Hearth Record

Davita Shamrock Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Dublin, Georgia 31021

1016 Claxton Dairy Road Ste 1a, Dublin, Georgia 31021. (478) 275-4200.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 9, 2025: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 9, 2025: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
  • Cfc - Responsibilities Of The Medical Director

    The inspectors’ words, 168 words

    “CFC-RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR CFR(s): 494.150 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 03383 Based on a review of facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Medical Director failed to demonstrate responsibility for the clinical operations of the facility to ensure the delivery of safe patient care. One of one Registered Nurse (RN AA) did not adhere to facility Policy and Procedures (P & P) relative to initiation of hemodialysis treatment for one of one sampled patient (P#1) who had a central venous catheter (CVC - a type of access used for hemodialysis using a soft, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein close to the heart). This failure resulted in P#1’s exsanguination (a severe and potentially fatal blood loss) during hemodialysis treatment that led to P#1’s hospitalization. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Cross Reference: V 715 - Failure of the Medical Director to ensure that RN AA adhered to facility P & P to ensure safe patient care.”

    Rule V0710. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Cfc - Governance

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “CFC-GOVERNANCE CFR(s): 494.180 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 03383 Based on a review of facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Governing Body failed to demonstrate responsibility and accountability for the operations of the facility. This failure resulted in patient’s (P#1’s) exsanguination (a severe and potentially fatal blood loss) during hemodialysis treatment. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Cross-Reference: V 715 - Failure of the Medical Director to ensure that one of one Registered Nurse (RN AA) adhered to facility policy and procedures relative to initiation of hemodialysis treatment for one of one sampled patient (P#1) who had a central venous catheter (CVC - a type of access used for hemodialysis using a soft, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein close to the heart). This failure resulted in P#1’s exsanguination (a severe and potentially fatal blood loss) during hemodialysis treatment that led to P#1’s hospitalization.”

    Rule V0750. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 03383 Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of nine patients (P#4) observed in the Patient Treatment Room at Stations (S) 11, had her vascular access site and bloodline connections uncovered/visible to the staff throughout dialysis treatment, to ensure patient safety. This deficient practice could provide an opportunity for accidental needle dislodgement or a line disconnection to go undetected and could result in exsanguination (severe loss of blood). The facility census was 62. Findings include: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 6/9/25 between 11:40 a.m. and 12: 00 p.m., the following was revealed: - P#4 had a blanket that completely covered her body from neck to toe at 11:48 a.m. The patient’s dialysis access site (right upper arm arteriovenous graft) and bloodline connections were not visible during treatment. The Facility Administrator was informed of the above findings on 6/9/25 at 1:15 p.m. and stated that they have two patients who will not leave their access uncovered and named P#4 as one of the patients. Also stated that the patient complained of “getting very cold.””

