members utilizing a supply item for which the manufacturer can no longer guarantee the integrity and/or efficacy. This could potentially lead to patients being treated with a supply item that is no longer effective, leading to poor patient outcomes or illness. The facility reported a census of 49 hemodialysis patients at the time of the survey. Findings for observation of the hemodialysis area include: 1. Review of facility policy titled “Nursing Procedure-Medication Administration”, undated, included in part, “Administration: 7. Multi-dose medication vials should be labeled with date, time, and initials of individual first opening vial. Multi-dose vials should be discarded after 28 days unless otherwise indicated in manufacturers handout.” 2. Observation on 8/13/24 beginning at 8:45 AM of the med room revealed: a. 1 Vial of labetalol (medication to lower blood pressure) labeled with open date 4/6/24. b. 1 Partial vial of heparin with the septum previously punctured. In an interview with Staff A Registered Nurse (RN) acknowledged the heparin vial was a multi-dose vial and was used for multiple patients on 8/13/24. c. 1 Partial container of Vidafel Wellness Protein drink with no open date labeled on the container. 3. In an interview on 8/15/24 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator reported that medications should be discarded 30 days after the open date.”
-
Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments
The inspectors’ words, 430 words
“PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50072 Based on observations and policy review, the facility did not ensure each patient’s vascular access site and blood line connections were within view of the staff during hemodialysis treatment. Failure to ensure the patient’s vascular access and blood line connections were visible during dialysis treatment could potentially result in the staffs’ failure to identify a dislodged needle or the disconnection of a blood line which could result in significant blood loss for a patient causing adverse patient outcomes and/or death within a short amount of time. At the time of this survey, the facility reported an in-center hemodialysis patient census of 49. 1. Observations on 08/13/24 at 8:53 am showed Patient #1’s access site covered. At 8:55 am, Staff A adjusted Patient #1’s blood pressure cuff, completed computer charting and left the chairside with Patient’s #1’s access site still covered. At 8:58 am, Patient #1 independently adjusted their blanket making their access site visible. 2. Observations on 08/13/24 at 9:35 am showed Patient #3’s access site covered with a blanket. The site remained covered until 10:00 am when Patient #3 moved their blanket making the site visible. 3. Observations on 08/14/24 at 1:47 pm showed Patient #4’s access site covered by their clothing. At 2:03 pm the access site remained covered. At 2:42 pm Patient #4’s alarm was sounding. Staff D responded to the alarm and exposed the access site to perform patient care. 4. Observations on 08/14/24 at 2:04 pm showed Patient #5’s access site covered. At 2:10 pm Staff C spoke with Patient #5 chairside and the access site remained covered. At 2:15 pm Staff E spoke with Patient #5 chairside. Staff E left the chairside and the site remained covered. At 2:21 pm Staff E returned to administered medication to Patient #5. Staff E left with the access site still covered. At 2:38 pm Staff D computer charted at Patient #5’s chairside. Staff D left the chairside with the access site still covered. 5. Review of agency policy titled “Southeastern Renal Dialysis, L.C. Clinical Procedure - Patient Physical Assessment and Reassessment,” undated, reads in part, “Procedure: 1. Patient Assessment ...D. Observe lines to access every hour to verify they are well secured. Tapes and connectors may become loose during treatment. Site must be visible at all times ...” 6. On 08/15/24 at 11:00 am, Facility Administrator acknowledged the findings.”