    Rule V0407. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 1,273 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 03383 Based on a review of records including facility Policy and Procedures (P & P), and patient and staff interviews, it was determined that the Medical Director failed to ensure that one of one Registered Nurse (RN AA), adhered to facility P & P relative to initiation of hemodialysis treatment for one of one sampled patient (P#1) who had a central venous catheter (CVC - a type of access used for hemodialysis using a soft, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein close to the heart). This failure resulted in P#1’s exsanguination (a severe and potentially fatal blood loss) during hemodialysis treatment that led to P#1’s hospitalization. The facility census was 62. Findings include: A review of the facility’s “Risk Event Management (REM) Log” showed the following: - On 6/4/25: P#1 experienced blood loss greater than (>) 500 cc (cubic centimeters). A review of P#1’s “Treatment Details Report” dated 6/4/25 showed the following: - At 10:21 a.m., RN AA documented “Treatment started without complications. Pt (Patient) c/o (complained of) weakness and not feeling well.” - At 10:34 a.m., RN AA documented “Pt getting settled. No complaints.” - At 10:40 a.m., RN AA documented “Pt states she does not feel well. Began checking lines and machine. Venous disconnected. Turned pt to left side and pt began foaming at the mouth. [sic] Oxygen applied and saline opened up.” - At 10:44 a.m., RN AA documented “Pt breathing but foaming at mouth. Good pulse. Oxygen still in use.” - At 10:52 a.m., RN AA documented “Squad here. Second bag of saline hung. Paramedics took over. Treatment ended earlier.” - Close Treatment Reason showed Patient Medical Emergency (paramedics called and/or patient sent to ER (Emergency Room). A review of the “Facility Incident Report Form” dated 6/6/25 showed the following: On 6/4/25 at 10:00 a.m.: Pt (P#1) placed on machine via CVC catheter by nurse. Nurse went to desk to check lobby as it was shift change. Machine started going off. Pt stated before being placed on machine she did not feel well. Went back to pt and checked machine and pt. As I was returning to check machine, pt had arm tangled in lines. I silenced machine and looked at pt. PT [sic] began losing consciousness. I then checked CVC and venous limb was disconnected. Line clamped and dialysis stopped. Unable to return blood. Pt placed on left side and fluids given. Pt received approximately 1500 cc NS (Normal Saline) EMS (Emergency Medical System) called. Upon arrival pt was breathing and continued to have a pulse throughout the event. Pt began vomiting but did not answer questions nor follow commands. Injury: Yes Blood loss and change in consciousness; Treatment Required: Yes Pt went to the ER and was dx (diagnosed) with GI bleed. [sic] A review of P#1’s “Hospitalist Discharge Summary” signed and dated 6/7/25 showed the following: Hospital course: This 59-year-old... presents to the ED (Emergency Department) on 6/4/25 due to nausea and vomiting. Patient reported her symptoms started today while she was getting dialysis. She said she had vomited some blood. The main component at bedside reported it was a fairly large amount. Patient reports that she was on anticoagulant. This is the 1st event. Also mentioned that she is feeling very weak ... Labs are remarkable for: Hemoglobin 7.6 ... Patient was admitted and the [sic] received blood transfusion, underwent upper endoscopy, which was negative for source of bleeding, EGD (Esophagogastroduodenoscopy - a procedure that uses an endoscope to examine the lining of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum [the first part of the small intestine] was normal. Free Text DxA&P (Diagnosis, Assessment and Plan): GI bleed - patient reports coffee ground emesis... - EGD - Normal upper GI (gastrointestinal) anatomy... ESRD on HD (End Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis) - patient reports bleeding from one of the ports on the Perma cath (CVC)... Anemia - bleeding from Perma cath possible cause of anemia - status post 1 unit of red blood cells transfused Plan: The patient will be transfused 1 unit of blood while on hemodialysis... During an interview with P#1 on 6/9/25 at 11:48 a.m., P#1 stated she is new to dialysis and started on 5/30/25. When asked how things are going, P#1 stated “It’s good today but it wasn’t last Wednesday (6/4/25) when it (venous bloodline) wasn’t hooked up, the nurse did not hook me up right. I passed out and was transferred to the hospital. I was in the hospital until Saturday (6/7/25) and the hospital staff told me that I lost a lot of blood. I was given blood, and I feel pretty good today.” Stated she did not want to come back for dialysis because what happened last dialysis treatment was scary. Stated this is her first treatment since she was discharged from the hospital and no one from this facility has explained to her what happened. Stated that she requested an incident report and told staff that she does not want the same nurse to care for her anymore. Stated they are honoring her wishes. During an interview with RN AA on 6/9/25 at 11:56 a.m., RN AA stated that she has worked at this facility for three years. Stated “I hooked the patient (P#1) up, walked away and the alarm went off. I didn’t connect the line tight enough.” When asked about how venous line was connected, RN AA stated “The line screws on and if not tight enough will come off. This has never happened to me before (line becoming disconnected).” When asked if she would do anything differently, RN AA stated “I would recheck the lines to make sure connections are tight enough.” RN AA stated P#1 was fiddling with blanket, and this may have caused the venous line to become disconnected. Stated she put in a REM report but has not been discussed with the Facility Administrator yet, as she has been out. During an interview on 6/9/25 at 12:06 p.m., the Facility Administrator stated that she just returned to the facility today (6/9/25), and stated she wasn’t here when the incident happened. Stated that the REM was put in wrong because the patient had less than 500 cc of blood loss. The Facility Administrator indicated she would not have reported the incident to the state if blood loss was less than 500 cc. A review of P#1’s medical records revealed that P#1 did not have an initial baseline hemoglobin drawn since admission to this facility. The Facility Administrator confirmed this finding on 6/9/25 at 12:47 p.m. - A review of facility Procedure: 1-04-02B titled, “CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER (CVC WITH CLEARGUARD HD ANTIMICROBIAL END CAPS PROCEDURE”, dated October 2024 showed the following: 21. Aseptically discard syringe containing indwelling solution from arterial limb and attach a saline filled syringe. Repeat step for venous limb. 22. Unclamp and flush each limb (catheter limb) with saline and re-clamp. 23. Attach heparin loading dose to venous limb, as applicable. Unclamp and gently flush back and forth 3-5 times into catheter. Re-clamp. 24. After a minimum of 3 - 5 minutes, remove syringe from each access port one at a time, then attach each blood line carefully, so as not to contaminate blood line tips or catheter limbs. 25. Secure connections and initiate dialysis per procedure. Secure lines to patient/patient clothing.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 9, 2025Complaint inspection4 deficiencies cited
Oct 23, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 23, 2008.
  • Run for profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 16 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, worse than expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Laurens County, 3 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.