-
Assess B/P & Fluid Management Needs
The inspectors’ words, 788 words
“PA-ASSESS B/P, FLUID MANAGEMENT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Blood pressure, and fluid management needs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44475 Based on review of policy, medical record, and staff interview, the facility failed to address the patient ’ s elevated blood pressure (BP) pre-dialysis, during the dialysis treatment, and post-dialysis to show the patient ’ s health care provider was notified and that the facility staff failed to coordinate medication delivery of an oral anti-hypertensive medication ordered to be administered during dialysis treatment with the local jail. Failure to ensure staff addressed elevated pre-dialysis BPs and/or elevated BPs during the patient ’ s dialysis treatment without notification to their provider could potentially result in an ineffective dialysis treatment, ineffective fluid removal, and/or failure to provide the necessary care, services, and dialysis treatment to meet the patient needs which could result in adverse patient outcomes and a decrease in the patient ’ s quality of life. The facility reported a census of 49 hemodialysis patients at the time of the survey. Review of 1 of 5 hemodialysis patient medical records (Patient #6) findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled “Clinical Procedure-Hypertension”, with no date, included in part, “Definition: Elevated blood pressure: Systolic above 180 - Diastolic above 90. Cause: 1. Excessive salt and water intake. 2. Renin-mediated (occurs when blood flow to the kidneys is blocked). 3. Overcompensation of the sympathetic nervous system. Symptoms/Observations: 1. High blood pressure. 2. Signs and symptoms of increased intracranial (inside the brain) pressure: Headache, lethargy, blurred vision, bradycardia (slow heart rate), vomiting. 3. Symptoms of intracranial bleeding, such as stroke-like symptoms. 4. Most commonly, patients will be asymptomatic. Nursing Intervention: 4. Notify provider if indicated. 5. Give medication to lower BP as ordered by provider. 2. Review of the facility policy titled “Incarcerated Patients”, with no date, included in part, “Purpose: To provide a guide to staff for the management of the request of current facility patients that have become incarcerated to dialyze in the facility. The facility understands the need for outpatient dialysis services in the community and will make every attempt to serve our current patients. Arrangements will be made with the law enforcement agency in custody of the individual. For the facility to allow an incarcerated person to dialyze in the dialysis unit the following items must be addressed: 5. Home medications required for the patient will be provided by the law enforcement agency. 3. Review of Patient #6 ’ s medical record included dialysis treatment flow sheets dated 7/30/24 through 8/13/24 (5 treatments). Further review showed the following: Dialysis treatment flow sheet dated 7/30/24 showed a pre-dialysis standing BP of 200/116 and a pre-dialysis sitting BP of 205/127. Post-dialysis standing BP was 199/114 and post-dialysis sitting BP was 228/125. The medical record did not contain documentation that the patient ’ s provider was notified of the high BP readings. Dialysis treatment flow sheet dated 8/3/24 showed a post-dialysis standing BP was 177/110 and post-dialysis sitting BP was 194/107. The medical record did not contain documentation that the patient ‘s provider was notified of the high BP readings. Dialysis treatment flow sheet dated 8/8/24 showed a post-dialysis standing BP was 200/112 and post-dialysis sitting BP was 194/119. The medical record did not contain documentation that the patient ‘s provider was notified of the high BP readings. Dialysis treatment flow sheet dated 8/10/24 showed the following: Post-dialysis standing BP was 172/113 and post-dialysis sitting BP was 203/118. The medical record did not contain documentation that the patient ’ s provider was notified of the high BP readings.Order for atenolol (medication to lower blood pressure) 50 milligrams (mg) PO (by mouth) every scheduled dialysis treatment. Atenolol was not administered because it was not available. The medical record did not contain documentation of provider notification or coordination with the local jail to obtain supply of the medication. Dialysis treatment flow sheet dated 8/13/24 showed the following: Post-dialysis standing BP was 164/112 and post-dialysis sitting BP was 193/120. The medical record did not contain documentation that the patient ’ s provider was notified of the high BP readings. Order for atenolol (medication to lower blood pressure) 50 mg PO every scheduled dialysis treatment. Atenolol was not administered because it was not available. The medical record did not contain documentation of provider notification or coordination with the local jail to obtain supply of the medication. 4. In an interview on 8/15/24 at 9:35 AM, the Administrator and Staff F, Facility Educator, acknowledged that atenolol was supplied by the local jail and that the jail were not aware they needed to deliver atenolol to the facility prior to 8/14/24.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Aug 15, 2024 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 30, 1997.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 12 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, worse than expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (33 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 75% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Des Moines County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.